| Literature DB >> 29749705 |
Giorgio Gargari1, Valentina Taverniti1, Claudio Gardana1, Cesare Cremon2, Filippo Canducci3, Isabella Pagano2, Maria Raffaella Barbaro2, Lara Bellacosa2, Anna Maria Castellazzi4, Chiara Valsecchi5, Sara Carlotta Tagliacarne4, Massimo Bellini6, Lorenzo Bertani6, Dario Gambaccini6, Santino Marchi6, Michele Cicala7, Bastianello Germanà8, Elisabetta Dal Pont8, Maurizio Vecchi9, Cristina Ogliari9, Walter Fiore10, Vincenzo Stanghellini2, Giovanni Barbara2, Simone Guglielmetti1.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a common functional gastrointestinal disorder, is classified according to bowel habits as IBS with constipation (IBS-C), with diarrhea (IBS-D), with alternating constipation and diarrhea (IBS-M), and unsubtyped (IBS-U). The mechanisms leading to the different IBS forms are mostly unknown. This study aims to evaluate whether specific fecal bacterial taxa and/or short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) can be used to distinguish IBS subtypes and are relevant for explaining the clinical differences between IBS subcategories. We characterized five fecal samples collected at 4-weeks intervals from 40 IBS patients by 16S rRNA gene profiling and SCFA quantification. Finally, we investigated the potential correlations in IBS subtypes between the fecal microbial signatures and host physiological and clinical parameters. We found significant differences in the distribution of Clostridiales OTUs among IBS subtypes and reduced levels of SCFAs in IBS-C compared to IBS-U and IBS-D patients. Correlation analyses showed that the diverse representation of Clostridiales OTUs between IBS subtypes was associated with altered levels of SCFAs; furthermore, the same OTUs and SCFAs were associated with the fecal cytokine levels and stool consistency. Our results suggest that intestinal Clostridiales and SCFAs might serve as potential mechanistic biomarkers of IBS subtypes and represent therapeutic targets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29749705 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Microbiol ISSN: 1462-2912 Impact factor: 5.491