BACKGROUND: The Zimmer iASSIST system is an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that does not require the use of a large console for alignment feedback as required in computer-assisted surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the accelerometer-based system in component positioning and overall mechanical alignment. METHODS: Two groups of 30 patients each with primary osteoarthritis underwent TKA using either conventional method or Zimmer iASSIST navigation in 2013 was retrospectively studied. Patients were matched according to body mass index (BMI), gender and age. A senior arthroplasty surgeon performed all the operation using the same surgical approach. Perioperative and post-operative regimens were the same. All patients had standardized radiographs performed post-operatively to determine the lower limb mechanical alignment and component placement. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups for age, BMI, gender, side of operated knee and preoperative mechanical axis ( p > 0.05). There was no difference in the proportion of outliers for mechanical axis ( p = 0.38), coronal femoral angle ( p = 0.50), coronal tibia angle ( p = 0.11), sagittal femoral angle ( p = 0.28) and sagittal tibia angle ( p = 0.33). The duration of surgery, post-operative drop in haemoglobin level and transfusion incidence did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our article showed that iASSIST was safe and remains a useful tool to restore mechanical axis. However, our data demonstrated no difference in lower limb alignment and component placement between the TKA that used accelerometer-based system and those that underwent conventional method.
BACKGROUND: The Zimmer iASSIST system is an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that does not require the use of a large console for alignment feedback as required in computer-assisted surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the accelerometer-based system in component positioning and overall mechanical alignment. METHODS: Two groups of 30 patients each with primary osteoarthritis underwent TKA using either conventional method or Zimmer iASSIST navigation in 2013 was retrospectively studied. Patients were matched according to body mass index (BMI), gender and age. A senior arthroplasty surgeon performed all the operation using the same surgical approach. Perioperative and post-operative regimens were the same. All patients had standardized radiographs performed post-operatively to determine the lower limb mechanical alignment and component placement. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups for age, BMI, gender, side of operated knee and preoperative mechanical axis ( p > 0.05). There was no difference in the proportion of outliers for mechanical axis ( p = 0.38), coronal femoral angle ( p = 0.50), coronal tibia angle ( p = 0.11), sagittal femoral angle ( p = 0.28) and sagittal tibia angle ( p = 0.33). The duration of surgery, post-operative drop in haemoglobin level and transfusion incidence did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our article showed that iASSIST was safe and remains a useful tool to restore mechanical axis. However, our data demonstrated no difference in lower limb alignment and component placement between the TKA that used accelerometer-based system and those that underwent conventional method.