Literature DB >> 29746252

Establishing normal values of total testosterone in adult healthy men by the use of four immunometric methods and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Giacomo Montagna1, Samuela Balestra2, Federica D'Aurizio3, Francesco Romanelli4, Cinzia Benagli2, Renato Tozzoli5, Lorenz Risch6,7,8, Luca Giovanella9,10,11, Mauro Imperiali2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The total testosterone (T) cutoffs clinically adopted to define late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) do not consider the differences that exist between different analytical platforms, nor do they consider the body mass index (BMI) or age of the patient. We aimed at providing method, age and BMI-specific normal values for total T in European healthy men.
METHODS: A total of 351 eugonadal healthy men were recruited, and total T was measured with four automated immunometric assays (IMAs): ARCHITECT i1000SR (Abbott), UniCel DxI800 (Beckman Coulter), Cobas e601 (Roche), IMMULITE 2000 (Siemens) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Reference ranges (RRs) were calculated for each method.
RESULTS: Passing and Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plot showed an acceptable agreement between Abbott and LC-MS/MS, but a poor one between LC-MS/MS and the other IMAs. Age-specific T concentrations in non-obese (BMI <29.9 kg/m2) men were greater than in all men. The total T normal range, in non-obese men aged 18-39 years, measured with LC-MS/MS was 9.038-41.310 nmol/L. RRs calculated with LC-MS/MS statistically differed from the ones calculated with all individual IMAs, except Abbott and among all IMAs. Statistically significant differences for both upper and lower reference limits between our RRs and the ones provided by the manufacturers were also noticed.
CONCLUSIONS: We calculated normal ranges in a non-obese cohort of European men, aged 18-39 years, with four commercially available IMAs and LC-MS/MS and found statistically significant differences according to the analytical method used. Method-specific reference values can increase the accuracy of LOH diagnosis and should be standardly used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; body mass index; late-onset hypogonadism (LOH); reference ranges; testosterone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29746252     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Monitoring testosterone replacement therapy with transdermal gel: when and how?

Authors:  A Sansone; M Sansone; R Selleri; A Schiavo; D Gianfrilli; C Pozza; M Zitzmann; A Lenzi; F Romanelli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Association of low testosterone with changes in non-cardiovascular biomarkers in adult men.

Authors:  Michael Samoszuk; Abraham Morgentaler; Mark de Groot; Wouter van Solinge; Yu Li; Fiona Adair; Imo Hoefer; Saskia Haitjema
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Testosterone status following short-term, severe energy deficit is associated with fat-free mass loss in U.S. Marines.

Authors:  Claire E Berryman; Holly L McClung; John J Sepowitz; Erin Gaffney-Stomberg; Arny A Ferrando; James P McClung; Stefan M Pasiakos
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-09

4.  Functional Status of Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid and Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axes in Hospitalized Schizophrenics in Shanghai.

Authors:  Yuncheng Zhu; Haifeng Ji; Lily Tao; Qing Cai; Fang Wang; Weidong Ji; Guohai Li; Yiru Fang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.