Literature DB >> 29746150

Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic and Extra-Anatomic Reconstruction Techniques Using Local Grafts for Chronic Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint.

Malo Le Hanneur1,2, Andrew Thoreson1, Damien Delgrande3, Thibault Lafosse2, Jean-David Werthel3, Philippe Hardy4,3, Bassem Elhassan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anatomic reconstruction techniques are increasingly used to address cases of acromioclavicular (AC) joint chronic instability. These usually involve an additional surgical site for autograft harvesting or an allograft.
PURPOSE: To describe a triple-bundle (TB) anatomic reconstruction using on-site autografts, the semiconjoint tendon (SCT) and the coracoacromial ligament (CAL), and compare its primary stability to the native AC joint ligamentous complex and to a modified Weaver-Dunn (WD) reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Intact AC joints of 12 paired cadaveric shoulders were tested for anterior, posterior, and superior translations under cyclic loading with a servo-hydraulic testing system. One shoulder from each pair was randomly assigned to the TB group, where 2 SCT strips were used to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligaments while the distal end of the CAL was transferred to the distal extremity of the clavicle to reconstruct the AC ligaments; the other shoulder received a modified WD reconstruction. After reconstruction, the same translational testing was performed, with an additional load-to-failure test in the superior direction.
RESULTS: In both the TB and the WD groups, no significant differences were found before and after reconstruction in terms of joint displacements after cyclic loading, in all 3 directions. Compared with the WD reconstruction, the TB repair resulted in significantly lower displacements in both the anterior (ie, 2.59 ± 1.08 mm, P = .011) and posterior (ie, 10.17 ± 6.24 mm, P = .014) directions, but not in the superior direction. No significant differences were observed between the 2 reconstructions during the load-to-failure testing, except for the displacement to failure, which was significantly smaller (ie, 5.34 ± 2.97 mm) in the WD group ( P = .037).
CONCLUSION: Anterior, posterior, and superior displacements after an anatomic reconstruction of the AC joint complex using the SCT and CAL as graft material were similar to those of native AC joints and significantly smaller in the axial plane than those of AC joints after a WD repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An anatomic reconstruction is achievable using the CAL and the SCT as on-site graft materials, providing satisfactory initial stability and thereby allowing earlier mobilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromioclavicular joint; anatomic reconstruction; biceps; conjoint tendon; coracoacromial ligament

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29746150     DOI: 10.1177/0363546518770603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Instability With a Tunnel-Free Reconstruction Technique.

Authors:  Michelle M Gosselin; Brandon S Denney; James M Gregory
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 2.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.

Authors:  Marcel Js Tamaoki; Mário Lenza; Fabio T Matsunaga; João Carlos Belloti; Marcelo H Matsumoto; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 3.  Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Theodorakys Marín Fermín; Jean Michel Hovsepian; Víctor Miguel Rodrigues Fernandes; Ioannis Terzidis; Emmanouil Papakostas; Jason Koh
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

4.  Arthroscopic Coracoacromial Ligament Transfer Augmented With Suspensory V-Shaped Fixation System for Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Jean Kany; Hisham Anis Selim
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-06-11

5.  A New Coracoclavicular Guider for Minimally Invasive Anatomic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction with Two TightRope Systems in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Lei Tan; Wan Tang; Tiecheng Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Rotator Cuff Repair Using Coracoacromial Ligament Autograft for Supraspinatus Footprint Augmentation.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Michael Powers; Orr Limpisvasti
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-01-20

7.  Treatment of Failed Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstructions: Primary Acromioclavicular Ligament and Capsular Reconstruction and Revision Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Toufic R Jildeh; Annalise M Peebles; Justin R Brown; Mitchell S Mologne; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-07-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.