| Literature DB >> 29751666 |
Piao Huang1,2, Liming Lv3, Wei Liao4,5, Chunhua Lu6,7, Zhongzi Xu8,9.
Abstract
Nanomaterials have been widely used in cement-based materials. Graphene has excellent properties for improving the durability of cement-based materials. Given its high production budget, it has limited its wide potential for application in the field of engineering. Hence, it is very meaningful to obtain low cost nanoplatelets from natural materials that can replace graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) The purpose of this paper is to improve the resistance to chloride ion penetration by optimizing the pore structure of cement-based materials, and another point is to reduce investment costs. The results illustrated that low cost CaCO₃ nanoplatelets (CCNPs) were successfully obtained under alkali treatment of seashell powder, and the chloride ion permeability of cement-based materials significantly decreased by 15.7% compared to that of the control samples when CCNPs were incorporated. Furthermore, the compressive strength of cement pastes at the age of 28 days increased by 37.9% than that of the plain sample. Improvement of performance of cement-based materials can be partly attributed to the refinement of the pore structure. In addition, AFM was employed to characterize the nanoplatelet thickness of CCNPs and the pore structures of the cement-based composites were analyzed by MIP, respectively. CCNPs composite cement best performance could lay the foundation for further study of the durability of cement-based materials and the application of decontaminated seashells.Entities:
Keywords: CaCO3 nanoplatelets (CCNPs); cement-based materials; chloride ion permeability; compressive strength; pore structure
Year: 2018 PMID: 29751666 PMCID: PMC5978160 DOI: 10.3390/ma11050783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Arrangement of the migration set-up.
Figure 2Particle size distribution of mussel shells powder.
Chemical composition of mussel shells powder and CEM I 42.5 Portland cement.
| Chemical Composition (%) | Cement | Mussel Shells Powder |
|---|---|---|
| CaO/CaCO3 | 54.03/96.48 | 63.82 |
| Na2O | 0.72 | 0.11 |
| SiO2 | 0.23 | 21.02 |
| SO3 | 0.13 | - |
| Al2O3 | 0.06 | 5.21 |
| MgO | 0.04 | 2.56 |
| Fe2O3 | 0.04 | 3.4 |
| P2O5 | 0.03 | - |
| K2O | 0.01 | 0.68 |
| LOI | 44.48 | 2.95 |
Figure 3X-ray diffraction patterns (1) CCNPs; (2) mussel shells powder.
Figure 4Scanning electron images. (a) mussel shells powder; (b) CCNPs-1; (c) CCNPs-2.
Figure 5High magnification AFM diagram of CCNPs. (a) Morphology; (b) height.
Figure 6Pore size Distribution of CCNPs composite cement pastes.
Porosity and pore size distribution of different mixes.
| Samples | Total Intruded Vol. (mL/g) | Total Porosity (%) | Pore Size Distribution/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <20 nm | 20–50 nm | 50–200 nm | >200 nm | |||
| 0 | 0.0804 | 15.59 | 18.54 | 37.91 | 29.76 | 13.79 |
| CCNPs-0.01 | 0.0713 | 15.42 | 22.97 | 47.52 | 17.38 | 12.13 |
| CCNPs-0.02 | 0.0767 | 15.51 | 20.57 | 44.68 | 21.92 | 12.77 |
| CCNPs-0.04 | 0.0786 | 15.58 | 17.84 | 44.29 | 23.43 | 21.82 |
Figure 7Chloride depth penetration results of cement mortar specimens with different amounts of CCNPs.
Figure 8Compressive strength diagram of cement pastes with different amounts of CCNPs.
Figure 9Compressive strength of cement mortar with different amounts of CCNPs.