Literature DB >> 29750562

A Genomic Imprinting Model of Termite Caste Determination: Not Genetic but Epigenetic Inheritance Influences Offspring Caste Fate.

Kenji Matsuura, Nobuaki Mizumoto, Kazuya Kobayashi, Tomonari Nozaki, Tadahide Fujita, Toshihisa Yashiro, Taro Fuchikawa, Yuki Mitaka, Edward L Vargo.   

Abstract

Eusocial insects exhibit the most striking example of phenotypic plasticity. There has been a long controversy over the factors determining caste development of individuals in social insects. Here we demonstrate that parental phenotypes influence the social status of offspring not through genetic inheritance but through genomic imprinting in termites. Our extensive field survey and genetic analysis of the termite Reticulitermes speratus show that its breeding system is inconsistent with a genetic caste determination model. We therefore developed a genomic imprinting model, in which queen- and king-specific epigenetic marks antagonistically influence sexual development of offspring. The model accounts for all known empirical data on caste differentiation of R. speratus and other related species. By conducting colony-founding experiments and additively incorporating relevant socio-environmental factors into our genomic imprinting model, we show the relative importance of genomic imprinting and environmental factors in caste determination. The idea of epigenetic inheritance of sexual phenotypes solves the puzzle of why parthenogenetically produced daughters carrying only maternal chromosomes exclusively develop into queens and why parental phenotypes (nymph- or worker-derived reproductives) strongly influence caste differentiation of offspring. According to our model, the worker caste is seen as a "neuter" caste whose sexual development is suppressed due to counterbalanced maternal and paternal imprinting and opens new avenues for understanding the evolution of caste systems in social insects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caste differentiation; epigenetic inheritance; genome imprinting; reproductive division of labor; social insect

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29750562     DOI: 10.1086/697238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

1.  The lose-to-win strategy of the weak: intraspecific parasitism via egg abduction in a termite.

Authors:  Chihiro Tamaki; Mamoru Takata; Kenji Matsuura
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  High expression of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 in long-lived termite kings.

Authors:  Eisuke Tasaki; Yuki Mitaka; Tomonari Nozaki; Kazuya Kobayashi; Kenji Matsuura; Yoshihito Iuchi
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Widespread occurrence of asexual reproduction in higher termites of the Termes group (Termitidae: Termitinae).

Authors:  Simon Hellemans; Klára Dolejšová; Jan Křivánek; Denis Fournier; Robert Hanus; Yves Roisin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Methylation and gene expression differences between reproductive and sterile bumblebee workers.

Authors:  Hollie Marshall; Zoë N Lonsdale; Eamonn B Mallon
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2019-08-05

5.  Evolutionary relationship of fat body endoreduplication and queen fecundity in termites.

Authors:  Tomonari Nozaki; Kenji Matsuura
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  (Epi)Genetic Mechanisms Underlying the Evolutionary Success of Eusocial Insects.

Authors:  Kayli R Sieber; Taylor Dorman; Nicholas Newell; Hua Yan
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Transcriptome changes reveal the genetic mechanisms of the reproductive plasticity of workers in lower termites.

Authors:  Chenxu Ye; Humaira Rasheed; Yuehua Ran; Xiaojuan Yang; Lianxi Xing; Xiaohong Su
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.