Literature DB >> 29751955

Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus According to Insulin Treatment After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era.

Seung-Hoon Pi1, Tae-Min Rhee2, Joo Myung Lee3, Doyeon Hwang4, Jonghanne Park4, Taek Kyu Park1, Jeong Hoon Yang1, Young Bin Song1, Jin-Ho Choi5, Joo-Yong Hahn1, Byung Jin Kim6, Bum Soo Kim6, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon1, Seung-Hyuk Choi7.   

Abstract

Limited data exist regarding the clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), especially according to DM treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes among patients without DM, with non-insulin-treated DM (non-ITDM), and with ITDM after PCI using second-generation DES. We analyzed 4,812 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using second-generation DES. Primary outcomes were patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization) at 3 years. Among the total population, 3,026 patients have no DM, 1,169 have non-ITDM, and 617 have ITDM. Patients with DM, regardless of non-ITDM and ITDM, showed significantly higher risk of patient-oriented composite outcome (21.0% vs 14.5%; adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 1.66, p <0.001), mainly driven by significantly higher risk of cardiac death and any revascularization compared with non-DM. Among DM population, ITDM showed significantly higher risk of cardiac death (7.7% vs 3.7%; HRadj 1.97, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.27, p = 0.009), any revascularization (17.0% vs 11.4%; HRadj 1.40, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.93, p = 0.041), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (1.7% vs 0.7%; HRadj 2.80, 95% CI 1.04 to 7.56, p = 0.042) compared with non-ITDM. In conclusion, even in the era of second-generation DES, patients with DM are at significantly higher risk of patient-oriented adverse events. Among these, patients with ITDM showed the highest risk of adverse events, mainly driven by higher risk of mortality, any revascularization, and definite/probable stent thrombosis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29751955     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Clinical features of potential after-effects of percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of silent myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Shinichiro Doi; Makoto Suzuki; Takehiro Funamizu; Itaru Takamisawa; Tetsuya Tobaru; Hiroyuki Daida; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and implications on cardiovascular outcomes in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Benedict J Maliakkal
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-05

3.  Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Ki Hong Choi; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Christopher M Cook; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Iqbal S Malik; Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Eduardo Alegria-Barrero; Ali Alghamdi; John Altman; Sérgio B Baptista; Ravinay Bhindi; Waldemar Bojara; Salvatore Brugaletta; Pedro Canas Silva; Carlo Di Mario; Andrejs Erglis; Robert T Gerber; Olaf Going; Tobias Härle; Farrel Hellig; Ciro Indolfi; Luc Janssens; Allen Jeremias; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Ahmed Khashaba; Yuetsu Kikuta; Florian Krackhardt; Mika Laine; Sam J Lehman; Hitoshi Matsuo; Martijin Meuwissen; Giampaolo Niccoli; Jan J Piek; Flavo Ribichini; Habib Samady; James Sapontis; Arnold H Seto; Murat Sezer; Andrew S P Sharp; Jasvindar Singh; Hiroaki Takashima; Suneel Talwar; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kare Tang; Eric Van Belle; Niels van Royen; Hugo Vinhas; Christiaan J Vrints; Darren Walters; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Bruce Samuels; Chris Buller; Manesh R Patel; Patrick Serruys; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Short- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in insulin-treated versus non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wardah Hassan; Javeria Saquib; Mahima Khatri; Syeda Kanza Kazmi; Sohny Kotak; Hani Hassan; Jawad Ahmed
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2021-12-11

Review 5.  Diabetes and restenosis.

Authors:  Scott Wilson; Pasquale Mone; Urna Kansakar; Stanislovas S Jankauskas; Kwame Donkor; Ayobami Adebayo; Fahimeh Varzideh; Michael Eacobacci; Jessica Gambardella; Angela Lombardi; Gaetano Santulli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 9.951

6.  Angiographic complete revascularization versus incomplete revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Jiesuck Park; Han-Mo Yang; Seokhun Yang; Jeehoon Kang; Jung-Kyu Han; Kyung Woo Park; Hyun-Jae Kang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 8.949

7.  Clinical outcomes after permanent polymer or polymer-free stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: The ReCre8 diabetes substudy.

Authors:  Nicole D van Hemert; Rik Rozemeijer; Michiel Voskuil; Mèra Stein; Peter Frambach; Saskia Z Rittersma; Adriaan O Kraaijeveld; Geert E H Leenders; Pim van der Harst; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Pieter R Stella
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.585

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.