Aparna Govil Bhasker1, John B Dixon2, Muffazal Lakdawala3,4. 1. Global Hospital, 35, Dr. E Borges Road, Opposite Shirodkar High school, Hospital Avenue, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India. draparnagovil@gmail.com. 2. Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Primary Care Research Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India. 4. Minimal Access Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prospective data was evaluated to see whether bariatric procedure type made any difference to diabetes remission. METHODS:One hundred eighty-six consecutive patients of Indian ethnicity (M:F 89:97) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and HbA1c > 6.5 were assessed before and at 1 year following surgery. Age, BMI, C-peptide and duration of diabetes (ABCD - described by WJ Lee), insulin use, baseline HbA1c, and % weight loss were tested as modifiers. We present remission rates (HbA1c ≤ 6.0%) and between group remission odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR after controlling for key modifiers. RESULTS:Patients selecting RYGB (n = 113) vs SG (n = 73) were older (50.7 vs 44.2 years), had a lower BMI (44.1 vs 46.7), lower C-peptide (3.5 vs 4.7 ng/ml), greater duration of diabetes (8 vs 3 years), and higher HbA1c (8.90 and 7.9%) respectively p < 0.05 for all (combined R2 = 0.38). Weight loss at 1 year was 27 and 30% for RYGB and SG respectively (p = 0.01). Remission at 1 year was achieved by 37% of patient selecting RYGB and 74% for the SG (OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.41, p < 0.001). After adjusting for ABCD, the adjusted OR (AOR) still favored the SG (AOR = 0.32, 0.14-0.74, p = 0.01), and adjustment for HbA1c and weight loss (AOR 0.4, 0.17-0.95, p = 0.038) attenuated the effect. CONCLUSION: The analysis suggests SG may be superior to RYGB in this Indian population. Ethnicity may play a role in predicting the response to bariatric surgery and hence the choice of procedure. A randomized controlled trial is needed to clarify the relative benefit.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Prospective data was evaluated to see whether bariatric procedure type made any difference to diabetes remission. METHODS: One hundred eighty-six consecutive patients of Indian ethnicity (M:F 89:97) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and HbA1c > 6.5 were assessed before and at 1 year following surgery. Age, BMI, C-peptide and duration of diabetes (ABCD - described by WJ Lee), insulin use, baseline HbA1c, and % weight loss were tested as modifiers. We present remission rates (HbA1c ≤ 6.0%) and between group remission odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR after controlling for key modifiers. RESULTS:Patients selecting RYGB (n = 113) vs SG (n = 73) were older (50.7 vs 44.2 years), had a lower BMI (44.1 vs 46.7), lower C-peptide (3.5 vs 4.7 ng/ml), greater duration of diabetes (8 vs 3 years), and higher HbA1c (8.90 and 7.9%) respectively p < 0.05 for all (combined R2 = 0.38). Weight loss at 1 year was 27 and 30% for RYGB and SG respectively (p = 0.01). Remission at 1 year was achieved by 37% of patient selecting RYGB and 74% for the SG (OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.41, p < 0.001). After adjusting for ABCD, the adjusted OR (AOR) still favored the SG (AOR = 0.32, 0.14-0.74, p = 0.01), and adjustment for HbA1c and weight loss (AOR 0.4, 0.17-0.95, p = 0.038) attenuated the effect. CONCLUSION: The analysis suggests SG may be superior to RYGB in this Indian population. Ethnicity may play a role in predicting the response to bariatric surgery and hence the choice of procedure. A randomized controlled trial is needed to clarify the relative benefit.
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adam P Chambers; Henriette Kirchner; Hilary E Wilson-Perez; Jill A Willency; John E Hale; Bruce D Gaylinn; Michael O Thorner; Paul T Pfluger; Jesus A Gutierrez; Matthias H Tschöp; Darleen A Sandoval; Randy J Seeley Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Francesco Rubino; David M Nathan; Robert H Eckel; Philip R Schauer; K George M M Alberti; Paul Z Zimmet; Stefano Del Prato; Linong Ji; Shaukat M Sadikot; William H Herman; Stephanie A Amiel; Lee M Kaplan; Gaspar Taroncher-Oldenburg; David E Cummings Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mario Masrur; Roberto Bustos; Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen; Luis Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; Alberto Mangano; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Ronak Patel; Kirstie K Danielson; Antonio Gangemi; Enrique Fernando Elli Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 4.129