Literature DB >> 29745684

Parallel analysis with categorical variables: Impact of category probability proportions on dimensionality assessment accuracy.

Dirk Lubbe1.   

Abstract

Parallel analysis (PA) is regarded as one of the most accurate methods to determine the number of factors underlying a set of variables. Commonly, PA is performed on the basis of the variables' product-moment correlation matrix. To improve dimensionality assessments for dichotomous or ordered categorical variables, it has been proposed to replace product-moment correlations with more appropriate coefficients, such as tetrachoric or polychoric correlations. While similar modifications have proven useful for various factor analytic approaches, PA results were not consistently improved. The present article outlines a main reason for this result. Specifically, it explains the dependency of PA results on differing proportions of category probabilities when using tetrachoric or polychoric correlations and shows how to adjust for it by generating appropriate reference eigenvalues. The accuracy of dimensionality assessments of PA accounting for category probability proportions versus not accounting for them is investigated using simulation studies. The results show that the category probability adjusted approach distinctly improves dimensionality assessments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29745684     DOI: 10.1037/met0000171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  6 in total

1.  Increased inflammation predicts nine-year change in major depressive disorder diagnostic status.

Authors:  Nur Hani Zainal; Michelle G Newman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2021-10-07

2.  Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial.

Authors:  Hudson Golino; Dingjing Shi; Alexander P Christensen; Luis Eduardo Garrido; Maria Dolores Nieto; Ritu Sadana; Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; Agustin Martinez-Molina
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2020-03-19

3.  Searching for G: A New Evaluation of SPM-LS Dimensionality.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Garzon; Francisco J Abad; Luis E Garrido
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2019-06-28

4.  Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS): psychometric properties in two Internet-based studies.

Authors:  Paul Frewen; Ian McPhail; Ulrich Schnyder; Misari Oe; Miranda Olff
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2021-06-25

5.  Development and Validation of the HL6: a Brief, Technology-Based Remote Measure of Health Literacy.

Authors:  Stacy Cooper Bailey; James W Griffith; Chandana Vuyyuru; Stephanie Batio; Evelyn Velazquez; Delesha M Carpenter; Terry C Davis; Ruth M Parker; Michelle Taddeo; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  Item response theory and differential test functioning analysis of the HBSC-Symptom-Checklist across 46 countries.

Authors:  Andreas Heinz; Philipp E Sischka; Carolina Catunda; Alina Cosma; Irene García-Moya; Nelli Lyyra; Anne Kaman; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; William Pickett
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.612

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.