Phillip N Williams1, Michelle H McGarry2, Hansel Ihn2, Brian M Schulz3, Orr Limpisvasti3, Neal S ElAttrache3, Thay Q Lee2. 1. Department of Orthopedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: Phillip.n.williams@uth.tmc.edu. 2. Orthopedics Biomechanics Laboratory, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA. 3. Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The original 2-strand docking technique for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction has recently been modified to use a 3-strand graft. To date, no biomechanical study has compared the 2 techniques. We hypothesized that the 3-strand docking technique would restore valgus laxity to its native state, with comparable load-to-failure characteristics to the 2-strand docking technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen fresh cadaveric elbows were matched to the corresponding contralateral side from the same individual to create 8 matched pairs and were then randomized to undergo ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using either the 2- or 3-strand technique. Valgus laxity and rotation measurements were quantified using a MicroScribe 3DLX digitizer at various flexion angles for the native state, transected state, and 1 of the 2 tested reconstructed ligaments. Each reconstruction was then tested to failure. RESULTS: Valgus laxity for the intact state at elbow flexion angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° was 7° ± 2°, 7° ± 2°, 6° ± 1°, and 5° ± 2°, respectively. These values were similar to those of both reconstruction techniques. On load-to-failure testing, there was no significant difference in any parameter recorded. Yield torques for the 3- and 2-strand reconstructions were 13.4 ± 4.80 N/m and 11.8 ± 4.76 N/m, respectively (P = .486). The ultimate torques were 15.7 ± 6.10 N/m and 14.4 ± 5.58 N/m for the 3- and 2-strand techniques, respectively (P = .582). CONCLUSION: The 3-strand docking technique was able to restore valgus laxity to the native state, with similar load-to-failure characteristics to the 2-strand docking technique.
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The original 2-strand docking technique for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction has recently been modified to use a 3-strand graft. To date, no biomechanical study has compared the 2 techniques. We hypothesized that the 3-strand docking technique would restore valgus laxity to its native state, with comparable load-to-failure characteristics to the 2-strand docking technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen fresh cadaveric elbows were matched to the corresponding contralateral side from the same individual to create 8 matched pairs and were then randomized to undergo ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using either the 2- or 3-strand technique. Valgus laxity and rotation measurements were quantified using a MicroScribe 3DLX digitizer at various flexion angles for the native state, transected state, and 1 of the 2 tested reconstructed ligaments. Each reconstruction was then tested to failure. RESULTS: Valgus laxity for the intact state at elbow flexion angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° was 7° ± 2°, 7° ± 2°, 6° ± 1°, and 5° ± 2°, respectively. These values were similar to those of both reconstruction techniques. On load-to-failure testing, there was no significant difference in any parameter recorded. Yield torques for the 3- and 2-strand reconstructions were 13.4 ± 4.80 N/m and 11.8 ± 4.76 N/m, respectively (P = .486). The ultimate torques were 15.7 ± 6.10 N/m and 14.4 ± 5.58 N/m for the 3- and 2-strand techniques, respectively (P = .582). CONCLUSION: The 3-strand docking technique was able to restore valgus laxity to the native state, with similar load-to-failure characteristics to the 2-strand docking technique.