Literature DB >> 29746369

Survival-related Selection Bias in Studies of Racial Health Disparities: The Importance of the Target Population and Study Design.

Chanelle J Howe1, Whitney R Robinson2,3.   

Abstract

The impact of survival-related selection bias has not always been discussed in relevant studies of racial health disparities. Moreover, the analytic approaches most frequently employed in the epidemiologic literature to minimize selection bias are difficult to implement appropriately in racial disparities research. This difficulty stems from the fact that frequently employed analytic techniques require that common causes of survival and the outcome are accurately measured. Unfortunately, such common causes are often unmeasured or poorly measured in racial health disparities studies. In the absence of accurate measures of the aforementioned common causes, redefining the target population or changing the study design represents a useful approach for reducing the extent of survival-related selection bias. To help researchers recognize and minimize survival-related selection bias in racial health disparities studies, we illustrate the aforementioned selection bias and how redefining the target population or changing the study design can be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29746369      PMCID: PMC5985150          DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  22 in total

1.  Commentary: Weighing up the dead and missing: reflections on inverse-probability weighting and principal stratification to address truncation by death.

Authors:  Basile Chaix; David Evans; Juan Merlo; Etsuji Suzuki
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Trends in the black-white life expectancy gap, 2003-2008.

Authors:  Sam Harper; Dinela Rushani; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prehypertension, racial prevalence and its association with risk factors: Analysis of the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  Stephen P Glasser; Suzanne Judd; Jan Basile; Dan Lackland; Jewell Halanych; Mary Cushman; Ronald Prineas; Virginia Howard; George Howard
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 4.  Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines.

Authors:  N Krieger; D R Williams; N E Moss
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Reducing HIV Racial/Ethnic Disparities: What's Good Data Got to Do with It?

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Everybody's Doin' It (Right?): Neighborhood Norms and Sexual Activity in Adolescence.

Authors:  Tara D Warner; Peggy C Giordano; Wendy D Manning; Monica A Longmore
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2011-11-01

7.  Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Estimation of the standardized risk difference and ratio in a competing risks framework: application to injection drug use and progression to AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Joseph J Eron; M Alan Brookhart; Mari M Kitahata; Jeffrey N Martin; William C Mathews; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Neighborhoods and HIV: a social ecological approach to prevention and care.

Authors:  Carl A Latkin; Danielle German; David Vlahov; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2013 May-Jun

10.  Evaluating the Population Impact on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in HIV in Adulthood of Intervening on Specific Targets: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Akilah Dulin-Keita; Stephen R Cole; Joseph W Hogan; Bryan Lau; Richard D Moore; W Christopher Mathews; Heidi M Crane; Daniel R Drozd; Elvin Geng; Stephen L Boswell; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.363

View more
  3 in total

1.  Invited Commentary: Making Causal Inference More Social and (Social) Epidemiology More Causal.

Authors:  John W Jackson; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Invited Commentary: Counterfactuals in Social Epidemiology-Thinking Outside of "the Box".

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Toward a Clearer Definition of Selection Bias When Estimating Causal Effects.

Authors:  Haidong Lu; Stephen R Cole; Chanelle J Howe; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.860

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.