Literature DB >> 29751851

Reliability of the Cervical Spine Device for the Assessment of Cervical Spine Range of Motion in Asymptomatic Participants.

Massimiliano Mangone1, Andrea Bernetti1, Marco Germanotta2, Enrica Di Sipio2, Cristina Razzano1, Francesco Ioppolo1, Valter Santilli1, Teresa Venditto3, Marco Paoloni1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-assessor reliability of the cervical spine device (Formetric, DIERS International GmbH, Schlangenbad, Germany) in measuring cervical range of motion.
METHODS: The cervical spine device was used to measure the cervical range of motion of 65 asymptomatic participants. Flexion-extension, right and left rotation, and right and left lateral flexion were analyzed. Two different assessors performed the measurements on the same day to estimate inter-assessor reliability and 2 days later to examine intra-assessor reliability. Intra-assessor and inter-assessor reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable difference (SDD) were also estimated.
RESULTS: Inter-assessor reliability ICCs for flexion + extension and total lateral flexion movements were >0.90. The ICCs for rotation movements and for left lateral flexion were >0.70. The ICCs for flexion (0.64), extension (0.58), and right lateral flexion (0.56) indicated moderate correlation. Mean SEMs ranged from 2.28° (SDD = 6.31°) for left rotation to 8.08° (SDD = 22.38°) for total rotation. As for intra-assessor test-retest reliability, all ICCs were >0.70. Mean SEMs ranged from 3.14° (SDD = 8.70°) for total lateral flexion to 7.50° (SDD = 20.77°) for extension.
CONCLUSION: Both inter- and intra-observer reproducibility correlation values are moderate to high for measurements obtained using the cervical spine device.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Range of Motion; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29751851     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer.

Authors:  Andzelina Wolan-Nieroda; Agnieszka Guzik; Paulina Mocur; Mariusz Drużbicki; Andrzej Maciejczak
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The effects of spinal manipulation on performance-related outcomes in healthy asymptomatic adult population: a systematic review of best evidence.

Authors:  Melissa Corso; Silvano A Mior; Sarah Batley; Taylor Tuff; Sophia da Silva-Oolup; Scott Howitt; John Srbely
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2019-06-07

3.  A simple assessment of cervical range of motion, using indigenous technique (modified analog clinometer).

Authors:  Masoud Nashibi; Kamran Mottaghi; Zahid Hussain Khan
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.