| Literature DB >> 29750298 |
Fanlan Meng1, Jun Li1, Xiao Yang2, Xiaoyong Yuan1, Xin Tang1.
Abstract
Transforming growth factor‑β (TGF‑β) is important in the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and inhibition of the TGF‑β pathway may represent a novel method of treating PCO. Drosophila protein, mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 (Smad3) is a phosphorylated receptor‑activated Smad required for the transmission of TGF‑β signals. Smad3 knockout (KO) disturbs the activation of TGF‑β signaling, thus inhibiting the onset of PCO. In the present study, lens epithelial cell (LEC) damage induced by extracapsular cataract extraction was simulated by puncture of the anterior capsule using a 26‑gauge hypodermic needle. The effect of Smad3 in the trauma‑induced epithelial‑mesenchymal transition (EMT) of the lens epithelium in Smad3‑KO and wild‑type (WT) mice was then observed. The expression levels of EMT markers and extracellular matrix components were measured in the two groups by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, western blot analysis and immunofluorescence staining. Apoptosis was also detected in the punctured anterior capsule. The Smad3‑KO mice exhibited lower expression levels of α‑smooth muscle actin, lumican, osteopontin, fibronectin and collagen, compared with the WT mice. Additionally, the Smad3‑KO mice exhibited a higher percentage of apoptotic cells than the WT mice. Smad3 signaling was associated with the induction of trauma‑induced EMT, and Smad3 KO interfered with TGF‑β signaling pathway activation, but did not completely inhibit the trauma‑induced EMT in LECs. Therefore, Smad3 may be a target in the treatment of PCO and other fibrosis‑related diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29750298 PMCID: PMC6034923 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Med ISSN: 1107-3756 Impact factor: 4.101
Primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.
| Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|
| α-SMA | 5′-TCACCATTGGAAACGAACGC-3′ | 5′-GCTGTTATAGGTGGTTTCGTGG-3′ |
| Snail1 | 5′-CACACGCTGCCTTGTGTCT-3′ | 5′-GGTCAGCAAAAGCACGGTT-3′ |
| CDH1 | 5′-CAGTTCCGAGGTCTACACCTT-3′ | 5′-TGAATCGGGAGTCTTCCGAAAA-3′ |
| Slug | 5′-CAGCGAACTGGACACACACA-3′ | 5′-ATAGGGCTGTATGCTCCCGAG-3′ |
| Twist1 | 5′-GGACAAGCTGAGCAAGATTCA-3′ | 5′-CGGAGAAGGCGTAGCTGAG-3′ |
| SIP1 | 5′-TCTGTGTAGCCCTGGCTGTC-3′ | 5′-GGTGGTCTCGCACTCCTTTA-3′ |
| HAS1 | 5′-GCGAGCACTCACGATCATCTT-3′ | 5′-GTCCATAGCGATCTGAAGCCA-3′ |
| HAS2 | 5′-GTACGGTGCCTTTTTAGCCTC-3′ | 5′-TAATCGGGGTTTCAAGGGACT-3′ |
| HAS3 | 5′-CCTGGAGCACCGTCGAATG-3′ | 5′-CCTTGAGGTTTGGAAAGGCAA-3′ |
| Lumican | 5′-TGGGACCACTGTCTTACT-3′ | 5′-CTGCTCCAGAACATACTT-3′ |
| OPN | 5′-TCCTAGACCCTAAGAGTAA-3′ | 5′-TAAGCTAAGAGCCCAAAA-3′ |
| Fibronectin | 5′-GAAGACAGATGAGCTTCCCCA-3′ | 5′-GGTTGGTGATGAAGGGGGTC-3′ |
| Collagen type I | 5′-TTCTGCAGGGTTCCAACGAT-3′ | 5′-GCAGGCGAGATGGCTTATTTG-3′ |
| GAPDH | 5′-GCAACTCCCACTCTTCCA-3′ | 5′-GTCCAGGGTTTCTTACTCC-3′ |
| hGAPDH | 5′-GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT-3′ | 5′-GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG-3′ |
| hα-SMA | 5′-GTGTTGCCCCTGAAGAGCAT-3′ | 5′-GCTGGGACATTGAAAGTCTCA-3′ |
| hSnail | 5′-TCGGAAGCCTAACTACAGCGA-3′ | 5′-AGATGAGCATTGGCAGCGAG-3′ |
| hCDH1 | 5′-CGAGAGCTACACGTTCACGG-3′ | 5′-GGGTGTCGAGGGAAAAATAGG-3′ |
| hFN1 | 5′-CGGTGGCTGTCAGTCAAAG-3′ | 5′-AAACCTCGGCTTCCTCCATAA-3′ |
| hCOL1A1 | 5′-GAGGGCCAAGACGAAGACATC-3′ | 5′-CAGATCACGTCATCGCACAAC-3′ |
α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; SIP1, SMAD-interacting protein 1; HAS, hyaluronan synthase; OPN, osteopontin; CDH1, E-cadherin; COL1A1, collagen type I α1; FN1, fibronectin 1.
Figure 1Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers at different time points following anterior capsular injury. (A) Immunohistochemical analysis of α-SMA. (B) Western blot analysis revealed that expression of α-SMA was reduced to levels that were 87.5, 92.7 and 90.6% in Smad3-KO mice of those in WT mice on days 7, 14 and 28, respectively. (C) In situ protein expression of E-cadherin in lens epithelial cells following injury. Transcription factor expression of (D) Snail, (E) Slug, (F) SIP1 and (G) Twist1 in the lens epithelium following injury. (H) Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that mRNA expression of α-SMA in Smad3-KO mice decreased to levels that were 35.5, 25.3 and 20% of those in WT mice on days 7, 14 and 28 post-injury, respectively. (I) mRNA expression level of E-cadherin at different time points following anterior capsule injury. Scale bar=50 µm. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Smad3, mothers against decapentaplegic 3; KO, knockout; WT, wild-type; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; SIP1, SMAD-interacting protein 1.
Figure 2TGF-β/Smad3 pathway involved in EMT to HLE-B3 cells challenged with TGF-β2 (10 ng/ml). (A) Gene expression of EMT biomarkers inhibited by SIS3 in HLE-B3 cells. (B) Protein expression of EMT markers in HLE-B3 cells challenged with TGF-β2 (10 ng/ml) following treatment with Smad3 inhibitor SIS3. Scale bar=100 µm. *P<0.05 TGF-β2 + SIS3 group vs. the corresponding TGF-β2 group. TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; Smad3, mothers against decapentaplegic 3; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; FN1, fibronectin 1; COL1A1, collagen type 1 α1; CDH1, E-cadherin.
Figure 3Expression levels of extracellular matrix components at different time points following anterior capsule injury. (A) mRNA expression levels of (a) lumican, (b) oesteopontin, (c) fibronectin, (d) collagen type I and (e-g) HAS in lens epithelial cells following anterior capsule injury. In situ protein expression levels were determined. (B) Western blot and (C) immunofluorescence of lumican; (D) immunofluorescence and (E) western blot of osteopontin; (F) western blot and (G) immunofluorescence of fibronectin. Immunofluorescence of (H) collagen type I and (I) HA in lens epithelial cells following injury. Scale bar=50 or 100 µm. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. KO, knockout; WT, wild-type; Smad3, mothers against decapentaplegic 3; HAS, hyaluronan synthase; HA, hyaluronan.
Figure 4TUNEL staining of apoptotic nuclei in the Smad3-KO and WT lenses. Arrows show TUNEL-positive nuclei (green) around the capsular puncture. The bar graph shows the percentage of apoptotic nuclei per 120 cells in five fields. Smad3−/− lenses had a significantly higher percentage of apoptotic nuclei (39.82±4.4%), compared with the Smad3+/+ lenses (1.1±0.44%) (P<0.05). Scale bar=50 µm. Smad3, mothers against decapentaplegic 3; KO, knockout; WT, wild-type.