| Literature DB >> 29751947 |
Thomas C Tsai1, Jordan Miller2, Ciro Andolfi3, Brian Whang4, P Marco Fisichella5.
Abstract
The extent of lymphadenectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma remains controversial. Outstanding issues include the appropriate technical approach such as transthoracic versus transhiatal, or open versus minimally invasive, both of which have implications on overall lymph node harvest numbers and morbidity. Recent data on the relationship of total number of lymph nodes harvested and oncologic survival have been conflicting, due in part to a likely differential impact of lymphadenectomy on survival based on tumor stage and response to neoadjuvant therapy. While standardizing the extent of lymphadenectomy may be desirable, a more useful approach might be to tailor lymphadenectomy considering the multidimensional impact of surgical technique and multimodal treatment strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Esophagectomy; Lymphadenectomy; Personalized medicine; Staging; Surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29751947 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol ISSN: 0748-7983 Impact factor: 4.424