| Literature DB >> 29747151 |
Vivian F Silva Kahl1, Fernanda Rabaioli da Silva2, Jodel da Silva Alves1, Gabrieli Flesch da Silva1, Juliana Picinini1, Varinderpal Singh Dhillon3, Michael Fenech3, Melissa Rosa de Souza1, Johnny F Dias4, Claudia Telles de Souza4, Mirian Salvador5, Cátia Dos Santos Branco5, Flávia Valadão Thiesen6, Daniel Simon7, Juliana da Silva1.
Abstract
Tobacco farming has been proving to induce poor health outcomes in agricultural workers, genomic instability being the triggering one. This study evaluated influence of PON1 (paraoxonase 1), SOD2 (superoxide dismutase), OGG1 (8-oxoguanine glycosylase), XRCC1 (X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1), and XRCC4 (X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 4) genes polymorphisms on DNA damage in 121 subjects occupationally exposed to pesticides mixtures and nicotine at tobacco fields and 121 non-exposed individuals. Inorganic elements (Cl, P, S and Zn) and cotinine levels were found increased in farmers, confirming exposure. Results show higher frequencies of buccal micronucleus (MN), nuclear buds (NBUD), binucleated cells (BN) and damage index (comet assay), reduced telomere length (TL), and increased parameters of oxidative stress in farmers compared to non-exposed individuals. PON1 Gln/Gln genotype was associated with increased MN frequency. SOD2 Val/Val showed association with increased frequency of MN and NBUD and decreased antioxidant activity. The XRCC1 Arg/Arg showed protective effect for MN, BN and TL, which was also positively influenced by OGG1 -/Cys. MN was decreased in XRCC4 -/Ile farmers. These genotypes also showed a risk for antioxidant activity. Our study proposes that PON1 and SOD2 variants play a role in xenobiotic-metabolizing system in farmers, while base excision repair (BER) pathway could be the repair mechanism involved in genomic instability suffered by tobacco farmers.Entities:
Keywords: Buccal micronucleus; Comet assay; Genetic polymorphisms; Oxidative stress; Telomere length; Tobacco farmers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29747151 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ISSN: 0147-6513 Impact factor: 6.291