| Literature DB >> 29746558 |
Lianne J N Kraal1, Marieke L Nijland2, Kristine L Germar1, Dominique L P Baeten1, Ineke J M Ten Berge2, Cynthia M Fehres1.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of synovial joints, characterized by the presence of the highly disease-specific anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in approximately 70% of patients. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has previously been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of RA. However, given the high incidence of EBV in the general population and the difficulty of detecting initial infection, providing a direct link between EBV infection and RA development has remained elusive. We hypothesized that primary EBV infection may be a trigger for the development of the ACPA response in vivo. Using a unique cohort of 26 kidney transplant patients with a primary EBV infection, the presence of ACPA before and following infection was determined. No increase in IgG anti-CCP2 titers was detected following EBV infection. IgG anti-CCP2 antibodies were present in two patients and borderline positive in another. These three patients were HLA-DR4 negative. To test whether EBV infection may trigger a non-class switched anti-CCP2 response, IgM anti-CCP2 antibodies were analyzed. No general trend in the IgM anti-CCP2 response was observed following EBV infection. Since two out of the three IgG anti-CCP2 (borderline) positive patients were diagnosed with IgA nephropathy, 23 additional IgA nephropathy patients were tested for IgG anti-CCP2, regardless of their EBV status. All of these patients were IgG anti-CCP2 negative, indicating that IgG anti-CCP2 is not commonly present in IgA nephropathy patients. Collectively, these data do not support the hypothesis that EBV does trigger the highly RA specific ACPA response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29746558 PMCID: PMC5945038 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient characteristics kidney transplant patients with a primary EBV infection.
| n = 26 | |
|---|---|
| 18 (69) | |
| 37 (19–77) | |
| 7 (27) | |
| 9 (38) | |
| 3 (1–35) | |
| 1 (0–34) |
EBV-antibody responses and EBV viral load detection by qPCR.
| Positive | Negative | |
|---|---|---|
| 12/26 | 14/26 | |
| 21/26 | 3/26 | |
| 8/26 | 18/26 | |
| 23/25 | 2/25 |
*These three patients never had any antibody response against EBV, only qPCR was positive.
** In these two patients a positive EBV viral load was never detected, although they did show conversion to positive EBV serology.
Fig 1IgG and IgM anti-CCP2 antibody expression in serum.
Time points are (1) the first available time point before EBV infection, (2) the first time point with a positive EBV viral load or serology, (3) the first available time point after time point 2. (A) IgG anti-CCP2 antibody levels of all tested patients (n = 26) in arbitrary units as defined by the IMMUNOSCAN CCPlus test. Values above 25 U/ml, represented by a dotted line, are considered to be positive. (B) IgM anti-CCP2 antibody levels of all tested patients (n = 26) in arbitrary units.
Fig 2OD values for the IgG and IgM anti-CCP2 antibodies compared to the IgG and IgM anti-arginine2 antibody controls.
Patients previously tested positive for IgG (n = 2) or IgM anti-CCP2 (n = 10) antibodies were additionally tested for IgG respectively IgM anti-arginine2 antibodies. (A) IgG anti-CCP2 and IgG anti-arginine2 antibody levels. (B) IgM anti-CCP2 and IgM anti-arginine2 antibody levels. Patient numbers are depicted on the x-axis.
Characteristics of the additional IgA nephropathy patients.
| n = 23 | |
|---|---|
| 22 (96) | |
| 45 (27–68) | |
| 11 (48) | |
| 5 (28) | |
| 0 (-267–24) |