| Literature DB >> 29748822 |
Katarzyna Puczko1, Piotr Zieliński2, Szymon Jusik3, Anita Kołakowska2, Elżbieta Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk2.
Abstract
Many freshwater ecosystems face severe threats from anthropogenic disturbances. In the field, we investigated the morphology of spring niches and the species richness of vascular plants and bryophytes in 16 springs, draining the quaternary aquifers, located in two different environments-an urban area (city of Białystok) and a protected area (Knyszyn Forest Landscape Park, NE Poland). In total, 47 vascular plant and 45 bryophyte species were recorded, representing mostly crenophytes including protected species. The most important water quality parameters that can be used to evaluate variations of the spring water chemistry in NE Poland are the mineral-related parameters (electrolytic conductivity, Ca2+, SO42-, and Cl-). The organic-related parameters (DOC) and nutrients (TP, NO3--N) were negatively involved in water quality variations. Our results show that anthropogenic activity significantly affects the biodiversity of plant communities in lowland springs. The presence or absence of crenophytes and bryophytes is indicative of the ecological status of the groundwater outflow complexes.Entities:
Keywords: Crenophytes; Plant biodiversity; Plants; Springs; Water chemistry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29748822 PMCID: PMC5945798 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6703-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Fig. 1The distribution of study sites in northeastern Poland. Springs in Białystok city are indicated with B1-B5, springs in KFLP are indicated with K1-K11. Coordinates presented along the edges are in ETRS89/Poland CS92
Morphological characteristics of spring niches in the Supraśl basin (Q average [dm3 s−1]: Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk 2007, 2008, 2010)
| Geographical coordinates | Hydrological location | Type of spring | Form of the niche | Surface of the niche [m2] | Geology of the vadose zone | Land use | Anthropogenic impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 53° 05′ 49.3″ N | Biała catchment | 0.5 | Rheocrene | Round | 28 | Sand, gravel, peat | Forest | High |
| B2 | 53° 10′ 39.7″ N | Biała catchment | 0.3 | Rheocrene | Round | 500 | Sand, gravel, peat | Forest | High |
| B3 | 53° 10′ 02.8″ N | Jaroszówka catchment | 2.4 | Artificial limnocrene | Round | 450 | Sand, peat | Urban area | High |
| B4 | 53° 10′ 38.8″ N | Jaroszówka catchment | 5.2 | Rheocrene | Elongated/forked | 250 | Sand, gravel | Forest | High |
| B5 | 53° 10′ 23.9″ N | Jaroszówka catchment | 0.3 | Rheocrene | Elongated | 125 | Sand, gravel | Forest/grassland | High |
| K1 | 53° 09′ 36.8″ N | Radulinka catchment | 0.5 | Rheocrene | Round | 312 | Peat | Grassland | Low |
| K2 | 53° 14′ 39.2″ N | Sokołda catchment | n.a. | Rheocrene | Elongated | 268 | Sand, gravel, peat | Grassland/alder forest | Low |
| K3 | 53° 14′ 24.3″ N | Sokołda catchment | n.a. | Rheocrene | Elongated/forked | 160 | Sand, gravel | Grassland/alder forest | Low |
| K4 | 53° 13′ 42.3″ N | Sokołda catchment | 9.9 | Limnocrene | Round | 180 | Sand, gravel | Forest | Low |
| K5 | 53° 16′ 52.7″ N | Migówka catchment → Sokołda catchment | n.a. | Rheocrene | Round | 483 | Sand, gravel, stones | Forest/Budzisk Nature Reserve | Low |
| K6 | 53° 16′ 53.3″ N | Migówka catchment → Sokołda catchment | n.a. | Rheocrene | Round | 500 | Sand, gravel, stones | Forest/Budzisk Nature Reserve | Low |
| K7 | 53° 14′ 05.1″ N | Jałówka catchment | 2.7 | Rheocrene | Round | 368 | Sand, gravel | Forest/Jałówka Nature Reserve | Low |
| K8 | 53° 16′ 41.8″ N | Krzemianka catchment → Czarna catchment | 10.9 | Rheocrene | Round | 561 | Sand, gravel | Forest/Krzemianka Nature Reserve | Low |
| K9 | 53° 08′ 21.9″ N | stream from Sofipol catchment | 15.2 | Rheocrene | Round | 310 | Sand, gravel | Grassland/alder forest | Low |
| K10 | 53° 05′ 39.0″ N | Świniobródka catchment → Płoska catchment | 4.5 | Rheocrene | Round | 405 | Sand, gravel | Forest | Low |
| K11 | 53° 11′ 13.3″ N | Pilnica catchment | 4.9 | Rheocrene | Elongated | 171 | Sand, gravel | Forest/Krasne Nature Reserve | Low |
Summary statistics for spring water chemistry (significant differences calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05)
| Stands | Springs B1-B5 | Springs K1-K11 | Statistical difference ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Unit | Average | Median | Min | Max | Average | Median | Min | Max | |
| pH | 8.2 | 7.9 | 7.6 | 9.0 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 8.6 |
| |
| EC | μS cm−1 | 589 | 580 | 364 | 897 | 394 | 395 | 149 | 588 |
|
| Ca2+ | mg dm−3 | 101.3 | 103.2 | 73.3 | 139.4 | 73.6 | 72.9 | 25.5 | 98.8 |
|
| Cl− | mg dm−3 | 18.3 | 20.1 | 7.7 | 29.9 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 3.6 | 41.5 | 0.396 |
| SO42− | mg dm−3 | 85.0 | 88.6 | 39.3 | 117.9 | 53.0 | 49.2 | 14.1 | 87.0 | 0.062 |
| Total Fe | mg dm−3 | 1.54 | 1.25 | 0.57 | 3.55 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.13 | 4.00 |
|
| DOC | mg dm−3 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 9.5 | 5.6 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 22.1 |
|
| NO3−-N | μg dm−3 | 310 | 120 | 25 | 1334 | 617 | 203 | 66 | 4576 |
|
| NH4+-N | μg dm−3 | 129 | 129 | 63 | 233 | 167 | 174 | 32 | 345 |
|
| Total P | μg dm−3 | 73 | 60 | 37 | 164 | 83 | 68 | 28 | 167 | 0.234 |
Values in italic are significant at 0.05 level
Correlation matrix (Pearson (n)) of the chemical parameters of spring water
| Variables | pH | EC | Ca2+ | Cl− | SO42− | Total Fe | DOC | NO3−-N | NH4+-N | Total P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | 0.457 | − 0.441 | 0.853 | 0.827 | 0.809 | − 0.029 | − 0.485 | − 0.369 | 0.061 |
| EC | 0.457 | 1 | − 0.249 | 0.428 | 0.568 | 0.418 | 0.010 | − 0.495 | − 0.043 | − 0.344 |
| Ca2+ | − 0.441 | − 0.249 | 1 | − 0.345 | − 0.167 | − 0.318 | 0.242 | 0.000 | − 0.181 | − 0.041 |
| Cl− | 0.853 | 0.428 | − 0.345 | 1 | 0.750 | 0.773 | 0.309 | − 0.480 | − 0.532 | 0.096 |
| SO42− | 0.827 | 0.568 | − 0.167 | 0.750 | 1 | 0.615 | 0.118 | − 0.603 | − 0.503 | − 0.191 |
| Total Fe | 0.809 | 0.418 | − 0.318 | 0.773 | 0.615 | 1 | 0.014 | − 0.377 | − 0.302 | 0.049 |
| DOC | − 0.029 | 0.010 | 0.242 | 0.309 | 0.118 | 0.014 | 1 | 0.110 | − 0.544 | − 0.055 |
| NO3−-N | − 0.485 | − 0.495 | 0.000 | − 0.480 | − 0.603 | − 0.377 | 0.110 | 1 | 0.108 | − 0.091 |
| NH4+-N | − 0.369 | − 0.043 | − 0.181 | − 0.532 | − 0.503 | − 0.302 | − 0.544 | 0.108 | 1 | 0.032 |
| Total P | 0.061 | − 0.344 | − 0.041 | 0.096 | − 0.191 | 0.049 | − 0.055 | − 0.091 | 0.032 | 1 |
Squared cosines of the chemical parameters of spring water
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH |
| 0.022 | 0.031 | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| EC |
| 0.059 | 0.302 | 0.001 | 0.130 |
| Ca2+ | 0.121 | 0.342 | 0.050 |
| 0.041 |
| Cl− |
| 0.020 | 0.045 | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| SO42− |
| 0.006 | 0.035 | 0.011 | 0.026 |
| Total Fe |
| 0.012 | 0.035 | 0.011 | 0.024 |
| DOC | 0.022 |
| 0.000 | 0.041 | 0.201 |
| NO3−-N | 0.386 | 0.032 | 0.015 |
| 0.024 |
| NH4+-N | 0.240 |
| 0.008 | 0.004 | 0.051 |
| Total P | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| 0.121 | 0.055 |
For each variable, values in italics correspond to the factor for which the squared cosine is the largest
Fig. 2Adjusted biplot scores of chemical variables with sampling sites indicating the measure of fit with the significance level (p < 0.05)
Species of vascular plants found in spring niches with relative abundance and sociability (abund., soc.)
| Vascular plant species | Spring niches | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | K1 | K2 | K3 | K4 | K5 | K6 | K7 | K8 | K9 | K10 | K11 | |
|
| + 0.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | + 0.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||
|
| 1.1 | + 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | |||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | |||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.2 | |||||||
|
| 1.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 2.2 | ||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | ||||||||||
|
| 3.2 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 2.2 | 2.2 | + 0.1 | 2.3 | 2.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |||||||
|
| + 0.1 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | ||||||||||
|
| 3.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||
|
| 2.3 | 1.1 | 2.2 | |||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | + 0.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
| 3.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.2 | ||||||
|
| 1.3 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 2.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 2.3 | ||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | + 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||
|
| 2.3 | + 0.1 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 4.3 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | |||||||
|
| + 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||
|
| 4.5 | 5.5 | ||||||||||||||
|
| 2.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | |||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | 1.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | ||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
| 1.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | + 0.1 | + 0.1 | |||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||
|
| + 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 2.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||
|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 2.2 | ||||||
*Protected species
Bryophyte species found in spring niches and their protection status
| Bryophytes species | Spring niches | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | K1 | K2 | K3 | K4 | K5 | K6 | K7 | K8 | K9 | K10 | K11 | |
| Liverworts | ||||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||
| | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||
| Mosses | ||||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
| | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | |||||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
| | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
*Protected species
Fig. 3The values of the biodiversity metrics in two locations (mean ± standard error ± 0.95 confidence interval) and results of Welch’s test
Biodiversity indices of vascular plants and bryophytes for each spring niches (statistical significance calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05)
| Spring niches | Statistical difference ( | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | K1 | K2 | K3 | K4 | K5 | K6 | K7 | K8 | K9 | K10 | K11 | ||
| Vascular plants | |||||||||||||||||
| Species richness | 5 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 4 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 11 | 16 | 14 | 9 | 16 | 15 |
|
| Species diversity (H′) | 1.21 | 2.28 | 1.05 | 2.28 | 1.00 | 1.59 | 1.60 | 2.16 | 1.97 | 2.27 | 1.82 | 2.07 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 2.26 | 1.91 | 0.533 |
| IFO | 19.0 | 28.2 | 41.8 | 21.3 | 20.1 | 42.0 | 20.4 | 18.6 | 15.1 | 22.1 | 16.3 | 20.1 | 32.4 | 30.7 | 28.4 | 25.9 | 0.910 |
| Bryophytes | |||||||||||||||||
| Species richness | 8 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
|
| IFO | 15.7 | 18.7 | 37.5 | 49. | 28.7 | 22.8 | 40.6 | 42.9 | 21.4 | 36.2 | 40.9 | 32.2 | 45.1 | 28.0 | 24.3 | 17.4 | 0.692 |
Values in italic are significant at 0.05 level
Fig. 4CCA ordination diagram of vascular plants and environmental variables based on 16 sampling sites
Fig. 5CCA ordination diagram of bryophytes and environmental variables based on 16 sampling sites