BACKGROUND:Mechanical efficiency (ME) refers to the ability of an individual to transfer energy consumed by external work. A decreased ME, could represent an increased energy cost during exercise and may, therefore, be limited in terms of physical activity. This study aimed to compare the influence of two different exercise protocols: moderate continuous training (MCT) versus high intensity interval training (HIIT), as part of a cardiac rehabilitation program on ME values among coronary patients. METHODS:One hundred and ten coronary patients were assigned to either HIIT or MCT groups for 8 weeks. Incremental exercise tests in a cycle ergometer were performed to obtain VO2peak. Net energy expenditure (EE) and ME were obtained at intensities corresponding to the first (VT1) and second (VT2) ventilatory thresholds, and at VO2peak. RESULTS: Both exercise programs significantly increase VO2peak with a higher increase in the HIIT group (2.96 ± 2.33 mL/kg/min vs. 3.88 ± 2.40 mL/kg/min, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The ME at VO2peak and VT2 only significantly increased in the HIIT group. At VT1, ME significantly increased in both groups, with a greater increase in the HIIT group (2.20 ± ± 6.25% vs. 5.52 ± 5.53%, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of HIIT to patients with chronic ischemic heart disease of low risk re- sulted in a greater improvement in VO2peak and in ME at VT1, than whenMCT was applied. Moreover, only the application of HIIT brought about a significant increase in ME at VT2 and at VO2peak.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Mechanical efficiency (ME) refers to the ability of an individual to transfer energy consumed by external work. A decreased ME, could represent an increased energy cost during exercise and may, therefore, be limited in terms of physical activity. This study aimed to compare the influence of two different exercise protocols: moderate continuous training (MCT) versus high intensity interval training (HIIT), as part of a cardiac rehabilitation program on ME values among coronary patients. METHODS: One hundred and ten coronary patients were assigned to either HIIT or MCT groups for 8 weeks. Incremental exercise tests in a cycle ergometer were performed to obtain VO2peak. Net energy expenditure (EE) and ME were obtained at intensities corresponding to the first (VT1) and second (VT2) ventilatory thresholds, and at VO2peak. RESULTS: Both exercise programs significantly increase VO2peak with a higher increase in the HIIT group (2.96 ± 2.33 mL/kg/min vs. 3.88 ± 2.40 mL/kg/min, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The ME at VO2peak and VT2 only significantly increased in the HIIT group. At VT1, ME significantly increased in both groups, with a greater increase in the HIIT group (2.20 ± ± 6.25% vs. 5.52 ± 5.53%, for patients of the MCT and HIIT groups, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of HIIT to patients with chronic ischemic heart disease of low risk re- sulted in a greater improvement in VO2peak and in ME at VT1, than when MCT was applied. Moreover, only the application of HIIT brought about a significant increase in ME at VT2 and at VO2peak.
Entities:
Keywords:
cardiopulmonary exercise test; coronary artery disease; energy expenditure; high interval training; mechanical efficiency
Authors: Darren E R Warburton; Donald C McKenzie; Mark J Haykowsky; Arlana Taylor; Paula Shoemaker; Andrew P Ignaszewski; Sammy Y Chan Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gwenael Layec; Luke J Haseler; Jan Hoff; Russell S Richardson Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Katharine D Currie; Jonathan B Dubberley; Robert S McKelvie; Maureen J MacDonald Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: R Hambrecht; J Niebauer; E Fiehn; B Kälberer; B Offner; K Hauer; U Riede; G Schlierf; W Kübler; G Schuler Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Cristina Blasco-Lafarga; Jordi Monferrer-Marín; Ainoa Roldán; Pablo Monteagudo; Ivan Chulvi-Medrano Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 4.755