| Literature DB >> 29747160 |
Srinivas Pittala1, Yakov Krelin1, Varda Shoshan-Barmatz2.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most lethal cancer worldwide. Despite progress in identifying risk factors, the incidence of HCC is increasing. Moreover, therapeutic options are limited and survival is poor. Therefore, alternative and innovative therapeutic strategies are urgently required. R-Tf-D-LP4, a cell-penetrating peptide derived from the mitochondrial multifunctional protein the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC1), is identified here as a highly effective liver cancer treatment. Recently, we demonstrated that R-Tf-D-LP4 induced apoptosis and inhibited tumor growth in mouse models. We now demonstrate that R-Tf-D-LP4 induced apoptosis in cancer liver-derived cell lines and inhibited tumor growth in three different liver cancer mouse models. These included diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced HCC, metabolically high-fat diet-induced HCC, and using a subcutaneous HepG2 cell xenograft model. Intravenous injection of the peptide into tumor-carrying DEN-treated mice resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of tumor growth up to complete tumor elimination. TUNEL staining of liver sections demonstrated peptide-induced apoptosis. Hematoxylin/eosin and Sirius red staining of liver sections showed decreased fibrotic formation. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated reduced numbers of α-SMA-expressing cells in R-Tf-D-LP4-treated mouse livers. Additionally, macrophage presence in liver tissue was reduced in R-Tf-D-LP4-treated mice. Liver sections from DEN-treated mice showed steatohepatic pathology, reflected as fatty liver, inflammation, ballooning degeneration, and fibrosis; all were eliminated upon peptide treatment. Peptide treatment also inhibited tumor development in a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-hepatocellular carcinoma mouse model induced by HFD. In HepG2 subcutaneous tumor xenografts, R-Tf-D-LP4 inhibited tumor growth.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29747160 PMCID: PMC5994780 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.02.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neoplasia ISSN: 1476-5586 Impact factor: 5.715
Antibodies used in this study.
| Antibody | Source and Catalog No. | Dilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IHC | WB | IF | ||
| Mouse monoclonal anti-actin | Millipore, Billerica, MA, MAB1501 | - | 1:40000 | - |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-AIF | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab32516 | 1:200 | 1:1000 | - |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-alpha smooth muscle actin antibody | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab5694 | 1:200 | - | - |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-ATP5a | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab14748 | 1:300 | - | - |
| Rat monoclonal anti-CD45R (B220) | Ebioscience, CA, USA, 11-0452-82 | - | - | 1:300 |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-Bcl-xL | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab32516 | - | 1:2000 | - |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-caspase 3 | Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, 9662 | - | 1:2000 | - |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-caspase 8 | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab108333 | - | 1:1000 | - |
| Armenian hamster monoclonal-CD3e (145-2C11), FITC | Ebioscience, CA, USA, 36-0031-85 | - | - | 1:300 |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-CD4 | Abnova, Taiwan, PAB19557 | - | - | 1:300 |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-CD8 | Biolegend, San Diego, CA, 100702 | - | - | 1:300 |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-citrate synthase | Abcam, Cambridge, UK ab96600 | 1:200 | - | - |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-cytochrome | BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, 556432 | 1:300 | 1:2000 | - |
| Rat monoclonal anti-F4/80 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Dallas, TX, sc52664 | 1:150 | - | - |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-FOXP3 | Biolegend, San Diego, CA, 126402 | - | - | 1:300 |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab9484 | 1: 200 | - | - |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Glut1 | Abcam, Cambridge, UK ab40084 | 1: 200 | - | |
| Mouse monoclonal anti-HK-I | Abcam, Cambridge, UK ab105213 | - | 1:2000 | - |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-HK II | Abcam, Cambridge, UK ab3279 | 1:400 | 1:2000 | - |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67 | Thermo Scientific, NY RM-9106-s1 | 1:200 | - | - |
| Goat polyclonal anti-LDH-A | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Dallas, TX,sc-27230 | 1:200 | - | - |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-TfR | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab84036 | - | 1:2000 | - |
| Rabbit monoclonal anti-VDAC1 | Abcam, Cambridge, UK,ab15895 | 1:500 | 1:5000 | - |
| Donkey anti-Goat-HRP | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab97120 | 1:500 | - | - |
| Goat anti-Mouse-HRP | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab97040 | 1:250 | 1:10,000 | |
| Donkey anti-Mouse (Alexa Fluor 488) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab150109 | - | - | 1:1000 |
| Goat anti-Rabbit-HRP | KPL, Gaithersburg, USA, 474-1506 | 1:500 | 1:15,000 | - |
| Goat anti-Rabbit (FITC) | Ebioscience, CA, USA, 65-6111 | - | - | 1:500 |
| Goat anti-Rat-HRP | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Dallas, TX, sc-2006 | 1:500 | - | - |
Antibodies against the indicated protein, their catalogue number, source and the dilutions used in IHC and immunoblot experiments were presented.
Figure 1VDAC1 is overexpressed in liver tumor and cancer cell lines, and cell death is inducted by the VDAC1-based peptide R-Tf-D-LP4.
(A) Tissue array (US Biomax) comprising human normal liver (n = 5) and liver cancer (n = 19) sections stained with anti-VDAC1 antibodies. Percentages of sections stained at the intensity indicated are shown. Immunoblot analysis of HK-II, VDAC1, and Bcl-xL (B) expression in noncancerous and liver cancer-derived cells. (C). The levels of HK-II (black bars), VDAC1 (light grey bars), and Bcl-xL (dark bars) in the indicated cell line are presented relative to their expression levels in the T-REx-293 cell line. (D) Immunoblot analysis of HK-II, VDAC1, and Bcl-xL expression in livers from healthy and DEN-treated mouse cancer-derived livers (n = 3). The fold increase in protein expression levels is also indicated. (E) Immunoblotting of TfR expression in noncancerous and liver cancer-derived cell lines. (F) R-Tf-D-LP4 effectively induced cell death of liver tumor cell lines. Human HepG2 (○), HuH7 (▲), and mouse BNL1MEA.7R.1 cells (●) were incubated for 6 hours with R-Tf-D-LP4, and cell death was analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. (G) IC50 values (μM) for peptide-induced apoptosis in liver tumor cell lines with the various indicated mutations [49]. Results show means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2R-Tf-D-LP4 induces cell death: mode of action.
R-Tf-D-LP4 induces detachment of HK-I-GFP (A) and endogenous HK-I in HepG2 cells analyzed by immunoblotting of cytosolic fraction and presented as relative units (B), as described in Materials and Methods. (C) R-Tf-D-LP4 reduces cellular ATP levels, assayed as described in Materials and Methods. Results show means ±SE (n = 3) (*P ≤ .05, **P ≤ .01). (D) R-Tf-D-LP4–induced Cyto c release from mitochondria was analyzed by immunoblotting cytosolic fraction as described in Materials and Methods. (E, F) R-Tf-D-LP4–induced apoptosis as analyzed by Annexin V-FITC and PI staining and flow cytometry. Representative FACS analysis of control and R-Tf-D-LP4 (5 μM)–treated HepG2 cells (E). Apoptosis as a function of R-Tf-D-LP4 concentration. Results show means ±SE (n = 3).
Figure 3VDAC1-based peptide R-Tf-D-LP4 inhibits tumor growth in a DEN-induced mouse liver cancer model. (A) A schematic presentation of DEN-induced liver cancer development and treatment schedule. (B) MRI of the abdomens of 42-week-old mice treated i.v. with HBSS or R-Tf-D-LP4 (18 mg/kg, n = 30) for 10 weeks as described in Materials and Methods. (C, D) Dissected (C) and weighed (D) livers from DEN-treated, peptide-untreated, and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated DEN-mice. (E) H&E staining of liver sections from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice [0, 10, 14 mg/kg (n = 8) and 18 mg/kg, n = 30]. (F) A higher magnification of H&E staining of liver sections from untreated (with the tumor indicated) and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice (18 mg/kg) is shown. The numbers of tumors per liver (G) and tumor areas (H) were measured with a Pannoramic MIDI, 3DHISTECH microscope (Pannoramic viewer, 3DHISTECH). (*P ≤ .05, ***P ≤ .001).
Figure 4VDAC1-based peptide R-Tf-D-LP4 inhibits tumor growth in a DEN-induced mouse liver cancer model in a late disease stage. (A) A schematic presentation of DEN-induced liver cancer development and treatment schedule, weeks 37 to 43. (B) Dissected livers at week 37 from R-Tf-D-LP4–untreated DEN-treated mice. (C) Dissected livers at week 43 from R-Tf-D-LP4–untreated DEN-treated mice. (D) Dissected livers at week 43 from R-Tf-D-LP4 (18 mg/kg)–treated DEN-treated mice. (E) The weight of livers from DEN-untreated (control) and DEN-treated mice treated with R-Tf-D-LP4 (18 mg/kg) and untreated. (F) The amount of tumor nodules in livers from DEN-treated mice untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4 treated (18 mg/kg) (**P ≤ .01, ***P ≤ .001).
Figure 5R-Tf-D-LP4 treatment of DEN-induced tumors reduces expression of metabolism-related enzymes and the proliferation marker Ki-67. (A) Representative liver sections from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice (18 mg/kg) stained with anti–Ki-67 antibodies and hematoxylin. (B) Quantitative analysis of Ki-67–positive cells (*P ≤ .05, ***P ≤ .001). Representative liver sections from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice were IHC stained for Glut-1, HK-II, GAPDH, and LDHA (C) and for VDAC1, citrate synthase, and ATP synthase 5a (D) using appropriate antibodies. Sections were also hematoxylin stained and visualized by microscopy (Leica DM2500). (E) Quantitative analysis of IHC-stained sections revealing intensity levels was carried out on panoramic scanner-generated images using HistoQuant software as described in Materials and Methods.
Figure 6R-Tf-D-LP4 treatment of DEN-exposed mice induces apoptosis and modifies the expression of apoptosis-related proteins. (A) Immunoblot of TfR expression in DEN-untreated and DEN-induced liver tumors in untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice analyzed by specific antibodies. β-Actin immunostaining is presented as a loading control. (B) TUNEL staining of liver sections from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated DEN-treated mice. Red and green colors indicate PI nuclear and TUNEL staining, respectively. (C) IHC of representative liver sections from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice stained with anti–Cyto c and anti-AIF antibodies. (D) Immunoblotting of liver lysates obtained from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice using anti–Cyto c, anti-AIF, anti–caspase-3, and anti–caspase-8 antibodies. (E) Quantitative analysis of the immunoblots as shown in (D) (n = 3). DEN-treated mice (black bars); DEN-treated mice and treated with the peptide (18 mg/kg) (gray bars).
Figure 7R-Tf-D-LP4 treatment of DEN-induced HCC eliminates hepatosteatotic pathology, inflammation, and fibrosis. (A-E) Representative liver sections from DEN-treated, R-Tf-D-LP4–untreated, or R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice stained with Sirius red (A) or anti–α-SMA (B) or anti-F4/80 antibodies (C) showing macrophage infiltration. IF staining for CD3+ and B220 (D), CD4+, CD8+, or FOXP3 (E). The relative staining intensity (%) is presented in each image. The results are from several images from two mice for each antibody staining. (F) Representative liver sections, H&E stained, demonstrate hepatosteatosis pathology in DEN-induced liver tumors that were absent in R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice.
Figure 8R-Tf-D-LP4 inhibits tumor growth in a metabolically (HFD-32) induced mouse hepatocellular carcinoma (NASH-HCC) model. (A) Schematic presentation of HFD-32–induced liver cancer development and treatment schedule. Mice were randomized into two groups. One group was treated i.v. with HBSS (control), and the second was treated with the R-Tf-D-LP4 (18 mg/kg) from week 16 until week 22, when the mice were sacrificed. (B) Dissected livers from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice (n = 10). (C) Liver sections from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice stained with H&E. Blue circles indicate the tumor. (D, E) The average number of tumors per liver and the relative tumor area were measured as in Figure 3F. Results show means ±SE (n = 5, ***P ≤ .001). (F) Representative liver sections from untreated and R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice stained with H&E showing steatosis and inflammation in peptide-untreated but not in R-Tf-D-LP4–treated mice.
Figure 9R-Tf-D-LP4 inhibits tumor growth in a HepG2 xenograft mouse model. (A) HepG2 cells were inoculated into athymic nude mice as described in Materials and Methods. When the tumor volume was 75 to 100 mm3, the mice were subdivided into two matched groups (five mice/group) and intratumorally injected every 2 days with HBSS (●, control) or R-Tf-D-LP4 (O, 40 μM). The calculated average tumor volumes are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). Dissected tumors (B) and their weights (C). Results show means ± SE (n = 11) (*P ≤ .05).