Literature DB >> 29746227

Comparison of an Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor With Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Patients With Cancer With Venous Thromboembolism: Results of a Randomized Trial (SELECT-D).

Annie M Young1, Andrea Marshall1, Jenny Thirlwall1, Oliver Chapman1, Anand Lokare1, Catherine Hill1, Danielle Hale1, Janet A Dunn1, Gary H Lyman1, Charles Hutchinson1, Peter MacCallum1, Ajay Kakkar1, F D Richard Hobbs1, Stavros Petrou1, Jeremy Dale1, Christopher J Poole1, Anthony Maraveyas1, Mark Levine1.   

Abstract

Purpose Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer. Long-term daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin has been standard treatment for such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess if an oral factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, would offer an alternative treatment for VTE in patients with cancer. Patient and Methods In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, pilot trial in the United Kingdom, patients with active cancer who had symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), incidental PE, or symptomatic lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were recruited. Allocation was to dalteparin (200 IU/kg daily during month 1, then 150 IU/kg daily for months 2-6) or rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, then 20 mg once daily for a total of 6 months). The primary outcome was VTE recurrence over 6 months. Safety was assessed by major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). A sample size of 400 patients would provide estimates of VTE recurrence to within ± 4.5%, assuming a VTE recurrence rate at 6 months of 10%. Results A total of 203 patients were randomly assigned to each group, 58% of whom had metastases. Twenty-six patients experienced recurrent VTE (dalteparin, n = 18; rivaroxaban, n = 8). The 6-month cumulative VTE recurrence rate was 11% (95% CI, 7% to 16%) with dalteparin and 4% (95% CI, 2% to 9%) with rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.99). The 6-month cumulative rate of major bleeding was 4% (95% CI, 2% to 8%) for dalteparin and 6% (95% CI, 3% to 11%) for rivaroxaban (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.96). Corresponding rates of CRNMB were 4% (95% CI, 2% to 9%) and 13% (95% CI, 9% to 19%), respectively (HR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.63 to 8.69). Conclusion Rivaroxaban was associated with relatively low VTE recurrence but higher CRNMB compared with dalteparin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29746227     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.8034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  224 in total

Review 1.  Venous Thromboembolism Treatment and Prevention in Cancer Patients: Can We Use Pills Yet?

Authors:  Tulsi Patel; David A Iglesias
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 2.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Breadth of complications of long-term oral anticoagulant care.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Marco Donadini
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

4.  SEOM clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2019).

Authors:  A J Muñoz Martín; E Gallardo Díaz; I García Escobar; R Macías Montero; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón Olmos; P Pérez Segura; T Quintanar Verdúguez; M Salgado Fernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Vascular Toxicity in Patients with Cancer: Is There a Recipe to Clarify Treatment? CME.

Authors:  Jose Alvarez-Cardona; Joshua Mitchell; Daniel Lenihan
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

6.  Direct oral anticoagulants in gastrointestinal malignancies: is the convenience worth the risk?

Authors:  Namisha Thapa; Joseph Shatzel; Thomas G Deloughery; Sven R Olson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

Review 7.  Biosimilars of low molecular weight heparins: Relevant background information for your drug formulary.

Authors:  Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep; Maarten J Beinema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Skewed Recommendations Due to Conflicts of Interest.

Authors:  Gisela Schott; Niklas Schurig; Manja Dannenberg; Hans Wille
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Correspondence to: Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part II. The Consensus for Pulmonary Embolism and Updates.

Authors:  Yu-Yun Shao; Hung-Ju Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.672

10.  Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Clinical Significance and Endovascular Interventions.

Authors:  Xin Li; Sasan Partovi; Sameer Gadani; Charles Martin; Avi Beck; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Dig Dis Interv       Date:  2020-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.