Literature DB >> 29747563

Psychological distress in remote mining and construction workers in Australia.

Jennifer Bowers1, Johnny Lo2, Peta Miller3, Daveena Mawren3, Brooklyn Jones3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and correlates of psychological distress in a sample of remote mining and construction workers in Australia. Design, setting: A cross-sectional, anonymous Wellbeing and Lifestyle Survey at ten mining sites in South Australia and Western Australia, administered at meetings held during 2013-2015. PARTICIPANTS: 1124 employees at remote construction, and open cut and underground mining sites completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: General psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K10) and self-reported overall mental health status; work, lifestyle and family factors correlated with level of psychological distress.
RESULTS: The final sample comprised 1124 workers; 93.5% were men, 63% were aged 25-44 years. 311 respondents (28%) had K10 scores indicating high/very high psychological distress, compared with 10.8% for Australia overall. The most frequently reported stressors were missing special events (86%), relationship problems with partners (68%), financial stress (62%), shift rosters (62%), and social isolation (60%). High psychological distress was significantly more likely in workers aged 25-34 years (v ≥ 55 years: odds ratio [OR], 3.2; P = 0.001) and workers on a 2 weeks on/1 week off roster (v 4 weeks on/1 week off: OR, 2.4; P < 0.001). Workers who were very or extremely stressed by their assigned tasks or job (OR, 6.2; P = 0.004), their current relationship (OR, 8.2; P < 0.001), or their financial situation (OR, 6.0; P < 0.001) were significantly more likely to have high/very high K10 scores than those not stressed by these factors. Workers who reported stress related to stigmatisation of mental health problems were at the greatest risk of high/very high psychological distress (v not stressed: OR, 23.5; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress is significantly more prevalent in the remote mining and construction workforce than in the overall Australian population. The factors that contribute to mental ill health in these workers need to be addressed, and the stigma associated with mental health problems reduced.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education, public health; Health promotion; Mental health policy; Mental health services; Prevention and control; Psychology; Rural health services

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29747563     DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  9 in total

Review 1.  Occupational Factors Affecting Women Workers' Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes in Oil, Gas, and Mining Industry: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Rina Hariniaina Razafimahefa; Jerico Franciscus Pardosi; Adem Sav
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Prevalent Health Problems among Nepalese Underground Construction Workers.

Authors:  Rajan Ghimire; Ganesh Prasad Neupane
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  Exploring the Relationships between Safety Compliance, Safety Participation and Safety Outcomes: Considering the Moderating Role of Job Burnout.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Yang; Boling Zhang; Lulu Wang; Lanxin Cao; Ruipeng Tong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Mental Well-Being during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study of Fly-In Fly-Out Workers in the Mining Industry in Australia.

Authors:  Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare; Elizabeth Thomas; Jacquita S Affandi; Myles Schammer; Paul Brown; Matthew Pilbeam; Chris Harris; Chris Ellison; Dominika Kwasnicka; Daniel Powell; Christopher M Reid; Suzanne Robinson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Health and related behaviours of fly-in fly-out workers in the mining industry in Australia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare; Suzanne Robinson; Daniel Powell; Dominika Kwasnicka
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.851

6.  The Overall Health of Men Who Do Fly-in Fly-Out Work in the Mining Sector.

Authors:  Oscar Labra; Christelle Brouillette; Gabriel Gingras-Lacroix; Tommy Cousineau; Jennifer Quirion
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct

7.  Employee Stress, Reduced Productivity, and Interest in a Workplace Health Program: A Case Study from the Australian Mining Industry.

Authors:  Tamara D Street; Sarah J Lacey; Klaire Somoray
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Bullying in Fly-In-Fly-Out employees in the Australian resources sector: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Peta Miller; Libby Brook; Norman Stomski; Graeme Ditchburn; Paul Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Job Stress and Working Capacity among Fly-In-Fly-Out Workers in the Oil and Gas Extraction Industries in the Arctic.

Authors:  Yana Korneeva; Natalia Simonova
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.