Ultrasmall gold atom clusters (<2 nm in diameter) or gold nanoclusters exhibit emergent photonic properties (near-infrared absorption and emission) compared to larger plasmonic gold particles because of the significant quantization of their conduction band. Although single gold nanocluster properties and applications are being increasingly investigated, little is still known about their behavior and properties when assembled into suprastructures, and even fewer studies are investigating their use for biomedical applications. Here, a simple synthetic pathway combines gold nanoclusters with thermosensitive diblock copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly( N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAm) to form a new class of gold-polymer, micelle-forming, hybrid nanoparticle. The nanohybrids' design is uniquely centered on enabling the temperature-dependent self-assembly of gold nanoclusters into the hydrophobic cores of micelles. This nonbulk assembly not only preserves but also enhances the attractive near-infrared photonics of the gold nanoclusters by significantly increasing their native fluorescent signal. In parallel to the fundamental insights into gold nanocluster ordering and assembly, the gold-polymer nanohybrids also demonstrated great potential as fluorescent live-imaging probes in vitro. This innovative material design based on the temperature-dependent, self-assembly of gold nanoclusters within a polymeric micelle's core shows great promise toward bioassays, nanosensors, and nanomedicine.
Ultrasmall gold atom clusters (<2 nm in diameter) or gold nanoclusters exhibit emergent photonic properties (near-infrared absorption and emission) compared to larger plasmonic gold particles because of the significant quantization of their conduction band. Although single gold nanocluster properties and applications are being increasingly investigated, little is still known about their behavior and properties when assembled into suprastructures, and even fewer studies are investigating their use for biomedical applications. Here, a simple synthetic pathway combines gold nanoclusters with thermosensitive diblock copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly( N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAm) to form a new class of gold-polymer, micelle-forming, hybrid nanoparticle. The nanohybrids' design is uniquely centered on enabling the temperature-dependent self-assembly of gold nanoclusters into the hydrophobic cores of micelles. This nonbulk assembly not only preserves but also enhances the attractive near-infrared photonics of the gold nanoclusters by significantly increasing their native fluorescent signal. In parallel to the fundamental insights into gold nanocluster ordering and assembly, the gold-polymer nanohybrids also demonstrated great potential as fluorescent live-imaging probes in vitro. This innovative material design based on the temperature-dependent, self-assembly of gold nanoclusters within a polymeric micelle's core shows great promise toward bioassays, nanosensors, and nanomedicine.
With the emergence
of nanoscience and nanotechnology, gold is increasingly
becoming a key material for use in nanoparticle (NP) systems due to
a variety of highly attractive properties.[1−3] In particular,
light can collectively excite the free electrons of the metal to give
rise to plasmonic responses in sub-100 nm gold NPs (AuNPs). This surface
plasmon resonance (SPR) is the basis of many bioassays as its resonance
peak is highly dependent on the size, shape, and aggregation state
of the AuNPs. When reducing the size of the gold particles even further
to the atomic scale (<2 nm, ∼300 atoms), a new set of unique
molecule-like properties appears due to the significant quantization
of the conduction band.[4,5] These quantum-sized AuNPs have
discrete electronic energy levels as opposed to the continuous band
in larger plasmonic AuNPs.[6] Ultrasmall
gold atom clusters or gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) show multiple optical
absorption peaks in the optical spectrum compared to a single SPR
peak between 500 and 600 nm for larger AuNPs.[5,7] The
loss of the SPR and the appearance of fluorescent or even magnetic
properties make these quantum-sized AuNPs a new class of nanomaterial,
which explains the increasing interest toward them in recent years
from the scientific community.[8,9]This increased
interest goes hand in hand with major advances in
the synthesis and characterization of atomically precise AuNCs[7] as well as the development of theoretical models
of their emergent properties and behavior.[5] Currently, high-yield, one-pot synthesis of atomically precise AuNCs
has been achieved enabling the proliferation of studies centered on
AuNCs.[10−12] From mostly theoretical analyses, AuNCs have already
shown promise for catalysis,[13] chemical
sensing,[8] electronics,[14] and bioapplications including bioassays,[8,15] biological
labeling,[8] and nanomedicine.[4,8] In particular, AuNCs absorb light in the near-infrared (NIR) biological
window (650–900 nm)[16] and convert
it to photons and heat, making AuNCs an excellent candidate for photoinduced
cancer imaging and therapy.[4] In particular,
AuNCs stabilized in the pores of mesoporous silica shells have been
used in vivo as efficient multimodal imaging and therapy agents, demonstrating
tumor burden reduction as well as enabling three complementary imaging
modalities (fluorescent, photoacoustic, and magnetic resonance imaging).[4] Unfortunately, the clear therapeutic and imaging
potential of AuNCs in vivo has been undermined so far by their lack
of stability in biological environments.[4] Moreover, poor understanding of the aggregation behavior of AuNCs
has hindered their potential for nanotechnology-based biomedical applications.Polymeric micelles are one of the most established nanotechnology-based
systems for anticancer therapy as they often show good biocompatibility,
can be tailored through surface modifications, provide good pharmacokinetic
control, and can easily trap and deliver anticancer drugs in particular
hydrophobic drugs.[17−20] For example, micelles consisting of self-assembling diblock copolymers
composed of a hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) block and a
thermosensitive N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAm) block
provide a useful yet simple platform for drug delivery and other biological
applications.[21,22] The attractive cloud point temperature
of PNIPAm at 32 °C allows for the self-assembly of the micelles
at body temperature, and the PEG corona stabilizes and prevents the
aggregation of the micelles in biological environments.[23,24] In this paper, we present a novel nanohybrid system consisting of
AuNCs stabilized by thiol-terminated, thermosensitive diblock copolymers
of PEG-PNIPAm, which reversibly self-assemble into micelles above
their lower critical solution temperature (LCST). The resulting thermosensitive
gold-polymer micelles were used to investigate the effect of AuNCs
assembly into ordered structures or suprastructures.Although
the importance of the electronic environment around the
AuNCs has been extensively described in the literature,[5,25] most studies so far investigated the effect of ligand composition
or solvent and little is known about the effect of interparticle interactions
between AuNCs upon assembly into suprastructures. By ordering NPs
into arrays with recurring motifs (i.e., superlattices), structure-dependent
properties arise from the newly formed suprastructures.[26,27] The nonadditivity of nanoscale interparticle interactions explains
in part the large variation in NP suprastructure behavior observed
and presents an intriguing puzzle to comprehend.[28] The versatility in superlattice composition and structure
suggests that controlled NP self-assembly could turn out to be an
important means toward the design of next-generation materials.[26,27,29,30] Here, we present evidence of the importance of interactions of AuNCs
by investigating a novel, controllable, self-assembling gold-polymer
nanohybrid platform, which itself shows promise toward fluorescent
live-imaging applications.
Materials and Methods
All materials were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, The
Netherlands) and used as received unless indicated otherwise. Tetrahydrofuran
(THF), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF),
and diethyl ether were purchased from Biosolve (Valkenswaard, The
Netherlands). PBS buffer pH 7.4 (8.2 g/L NaCl, 3.1 g/L Na2HPO4·12H2O, 0.3 g/L NaH2PO4·2H2O) was purchased from B. Braun (Melsungen,
Germany). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)
and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht,
The Netherlands). Hoechst 33342 solution and phenol red free OptiMEM
medium were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bleiswijk, The
Netherlands).
Synthesis of Gold-Polymer Nanohybrids
Reversible Addition–Fragmentation
Chain Transfer (RAFT)
Polymerization of NIPAm
In a typical experiment, N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAm, 1.32 g, 11.6 mmol), poly(ethylene
glycol) methyl ether 2-(dodecylthiocarbonothioylthio)-2-methylpropionate
(PEG5000-CTA, 0.6 g, 0.12 mmol), 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile)
(AIBN, 3.94 g, 0.024 mmol) as the thermal initiator ([CTA]:[AIBN]
= 5:1), and dry dimethylformamide (DMF, 300 mg of monomer per mL)
were placed in a Schlenk flask, which was degassed by 3 freeze–pump–thaw
cycles, backfilled with N2, sealed, and heated under stirring
to 70 °C. After 16 h, the reaction was quenched by placing the
flask in an ice/water bath under air. The polymer was isolated by
a 2-fold precipitation in cold diethyl ether and dried under vacuum,
yielding a slightly yellow fine powder (yield of 61%). The conversion
was calculated by 1H NMR from the integrals of the characteristic
poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and NIPAm peaks at 3.75 and 4.0 ppm, respectively,
and was found to be 79%.
Aminolysis of the Trithiocarbonate Group
(CTA) of the PEG-PNIPAm-CTA
The polymer (∼200 mg)
was reacted with excess n-butylamine (30 equiv) in
dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, 2 mL) for 3 h.[21] The color of the solution changed from light
yellow to colorless. A few drops of n-tributylphosphine
were added to the mixture to minimize disulfide formation.[21] The polymer was subsequently isolated by 2-fold
precipitation in cold diethyl ether and obtained as a white solid
after drying.
Gold-Polymer Nanohybrid Synthesis
The gold-polymer
nanohybrids (PEG-PNIPAm-Au) were obtained by using the thiol-terminated
PEG-PNIPAm-SH polymers as stabilizing ligands. In a typical reaction,
gold(III) chloride trihydrate salt (2.4 mg) and PEG-PNIPAM-SH polymers
(500 mg) were suspended in Milli-Q water (9.8 mL) and stirred at slow
speed at room temperature for 1 h ([Au]:[SH] = 1:3). The color of
the mixture changed from yellow to colorless. After increasing the
stirring speed, sodium borohydride (0.69 mg, 0.2 mL) was added dropwise,
and the reaction mixture was left to react overnight at room temperature.
The next day, the mixture had a dark yellow/brown color. The gold-polymer
nanohybrids were dialyzed (10 kDa MWCO) against water at 4 °C
for 1 day before being freeze-dried.
Lipoic Acid-Stabilized
Gold Nanocluster Synthesis
The
control free lipoic acid-stabilized gold nanoclusters were synthesized
using a slightly modified version of the gold-polymer nanohybrids.
Instead, the thiol-terminated polymer was replaced by lipoic acid
(3.77 mg) while keeping the 1:3 gold to thiol ratio. The reaction
mixture was purified from free ligands by applying 3 cycles of centrifugation/filtration
using a membrane filtration device with a molecular weight cutoff
of 10 kDa (Millipore).
Characterization of Gold-Polymer Nanohybrids
Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy
1H NMR (400
MHz) was measured on an Agilent 400-MR NMR spectrometer
(Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). The chemical shifts were
calibrated against residual solvent peaks of CDCl3 (δ
= 7.26 ppm).
Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
GPC was performed
using a Plgel 5 μm mixed-D column (Polymer Laboratories) and
a refractive index detector (RID). The eluent was DMF containing 10
mM LiCl; the elution rate was set to 1 mL min–1,
and the temperature was set to 65 °C. The sample concentration
was 10 mg mL–1. PEGs of narrow and defined molecular
weights were used as calibration standards.
Dynamic Light Scattering
(DLS)
DLS measurements were
performed on a Malvern CGS-3 goniometer coupled to an AVL/LSE-5003
autocorrelator, a thermostated water bath, and a He–Ne laser
(25 mW, 633 nm, equipped with a model 2500 remote interface controller,
Uniphase). All measurements were carried out at 90° angle with
temperatures ranging from 10 to 55 °C. The solvent viscosity
was corrected for each temperature by the software. The z-average radius and polydispersity index were calculated by ALV and
DTS software, respectively.
Cloud Point Determination
Cloud points were determined
by measuring the onset of opalescence with light scattering. Light
scattering intensity was measured using a Jasco FP-8300 spectrophotometer
with both emission and excitation wavelength set at 550 nm with 1
nm slits and response time of 1 s. A temperature ramp of 1 °C
per min from 15 to 55 °C was applied. For the thermal stability
study, light scattering intensity at 600 nm was measured during 5
repeated temperature cycles (10 to 45 °C). Additionally, the
transition temperature was measured for PEG-PNIPAm-Au samples by photoluminescence
at 750 nm by the onset of increased intensity. The measurement setup
is described below (Steady-State Photoluminescent
Spectroscopy).
UV–Vis Spectroscopy
UV–vis
measurements
were collected using a 10 mm path-length quartz cuvette in a Shimadzu
UV 2450 spectrophotometer from 250 to 400 nm with 0.5 nm resolution.
Samples were dissolved in THF (1 mg mL–1) after
the aminolysis step of the thiol-terminated polymer.
Steady-State
Photoluminescent Spectroscopy
Steady-state
photoluminescence measurements were collected using a 10 mm path length
quartz cuvette using a Jasco FP-8300 spectrophotometer with a response
time of 1 s, 5 nm slits, and resolution of 0.5 nm. Emission spectra
were collected from 560 to 900 nm with excitation at 550 nm. Excitation
spectra were collected from 300 to 710 nm by acquiring the emission
intensity at 720 nm. Samples were dispersed in Milli-Q water, PBS,
or phenol red free OptiMEM media (1 mg mL–1), and
the samples were scanned at 10 °C unless otherwise stated. For
the determination of the temperature-dependent profile, a temperature
ramp of 1 °C per min from 10 to 60 °C was used. For the
thermal stability study, fixed-wavelength measurements were used collecting
the fluorescent emission intensity at 720 nm when excited at 550 nm
during 5 repeated temperature cycles (10 to 45 °C).
Quantum Yield
Calculation
The quantum yields (QYs)
were calculated relative to Qdot 800 ITK Carboxyl Quantum Dots (Invitrogen; QY = 0.62) in Milli-Q water. The extinction E of both the reference Qdot and samples were adjusted to be below
0.2 optical density at the excitation wavelength to minimize luminescence
quenching due to internal reabsorption. The final QYs of the samples
were calculated according towhere n is the refractive
index, I is the integrated luminescence intensity,
and ref denotes the reference sample (Qdot 800 ITK Carboxyl Quantum
Dots).[31]
Electron Microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) was used to determine the morphology of the gold-polymer nanohybrids.
Bright field TEM and high angle annular dark field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM)
images of the particles were acquired using a Tecnai20F (FEI) microscope
equipped with a Gatan CCD camera (model 694) and an energy-dispersive
X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector (Oxford Instrument) operated at
an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Samples were dissolved in Milli-Q
water (1 mg mL–1). The samples were then left at
the desired temperature (10 or 45 °C) for 30 min before being
drop-deposited on 200 mesh carbon-coated copper TEM grids (Agar Scientific)
prior to analysis.EDS analysis was used to quantify the chemical
composition of the gold-polymer nanohybrids. X-ray counts were recorded
during a 1 min period at 10 kV and analyzed using INCA Energy 3000
software (Oxford Instruments).
Cytotoxicity and Internalization
Studies
Cell Culture
The humanliver carcinomaHepG2 cells
used in this study were obtained from American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC). The cells were maintained in an incubator at a temperature
of 37 °C, regulated with 5% CO2, 95% air, and saturated
humidity. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma) was used
as the cell culture medium. The cell medium was changed every 2–4
days, and the cells were passed using trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (trypsin-EDTA) upon reaching 80% confluency.
MTS Assay
HepG2 cells were cultured in 96-well plates
(Greiner). Briefly, the cells were seeded at a density of 1 ×
104 cells cm–2 and after 16 h were cultured
with gold polymer nanohybrids or lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs at concentrations
ranging from 0.05 to 10 mg mL–1. Samples of 500
μM SDS were used as negative control. The cells were incubated
in a cell culture incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for
24 h. Afterward, the media containing the particles was removed and
replaced with 100 μL of growth medium and 20 μL of 5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4,5-dimenthylthiazoly)-3-(4-sulfophenyl)tetrazolium
salt (MTS) solution (CellTiter 96 Aqueous one Cell proliferation Assay,
Promega). After 1 h incubation time at 37 °C, the absorbance
was monitored using a microplate reader (Spectrostar) at a wavelength
of 490 nm with a reference wavelength at 650 nm. The cytotoxicity
was expressed as the percentage of cell viability compared with untreated
cell controls. The experiment was run in triplicate, and the results
are presented as percent averages ± standard deviations. The
negative control, 500 μM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), was added
to the medium on cells and left in the incubator for 24 h. The sample
is used in the same way as the particle-containing sample media.
Laser Confocal Scanning Microscopy
HepG2 cells were
cultured in 6-chamber Ibidi slides (Ibidi, Germany). Briefly, the
cells were seeded at a density of 104 cells cm–2 and cultured for 1 day with gold-polymer nanohybrids (10 mg mL–1) or lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs (0.5 mg mL–1). After the medium was removed, the cells were washed 3 times with
phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and fixed with 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde
(PFA) in PBS. Hoechst 33342 stain was used to stain the cell nuclei.
The Hoechst solution was added under dark conditions for 10 min at
37 °C. Between each step, the samples were washed twice with
PBS. The plates were visualized under a confocal microscope (Leica
TCS SP8 X MP), and the images were analyzed with LAS X (Leica Microsystems).
Results and Discussion
We synthesized gold-polymer
nanohybrids composed of gold nanoclusters
(AuNCs) stabilized with thermosensitive diblock copolymers of poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAm).
First, a thiol-terminated PEG-PNIPAm was obtained by a two-step synthesis.
Reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization
was used to add NIPAm to the commercially available PEGylated RAFT
chain transfer agent poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether 2-(dodecylthiocarbonothioylthio)-2-methylpropionate
(Scheme S1 (1)) to obtain the desired thermosensitive
diblock copolymer. RAFT polymerization was chosen as it allows the
retention of a trithiocarbonate functional group present on the chain
transfer agent (CTA) at the end of the polymerization process, which
was subsequently converted to a thiol functional group.[21,32] The successful polymerization of NIPAm to the PEG-CTA was confirmed
using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and 1H nuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The results showed that the
experimental number-average molecular weight (∼14 kDa) of the
diblock copolymer was in good agreement with the expected molecular
weight based on the feed ratio of initiator to NIPAm monomers ([initiator]:[monomer]
= 1:500) and the target conversion rate of 70–80% (Table S1). This conversion was also confirmed
by 1H NMR (Figure S1), and the
maximum conversion of 80% was chosen to avoid the loss of the end
groups due to radical side reactions at high conversion.[21] The dispersity was relatively narrow (≤1.2)
as can be expected for this type of polymerization reaction.[33]The second step consisted of converting
the trithiocarbonate group
at the ω-chain end of the PEG-PNIPAm-CTA to a thiol by aminolysis
(Scheme S1 (2)).[21] The conversion of this reaction was followed via UV–vis spectroscopy,
as the trithiocarbonate group has a characteristic absorbance at 310
nm where the thiol group does not absorb.[34] After 3 h, complete disappearance of the signal at 310 nm was observed,
reflecting the full conversion of the trithiocarbonate (Figure S2). Furthermore, no significant shift
in the molecular weight distribution was observed in the GPC chromatograms,
confirming the absence of disulfide bridge formation between two PEG-PNIPAm-SHpolymers.Finally, gold-polymer nanohybrids were prepared by
nucleating gold
in the presence of the synthesized thiol-terminated, thermosensitive
polymeric ligands. Briefly, an excess of thiolated PEG-PNIPAm-SH was
added to a gold(III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4) solution
to form gold(I)-thiol complexes before the final reduction to gold(0)
using sodium borohydride (NaBH4) (Figure ). Gold-polymer nanohybrids were formed,
resulting in particles with likely a varying number of thiolated polymeric
ligands. In parallel, control AuNCs that do not exhibit temperature-dependent
self-assembly were synthesized using a similar synthetic method but
using lipoic acid as stabilizing agent[35] rather than the thiol-terminated, thermosensitive polymers.
Figure 1
Schematic of
gold nanocluster (AuNC) synthesis using (1) lipoic
acid as stabilizing agent and (2) thiol-terminated, thermosensitive
PEG-PNIPAm-SH polymers as ligands and micelle formation upon heating
above their lower critical solution temperature (LCST). The resulting
micelles are composed of a protective PEG shell (blue) and a thermosensitive
inner core of NIPAm (red) and AuNCs (yellow).
Schematic of
gold nanocluster (AuNC) synthesis using (1) lipoic
acid as stabilizing agent and (2) thiol-terminated, thermosensitive
PEG-PNIPAm-SH polymers as ligands and micelle formation upon heating
above their lower critical solution temperature (LCST). The resulting
micelles are composed of a protective PEG shell (blue) and a thermosensitive
inner core of NIPAm (red) and AuNCs (yellow).The thermosensitive properties of the thiol-terminated PEG-PNIPAm-SH
were investigated by light scattering, and the polymer showed a cloud
point temperature of 34.8 ± 0.4 °C and micelles of 42 nm
in diameter with a narrow size distribution (PDI 0.06, dynamic light
scattering analysis) above their cloud point (Table S2). Upon conjugation of AuNCs to the polymer, the cloud
point shifted to 36.6 ± 2.5 °C, and the diameter of the
micelles decreased to 37 nm (PDI 0.10, dynamic light scattering analysis)
(Table S2). Remarkably, the transition
temperature found with photoluminescence at 750 nm showed a slightly
lower value of 30.2 ± 1.5 °C, indicating that self-assembly
occurred even before significant scattering of the samples became
visible. The slight shift in the cloud point to higher temperature
upon attachment of the AuNCs indicated that the PNIPAm block becomes
less prone to dehydration and that apparently the AuNCs contributed
to an overall increase in hydrophilicity. Adding a thermosensitive
block to the polymeric ligands not only enables an easy and reversible
formation of the AuNC-containing micelles but also enables the gold-polymer
nanohybrids to exhibit enhanced fluorescent emission at body temperature.Below their cloud point temperature, the gold-polymer nanohybrids
displayed a distinct near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent profile as expected
for the photonics properties of AuNCs in general (Figure ). However, compared to the
lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs, the gold-polymer nanohybrids displayed
a fluorescent emission mode at 720 nm compared to 703 nm for lipoic
acid-stabilized AuNCs and an increased quantum yield of 3.6% compared
to 2.7%. The gold-polymer nanohybrid quantum yield is significantly
higher than most other AuNC-based systems reported in the literature
(<1%).[7,8,36] In addition,
although the lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs exhibited a broad excitation
shoulder centered around 550 nm, the excitation profile was practically
featureless for the gold-polymer nanohybrids.
Figure 2
Gold-polymer nanohybrid
optical properties: near-infrared photoluminescence.
Photoluminescent (a) excitation (λem = 720 nm) and
(b) emission (λex = 550 nm) spectra at 10 °C
of lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs (free AuNCs, black) and gold-polymer
nanohybrids (PEG-PNIPAm-Au, red) showing emission peaks centered at
703 and 720 nm, respectively.
Gold-polymer nanohybrid
optical properties: near-infrared photoluminescence.
Photoluminescent (a) excitation (λem = 720 nm) and
(b) emission (λex = 550 nm) spectra at 10 °C
of lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs (free AuNCs, black) and gold-polymer
nanohybrids (PEG-PNIPAm-Au, red) showing emission peaks centered at
703 and 720 nm, respectively.Furthermore, the gold-polymer nanohybrids exhibited not only
fluorescent
properties in the NIR biowindow but also a nonmonotonic, temperature-dependent
fluorescent profile (Figure ). Compared to the typical decrease in fluorescence intensity
with increasing temperature observed for the lipoic acid-stabilized
AuNCs, the gold-polymer nanohybrids displayed first a decrease in
fluorescence until 29 °C before the fluorescence sharply increased
until 42 °C to finally resume into a linear decrease with increasing
temperature. When heated above their cloud point, the gold-polymer
nanohybrids formed micelles, and the AuNCs self-assemble within the
micelles’ hydrophobic cores. The morphology of lipoic acid-stabilized
AuNCs and the gold-polymer nanohybrids was investigated by transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) and showed spherical particles (∼1.5
nm) for the lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs (Figure S3) and larger spherical particles (∼50 nm) for the
gold-polymer nanohybrids at temperatures over the LCST with focal
points of higher contrast (<2 nm) observed within the core of the
nanohybrids (Figure ). High-angle annular dark field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) was used
to complement the bright field TEM study, highlighting all gold nanostructures
present in the gold-polymer nanohybrids both below and above the LCST
(Figure ). Finally,
energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (Figure S4) confirmed the presence of gold within the gold-polymer
nanohybrids.
Figure 3
Temperature-dependent photoluminescent properties. (a,
b) Temperature-dependent
3D fluorescent profile and corresponding heatmaps of (a) lipoic acid-stabilized
AuNCs (free AuNCs) and (b) gold-polymer nanohybrids (PEG-PNIPAm-Au)
showing an increase and blue-shift of the photoluminescent peak above
the lower critical temperature (LCST) of the gold-polymer nanohybrids
indicating an effect of the assembly of the AuNCs in the core of the
micelles. (c) Emission spectra under (dotted line) and over (plain
line) the LCST normalized to the maximum peak intensity under the
LCST of lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs (black) and PEG-PNIPAm-Au (red)
(λex = 550 nm).
Figure 4
Gold-polymer nanohybrid morphology. (a, b) Bright field transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images of gold-polymer nanohybrids (b) below
and (c) over the LCST. (c, d) High-angle annular dark field scanning
transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images of gold-polymer
nanohybrids highlighting the gold nanostructures within the nanohybrids
(c) below and (d) over the LCST. Scale bars: 20 nm.
Temperature-dependent photoluminescent properties. (a,
b) Temperature-dependent
3D fluorescent profile and corresponding heatmaps of (a) lipoic acid-stabilized
AuNCs (free AuNCs) and (b) gold-polymer nanohybrids (PEG-PNIPAm-Au)
showing an increase and blue-shift of the photoluminescent peak above
the lower critical temperature (LCST) of the gold-polymer nanohybrids
indicating an effect of the assembly of the AuNCs in the core of the
micelles. (c) Emission spectra under (dotted line) and over (plain
line) the LCST normalized to the maximum peak intensity under the
LCST of lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs (black) and PEG-PNIPAm-Au (red)
(λex = 550 nm).Gold-polymer nanohybrid morphology. (a, b) Bright field transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images of gold-polymer nanohybrids (b) below
and (c) over the LCST. (c, d) High-angle annular dark field scanning
transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images of gold-polymer
nanohybrids highlighting the gold nanostructures within the nanohybrids
(c) below and (d) over the LCST. Scale bars: 20 nm.Upon heating, the free lipoic acid-stabilized AuNC
control showed
a linear decrease in fluorescent intensity with a 66% maximum decrease
and a maximum red-shift of 6 nm in its fluorescent profile between
the lowest and highest temperatures investigated (Figure c, Table S2). This decrease in fluorescence intensity is expected due
to the higher amount of the incident energy being lost to nonradiative
pathways as the temperature increases. In comparison, the temperature-dependent
self assembly of the gold-polymer nanohybrids induced a maximum blue-shift
of 18 nm in the fluorescent emission peak and a 96% increase in the
fluorescent signal intensity (Figure c, Table S2). This significant
emission enhancement can be attributed to the energy transfer between
AuNCs due to the reduced intercluster distance within the polymeric
micelles’ hydrophobic cores.[37,38] Even without
an ordered assembly (i.e., constant spacing of AuNCs), the AuNCs interacted
constructively with regards to their fluorescence when their spacing
is reduced, thereby overcoming and even enhancing the natural decrease
in fluorescent intensity upon heating. The temperature driven, nonmonotonic
fluorescent emission profile of the gold-polymer nanohybrids starting
at 29 °C demonstrates that interparticle interactions between
AuNCs is a key component to achieve a comprehensive understanding
of AuNC behavior.By using thermosensitive polymers as capping
ligands for AuNCs,
the stability issue in aqueous media of the AuNCs is circumvented
while preserving and enhancing the AuNCs NIR absorption and emission.
In particular, whereas the fluorescent intensity of the lipoic acid-stabilized
AuNCs decreased with time (40% in 2 months in water at room temperature, Figure S5), indicating coalescence of the AuNCs,
the gold-polymer nanohybrids fluorescent profile remained stable during
the same period of time at room temperature demonstrating that the
polymeric ligands act as a protective, stabilizing framework that
allow the AuNCs to retain their advantageous properties in aqueous
solution. In addition, gold-polymer nanohybrids dispersed in PBS or
media did not exhibit any decrease in fluorescence, further confirming
their stability in more complex media. Repeated temperature cycles
from 10 to 45 °C (below and above the LCST, respectively) did
not affect the size, PDI, or fluorescent emission of the gold-polymer
nanohybrids demonstrating the thermal stability of the system (Figure S6). Furthermore, the high photothermal
conversion of AuNCs[4] could potentially
enable photoinduced rather than temperature-driven assembly of the
micelles.As a first step toward assessing the gold-polymer
nanohybrid potential
for bioapplications, in vitro testing demonstrated that the gold-polymer
nanohybrids did not exhibit cytotoxicity over 1 day in HepG2 cells
at 37 °C at all concentrations tested (up to 10 mg mL–1) (Figure S7). On the other hand, lipoic
acid-stabilized AuNCs significantly decreased cell viability at concentrations
as low as 0.25 mg mL–1. Furthermore, the gold-polymer
nanohybrids were internalized after 24 h in HepG2 cells at 37 °C,
whereas lipoic acid-stabilized AuNCs aggregated outside the cells
and were toxic (Figure S8). Although 37
°C is below the gold-nanohybrids’ LCST, the nanohybrids
still exhibited enhanced fluorescence at body temperature with a 61%
increased fluorescent signal intensity compared to the fluorescence
intensity at 29 °C. Importantly, the gold-polymer nanohybrid
conjugates were localized using their native fluorescence, demonstrating
their potential as fluorescent live-imaging contrast agents (Figure ). The fluorescent
images showed gold-polymer nanohybrid conjugates localized within
vesicular structures inside the cells’ cytoplasm and accumulating
in the perinuclear region (Figure ). This is compatible with endocytotic processes that
internalize particles and traffic them through the endolysosomal system
to finally accumulate in vesicles within the cells.[39]
Figure 5
Laser confocal scanning microscopy images of HepG2 cells incubated
for 24 h at 37 °C with (a) cell culture media and (b) gold-polymer
nanohybrids. Cells are stained for nucleus (Hoechst, blue). The gold-polymer
nanohybrids are localized by their native fluorescence (red) within
the cells. Scale bars: 10 μm.
Laser confocal scanning microscopy images of HepG2 cells incubated
for 24 h at 37 °C with (a) cell culture media and (b) gold-polymer
nanohybrids. Cells are stained for nucleus (Hoechst, blue). The gold-polymer
nanohybrids are localized by their native fluorescence (red) within
the cells. Scale bars: 10 μm.
Conclusions
With the use of AuNCs for biomedical applications
in its infancy,
this study points out the importance of the AuNCs direct electronic
environment. The gold-polymer nanohybrid system described here demonstrates
that the design of smart ligands that can control the immediate environment
of the AuNCs can not only help the stabilization of AuNCs in biological
environments but also give rise to new patterns in the unique properties
of the AuNCs. By using thermosensitive polymers as ligands for AuNCs,
we studied the effect of controlled, temperature-driven aggregation
of AuNCs on their native fluorescence. The results demonstrated that
the nonbulk assembly of AuNCs into the core of polymeric micelles
significantly increased their native fluorescent signal. In parallel
to the fundamental insights into AuNC ordering and assembly, the gold-polymer
nanohybrids demonstrate their great potential as fluorescent live-imaging
probes in vitro. Moreover, the gold-polymer nanohybrids have been
shown to exhibit not only properties from both the gold and polymer
components (fluorescence- and temperature-triggered self assembly,
respectively) but also properties that arise from the two components
synergistic interaction. In a broader context, the gold-polymer nanohybrids
ability to stabilize a large number of AuNCs and enhance their fluorescence
indicates their potential for applications in cancer treatment, catalysis,
nanosensing as well as label-free chemical and biochemical detection.
Authors: Albert J de Graaf; Kristel W M Boere; Johan Kemmink; Remco G Fokkink; Cornelus F van Nostrum; Dirk T S Rijkers; Jasper van der Gucht; Hans Wienk; Marc Baldus; Enrico Mastrobattista; Tina Vermonden; Wim E Hennink Journal: Langmuir Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Beatriz Pelaz; Christoph Alexiou; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Frauke Alves; Anne M Andrews; Sumaira Ashraf; Lajos P Balogh; Laura Ballerini; Alessandra Bestetti; Cornelia Brendel; Susanna Bosi; Monica Carril; Warren C W Chan; Chunying Chen; Xiaodong Chen; Xiaoyuan Chen; Zhen Cheng; Daxiang Cui; Jianzhong Du; Christian Dullin; Alberto Escudero; Neus Feliu; Mingyuan Gao; Michael George; Yury Gogotsi; Arnold Grünweller; Zhongwei Gu; Naomi J Halas; Norbert Hampp; Roland K Hartmann; Mark C Hersam; Patrick Hunziker; Ji Jian; Xingyu Jiang; Philipp Jungebluth; Pranav Kadhiresan; Kazunori Kataoka; Ali Khademhosseini; Jindřich Kopeček; Nicholas A Kotov; Harald F Krug; Dong Soo Lee; Claus-Michael Lehr; Kam W Leong; Xing-Jie Liang; Mei Ling Lim; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Xiaowei Ma; Paolo Macchiarini; Huan Meng; Helmuth Möhwald; Paul Mulvaney; Andre E Nel; Shuming Nie; Peter Nordlander; Teruo Okano; Jose Oliveira; Tai Hyun Park; Reginald M Penner; Maurizio Prato; Victor Puntes; Vincent M Rotello; Amila Samarakoon; Raymond E Schaak; Youqing Shen; Sebastian Sjöqvist; Andre G Skirtach; Mahmoud G Soliman; Molly M Stevens; Hsing-Wen Sung; Ben Zhong Tang; Rainer Tietze; Buddhisha N Udugama; J Scott VanEpps; Tanja Weil; Paul S Weiss; Itamar Willner; Yuzhou Wu; Lily Yang; Zhao Yue; Qian Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Xian-En Zhang; Yuliang Zhao; Xin Zhou; Wolfgang J Parak Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Sanne M van de Looij; Erik R Hebels; Martina Viola; Mathew Hembury; Sabrina Oliveira; Tina Vermonden Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2021-12-12 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Lies A L Fliervoet; Ekaterina S Lisitsyna; Nikita A Durandin; Ilias Kotsis; Roel F M Maas-Bakker; Marjo Yliperttula; Wim E Hennink; Elina Vuorimaa-Laukkanen; Tina Vermonden Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 6.988