| Literature DB >> 29747652 |
Sara Jalali-Farahani1, Parisa Amiri2, Mehrdad Karimi1,3, Golnaz Vahedi-Notash1, Golshan Amirshekari4, Fereidoun Azizi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated the positive association between perceived social support and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in certain groups; however, few studies have assessed this relationship in general population and between genders. This study aimed to investigate associations between socio-demographic factors, perceived social support and HRQoL among an urban Iranian population.Entities:
Keywords: Adults; Health-related quality of life; Iran; Social support; Socio-demographic factors
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29747652 PMCID: PMC5946411 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-0914-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Fig. 1Conceptual model for the association between socio-demographic factors, social support health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
Descriptive statistics of study participants
| Male ( | Female ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 50.3 ± 16.3 | 49.6 ± 14.0 | 0.52 |
| Marital status n(%) | |||
| -Single | 83 (19.6) | 139 (22.7) | 0.257 |
| -Married | 341 (80.4) | 473 (77.3) | |
| Level of education n(%) | |||
| -Primary | 109 (25.7) | 208 (34.0) | 0.016 |
| -Secondary | 171 (40.3) | 226 (36.9) | |
| -Higher | 144 (34.0) | 178 (29.1) | |
| Employment status n(%) | |||
| - Unemployed/student/housewife | 32 (7.5) | 434 (70.9) | < 0.001 |
| - Unemployed, but had other sources of income | 111 (26.2) | 71 (11.6) | |
| - Employed | 281 (66.3) | 107 (17.5) | |
| Chronic diseases | |||
| -No | 244 (57.5) | 302 (49.3) | 0.011 |
| -Yes | 180 (42.5) | 310 (50.7) | |
| Social support scores | 65.8 ± 12.2 | 64.6 ± 12.6 | 0.15 |
| - Family | 24.0 ± 4.3 | 23.2 ± 4.8 | 0.003 |
| - Friend | 19.1 ± 6.0 | 19.2 ± 6.2 | 0.88 |
| -Significant other | 22.6 ± 5.3 | 22.3 ± 5.7 | 0.32 |
| SF-12 scores | |||
| -Physical Function | 87.2 ± 22.9 | 80.6 ± 25.2 | < 0.001 |
| -Role Physical | 84.6 ± 20.5 | 73.3 ± 24.1 | < 0.001 |
| -Bodily pain | 85.1 ± 21.0 | 75.4 ± 24.7 | < 0.001 |
| -General Health | 49.9 ± 22.2 | 45.2 ± 22.5 | < 0.001 |
| PCS | 49.6 ± 7.3 | 47.2 ± 8.5 | < 0.001 |
| -Vitality | 69.2 ± 24.4 | 60.5 ± 25.9 | < 0.001 |
| -Social Function | 84.3 ± 24.9 | 77.5 ± 27.1 | < 0.001 |
| -Role Emotional | 80.3 ± 22.2 | 71.0 ± 24.2 | < 0.001 |
| -Mental Health | 74.8 ± 20.3 | 65.7 ± 22.1 | < 0.001 |
| MCS | 50.6 ± 9.6 | 46.5 ± 11.1 | < 0.001 |
Continuous variables are represented as mean ± SD and the categorical ones are presented as frequency (percentage)
PCS Physical component summary, MCS Mental component summary
Model comparison, fit indices and results of chi-square test for comparisons between the two models
| Model | DF | χ2/DF | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | GFI | NFI | IFI | AIC | Model comparisons(χ2,DF) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unconstraineda | 158 | 3.82 | 0.052 | 0.079 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 831.5 | Assuming to be correct |
| Measurement weightsb | 166 | 3.71 | 0.051 | 0.080 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 828.5 | 12.96, DF = 8 |
| Structural weightsc | 183 | 3.53 | 0.050 | 0.083 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 823.5 | 41.94*, DF = 25 |
| Structural covarianced | 196 | 5.30 | 0.064 | 0.096 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 1190.5 | 434.9**, DF = 38 |
| Structural residualse | 200 | 5.28 | 0.064 | 0.098 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 1200.2 | 452.7**, DF = 42 |
| Measurement residualsf | 215 | 5.10 | 0.063 | 0.098 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 1209.9 | 492.5**, DF = 57 |
Unconstrained model assuming to be correct, other proposed models b-f were compared to unconstrained model using chi-square difference test
DF degree of freedom, RMSEA root of mean square error approximation, SRMR standardized root mean square residual, CFI comparative fit index, GFI goodness of fit index, NFI normed fit index, IFI incremental fit index, AIC Akaike information criterion
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001. aAll of the parameters were considered different in men and women, bEqual factor loadings for measurement model of social support and quality of life constructs in men and women, Equal factor loadings and regression weights between latent variables in men and women, dEqual covariance for latent constructs in men and women, eEqual residual variances for latent constructs in men and women fAll parameters were considered equal in men and women
Fig. 2Final structural models after testing the association between socio-demographic factors, social support and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (a Men and b Women)
Results of the structural equation modeling analysis: gender-specific relationships between socio-demographic factors, social support and HRQoL
| Male | Female | Difference CR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient β | CR | Coefficient β | CR | |||
| Age | Social support | −0.191 | −2.28* | −0.041 | −0.65 | 1.32 |
| Marital statusa | 0.326 | 4.13** | 0.164 | 3.37** | −1.84 | |
| Educationb | −0.006 | −0.10 | 0.066 | 1.16 | 0.87 | |
| Employment statusc | − 0.070 | −1.19 | − 0.017 | − 0.33 | 0.80 | |
| Chronic diseasesd | 0.041 | 0.64 | 0.079 | 1.44 | 0.43 | |
| Age | PCS | − 0.034 | −0.44 | − 0.216 | −3.70** | − 2.16* |
| Marital status | − 0.179 | − 2.43* | −0.164 | −3.75** | 0.15 | |
| Education | 0.081 | 1.48 | 0.077 | 1.47 | −0.02 | |
| Employment status | 0.063 | 1.17 | −0.019 | −0.41 | − 1.19 | |
| Chronic diseases | −0.088 | −1.49 | − 0.122 | − 2.43* | − 0.46 | |
| Social support | 0.193 | 3.15** | 0.201 | 4.54** | 0.26 | |
| Age | MCS | 0.245 | 2.82** | 0.185 | 2.95** | 0.53 |
| Marital status | −0.067 | −0.87 | − 0.096 | − 2.06* | − 0.71 | |
| Education | −0.050 | −0.86 | 0.083 | 1.47 | 1.70 | |
| Employment status | 0.027 | 0.47 | −0.026 | − 0.52 | −0.70 | |
| Chronic diseases | −0.004 | −0.06 | − 0.144 | − 2.64** | − 2.04* | |
| Social support | 0.397 | 4.90** | 0.422 | 7.54** | 2.09* | |
| PCSe | 0.744 | 6.05** | 0.634 | 8.26** | 1.18 | |
PCS Physical component summary, MCS Mental component summary
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, aSingle group was considered as reference group, bHigher education was considered as reference group, cUnemployed group was considered as reference group, dNot having chronic diseases was considered as reference group, ecorrelation coefficient