Literature DB >> 29749086

Imposed registries within the European postmarketing surveillance system: Extended analysis and lessons learned for regulators.

Alexandra Pacurariu1,2, Kelly Plueschke1, Carla Alonso Olmo1, Xavier Kurz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Building on previous research, we examined whether delayed study start and low patient accrual rates found in 31 postauthorization registry-based studies requested by European Medicines Agency (EMA) are maintained after 2 additional years of follow-up.
METHOD: The registries identified in the previous EMA study and the same methodology were used. The follow-up was extended from June 2015 to November 2017. The information available for the following variables was updated: marketing authorization status, study and registry status, study end date, planned duration, number of patients planned to be enrolled, and actual patients enrolled. Data were collected from several nonpublic in-house sources such as the study protocols, interim and final study reports, risk management plans, and periodic safety update reports.
RESULTS: As of November 2017, 10 (32.2%) studies were finalized (vs. 9.7% as of June 2015), 14 (45.2%) were still ongoing (vs. 64.5%). Four of the ongoing studies had patients' accrual lower than 50%. Six of the finalized studies had a delayed completion, with a median delay of 3 years. As of November 2017, the median patients' accrual percentages were 24% for ongoing studies (vs. 8.5%) and 101% for finalized studies (vs. 24%).
CONCLUSION: Overall, the rate of recruitment and timely finalization were improved after 2 years of additional follow-up but show that further work is needed to facilitate use of registry data for regulatory purposes, a work that has started via the EMA registry initiative.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29749086     DOI: 10.1002/pds.4449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  7 in total

1.  Authors' Reply to Ravi Jandhyala's Comment on "Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation: Operational Proposals for Increasing the Use of Patient Registries in Regulatory Assessments".

Authors:  Patricia McGettigan; Carla Alonso Olmo; Kelly Plueschke; Mireia Castillon; Daniel Zondag; Priya Bahri; Xavier Kurz; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation : Operational proposals for increasing the use of patient registries in regulatory assessments.

Authors:  Patricia McGettigan; Carla Alonso Olmo; Kelly Plueschke; Mireia Castillon; Daniel Nogueras Zondag; Priya Bahri; Xavier Kurz; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Regulatory and health technology assessment advice on postlicensing and postlaunch evidence generation is a foundation for lifecycle data collection for medicines.

Authors:  Jane Moseley; Spiros Vamvakas; Michael Berntgen; Alison Cave; Xavier Kurz; Peter Arlett; Virginia Acha; Simon Bennett; Catherine Cohet; Solange Corriol-Rohou; Emma Du Four; Christelle Lamoril; Anja Langeneckert; Maren Koban; Muriel Pasté; Susan Sandler; Karin Van Baelen; Agnese Cangini; Sonia García; Mercè Obach; Emmanuel Gimenez Garcia; Leonor Varela Lema; Hanna-Mari Jauhonen; Piia Rannanheimo; Deborah Morrison; Marc Van De Casteele; Anna Strömgren; Anders Viberg; Amr Makady; Chantal Guilhaume
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Learning the effects of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy using real-world safety data: a paradigm shift toward modern pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Angela Lupattelli; Olav Spigset; Hedvig Nordeng
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-06-15

Review 5.  Marketing Authorization Applications Made to the European Medicines Agency in 2018-2019: What was the Contribution of Real-World Evidence?

Authors:  Robert Flynn; Kelly Plueschke; Chantal Quinten; Valerie Strassmann; Ruben G Duijnhoven; Maria Gordillo-Marañon; Marcia Rueckbeil; Catherine Cohet; Xavier Kurz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 6.903

6.  Remodeling an existing rare disease registry to be used in regulatory context: Lessons learned and recommendations.

Authors:  Marina Mordenti; Manila Boarini; Fabio D'Alessandro; Elena Pedrini; Manuela Locatelli; Luca Sangiorgi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.988

7.  Capturing Data in Rare Disease Registries to Support Regulatory Decision Making: A Survey Study Among Industry and Other Stakeholders.

Authors:  Carla J Jonker; Sieta T de Vries; H Marijke van den Berg; Patricia McGettigan; Arno W Hoes; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 5.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.