Literature DB >> 29750477

Apple fruit acidity is genetically diversified by natural variations in three hierarchical epistatic genes: MdSAUR37, MdPP2CH and MdALMTII.

Dongjie Jia1, Fei Shen1, Yi Wang1, Ting Wu1, Xuefeng Xu1, Xinzhong Zhang1, Zhenhai Han1.   

Abstract

Many efforts have been made to map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) to facilitate practical marker-assisted selection (MAS) in plants. In the present study, using MapQTL and BSA-seq (bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing) with two independent pedigree-based populations, we identified four major genome-wide QTLs responsible for apple fruit acidity. Candidate genes were screened in major QTL regions, and three functional gene markers, including a non-synonymous A/G single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the coding region of MdPP2CH, a 36-bp insertion in the promoter of MdSAUR37 and a previously reported SNP in MdALMTII, were validated to influence the malate content of apple fruits. In addition, MdPP2CH inactivated three vacuolar H+ -ATPases (MdVHA-A3, MdVHA-B2 and MdVHA-D2) and one aluminium-activated malate transporter (MdALMTII) via dephosphorylation and negatively influenced fruit malate accumulation. The dephosphotase activity of MdPP2CH was suppressed by MdSAUR37, which implied a higher hierarchy of genetic interaction. Therefore, the MdSAUR37/MdPP2CH/MdALMTII chain cascaded hierarchical epistatic genetic effects to precisely determine apple fruit malate content. An A/G SNP (-1010) on the MdMYB44 promoter region from a major QTL (qtl08.1) was closely associated with fruit malate content. The predicted phenotype values (PPVs) were estimated using the tentative genotype values of the gene markers, and the PPVs were significantly correlated with the observed phenotype values. Our findings provide an insight into plant genome-based selection in apples and will aid in conducting research to understand the fundamental physiological basis of quantitative genetics.
© 2018 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malus domestica Borkh; bulk segregant analysis-seq; functional gene marker; malate; quantitative trait locus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29750477     DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  20 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediated cis-engineering in horticulture: unlocking the neglected potential for crop improvement.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Manoj Sapkota; Esther van der Knaap
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 6.793

2.  Apple ALMT9 Requires a Conserved C-Terminal Domain for Malate Transport Underlying Fruit Acidity.

Authors:  Chunlong Li; Laura Dougherty; Alison E Coluccio; Dong Meng; Islam El-Sharkawy; Ewa Borejsza-Wysocka; Dong Liang; Miguel A Piñeros; Kenong Xu; Lailiang Cheng
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  MdWRKY126 modulates malate accumulation in apple fruit by regulating cytosolic malate dehydrogenase (MdMDH5).

Authors:  Lihua Zhang; Baiquan Ma; Changzhi Wang; Xingyu Chen; Yong-Ling Ruan; Yangyang Yuan; Fengwang Ma; Mingjun Li
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  A single QTL harboring multiple genetic variations leads to complicated phenotypic segregation in apple flesh firmness and crispness.

Authors:  Xianglong Yang; Bei Wu; Jing Liu; Zhongyan Zhang; Xuan Wang; Haie Zhang; Xuejun Ren; Xi Zhang; Yi Wang; Ting Wu; Xuefeng Xu; Zhenhai Han; Xinzhong Zhang
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Stable QTL for malate levels in ripe fruit and their transferability across Vitis species.

Authors:  Noam Reshef; Avinash Karn; David C Manns; Anna Katharine Mansfield; Lance Cadle-Davidson; Bruce Reisch; Gavin L Sacks
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 7.291

6.  Genetic variations of acidity in grape berries are controlled by the interplay between organic acids and potassium.

Authors:  Éric Duchêne; Vincent Dumas; Gisèle Butterlin; Nathalie Jaegli; Camille Rustenholz; Aurélie Chauveau; Aurélie Bérard; Marie Christine Le Paslier; Isabelle Gaillard; Didier Merdinoglu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Marker-trait associations and genomic predictions of interspecific pear (Pyrus) fruit characteristics.

Authors:  Satish Kumar; Chris Kirk; Cecilia Hong Deng; Angela Shirtliff; Claudia Wiedow; Mengfan Qin; Jun Wu; Lester Brewer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Apple whole genome sequences: recent advances and new prospects.

Authors:  Cameron P Peace; Luca Bianco; Michela Troggio; Eric van de Weg; Nicholas P Howard; Amandine Cornille; Charles-Eric Durel; Sean Myles; Zoë Migicovsky; Robert J Schaffer; Evelyne Costes; Gennaro Fazio; Hisayo Yamane; Steve van Nocker; Chris Gottschalk; Fabrizio Costa; David Chagné; Xinzhong Zhang; Andrea Patocchi; Susan E Gardiner; Craig Hardner; Satish Kumar; Francois Laurens; Etienne Bucher; Dorrie Main; Sook Jung; Stijn Vanderzande
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 6.793

9.  A candidate PpRPH gene of the D locus controlling fruit acidity in peach.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Xiaohan Jiang; Li Zhao; Furong Wang; Yudi Liu; Hui Zhou; Huaping He; Yuepeng Han
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 10.  Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediated cis-engineering in horticulture: unlocking the neglected potential for crop improvement.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Manoj Sapkota; Esther van der Knaap
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 6.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.