Literature DB >> 29745714

What do short-term and long-term relationships look like? Building the relationship coordination and strategic timing (ReCAST) model.

Paul W Eastwick1, Elizabeth Keneski2, Taylor A Morgan2, Meagan A McDonald2, Sabrina A Huang1.   

Abstract

Close relationships research has examined committed couples (e.g., dating relationships, marriages) using intensive methods that plot relationship development over time. But a substantial proportion of people's real-life sexual experiences take place (a) before committed relationships become "official" and (b) in short-term relationships; methods that document the time course of relationships have rarely been applied to these contexts. We adapted a classic relationship trajectory-plotting technique to generate the first empirical comparisons between the features of people's real-life short-term and long-term relationships across their entire timespan. Five studies compared long-term and short-term relationships in terms of the timing of relationship milestones (e.g., flirting, first sexual intercourse) and the occurrence/intensity of important relationship experiences (e.g., romantic interest, strong sexual desire, attachment). As romantic interest was rising and partners were becoming acquainted, long-term and short-term relationships were indistinguishable. Eventually, romantic interest in short-term relationships plateaued and declined while romantic interest in long-term relationships continued to rise, ultimately reaching a higher peak. As relationships progressed, participants evidenced more features characteristic of the attachment-behavioral system (e.g., attachment, caregiving) in long-term than short-term relationships but similar levels of other features (e.g., sexual desire, self-promotion, intrasexual competition). These data inform a new synthesis of close relationships and evolutionary psychological perspectives called the Relationship Coordination and Strategic Timing (ReCAST) model. ReCAST depicts short-term and long-term relationships as partially overlapping trajectories (rather than relationships initiated with distinct strategies) that differ in their progression along a normative relationship development sequence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29745714     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  3 in total

Review 1.  Romantic Attachment and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation on Dyadic Adjustment: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Marisalva Fávero; Lúcia Lemos; Diana Moreira; Filipe Nunes Ribeiro; Valéria Sousa-Gomes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-13

2.  The Friends-to-Lovers Pathway to Romance: Prevalent, Preferred, and Overlooked by Science.

Authors:  Danu Anthony Stinson; Jessica J Cameron; Lisa B Hoplock
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2021-07-12

3.  We're Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships.

Authors:  Samantha Joel; Geoff MacDonald
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-07-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.