Literature DB >> 29745296

Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach.

Kengo Nagashima1, Hisashi Noma2, Toshi A Furukawa3.   

Abstract

Prediction intervals are commonly used in meta-analysis with random-effects models. One widely used method, the Higgins-Thompson-Spiegelhalter prediction interval, replaces the heterogeneity parameter with its point estimate, but its validity strongly depends on a large sample approximation. This is a weakness in meta-analyses with few studies. We propose an alternative based on bootstrap and show by simulations that its coverage is close to the nominal level, unlike the Higgins-Thompson-Spiegelhalter method and its extensions. The proposed method was applied in three meta-analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidence distributions; coverage properties; meta-analysis; prediction intervals; random-effects models

Year:  2018        PMID: 29745296     DOI: 10.1177/0962280218773520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  9 in total

1.  Methodological issues in the designing and reporting of frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis to assess COVID-19 outcomes among PLHIV with various comorbidities.

Authors:  Ram Bajpai; Vivek Verma; Gyan Prakash Singh
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 6.707

Review 2.  Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Propensity Score-Matched Studies.

Authors:  Khi Yung Fong; Colin Jun Rong Ng; Yue Wang; Colin Yeo; Vern Hsen Tan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  A Guide to Estimating the Reference Range From a Meta-Analysis Using Aggregate or Individual Participant Data.

Authors:  Lianne Siegel; M Hassan Murad; Richard D Riley; Fateh Bazerbachi; Zhen Wang; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.363

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for distal malignant obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Corey S Miller; Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel; Yen-I Chen
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-11-11

5.  Message Design Choices Don't Make Much Difference to Persuasiveness and Can't Be Counted On-Not Even When Moderating Conditions Are Specified.

Authors:  Daniel J O'Keefe; Hans Hoeken
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-29

6.  Prevalence of Mycobacterium leprae in armadillos in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrícia Deps; João Marcelo Antunes; Adalberto Rezende Santos; Simon M Collin
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 7.  Circulating FABP4, nesfatin-1, and osteocalcin concentrations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianran Sun; Dai Zhang; Jiang Xu; Chao Chen; Datong Deng; Faming Pan; Lin Dong; Sumei Li; Shandong Ye
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  The Role of Diet in Prognosis among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Dietary Patterns and Diet Interventions.

Authors:  Carlota Castro-Espin; Antonio Agudo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Exploring consequences of simulation design for apparent performance of methods of meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elena Kulinskaya; David C Hoaglin; Ilyas Bakbergenuly
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.021

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.