Literature DB >> 29751441

Assessment of urban green space structures and their quality from a multidimensional perspective.

Benjamin Daniels1, Barbara S Zaunbrecher2, Bastian Paas3, Richard Ottermanns4, Martina Ziefle2, Martina Roß-Nickoll4.   

Abstract

Facing the growing amount of people living in cities and, at the same time, the need for a compact and sustainable urban development to mitigate urban sprawl, it becomes increasingly important that green spaces in compact cities are designed to meet the various needs within an urban environment. Urban green spaces have a multitude of functions: Maintaining ecological processes and resulting services, e.g. providing habitat for animals and plants, providing a beneficial city microclimate as well as recreational space for citizens. Regarding these requirements, currently existing assessment procedures for green spaces have some major shortcomings, which are discussed in this paper. It is argued why a more detailed spatial level as well as a distinction between natural and artificial varieties of structural elements is justified and needed and how the assessment of urban green spaces benefits from the multidimensional perspective that is applied. By analyzing a selection of structural elements from an ecological, microclimatic and social perspective, indicator values are derived and a new, holistic metrics1 is proposed. The results of the integrated analysis led to two major findings: first, that for some elements, the evaluation differs to a great extent between the different perspectives (disciplines) and second, that natural and artificial varieties are, in most cases, evaluated considerably different from each other. The differences between the perspectives call for an integrative planning policy which acknowledges the varying contribution of a structural element to different purposes (ecological, microclimatic, social) as well as a discussion about the prioritization of those purposes. The differences in the evaluation of natural vs. artificial elements verify the assumption that indicators which consider only generic elements fail to account for those refinements and are thus less suitable for planning and assessment purposes. Implications, challenges and scenarios for the application of such a metrics are finally discussed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem functions and services; Habitat structure; Multidimensional assessment; Public perception; Urban green spaces

Year:  2017        PMID: 29751441     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Natural Landscape, Infrastructure, and Health: The Physical Activity Implications of Urban Green Space Composition among the Elderly.

Authors:  Carme Miralles-Guasch; Javier Dopico; Xavier Delclòs-Alió; Pablo Knobel; Oriol Marquet; Roser Maneja-Zaragoza; Jasper Schipperijn; Guillem Vich
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The Distribution and Accessibility of Urban Parks in Beijing, China: Implications of Social Equity.

Authors:  Shu Feng; Liding Chen; Ranhao Sun; Zhiqiang Feng; Junran Li; Muhammad Sadiq Khan; Yongcai Jing
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Urban sprawl and microclimate in the Ga East municipality of Ghana.

Authors:  Kwasi Frimpong; Darko Eugene Atiemo; E J Van Etten
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-02

4.  Evaluation of urban green space per capita with new remote sensing and geographic information system techniques and the importance of urban green space during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sima Pouya; Majid Aghlmand
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.307

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.