Literature DB >> 29744891

What makes working memory traces stable over time?

Gabriel Jarjat1, Violette Hoareau2, Gaën Plancher3, Pascal Hot1, Benoît Lemaire2, Sophie Portrat3.   

Abstract

Understanding the factors that make working memory (WM) traces stable over time is important because WM is the keystone of general cognitive achievement. Two views of attentional WM maintenance have been suggested to account for the long-term retention of WM information. First, the distractors in a WM task are thought to foster the creation of episodic memory cues through covert retrieval. Second, the cognitive load (CL) of the distractors is thought to vary long-term memory instantiation. In this study, we propose an additional parsimonious perspective: the total time during which each trace is under the control of attention in WM is the key to long-term retention. Participants performed a complex span task in which the CL and number of distractors were orthogonally manipulated, and thereafter the participants performed a delayed recall test. Similar to previous findings, the results showed effects of the number of distractors and of CL on delayed recall. Our results went further, however, by showing a non-linear relationship between delayed recall performance and the free time accumulated between encoding and immediate recall. The role of time in episodic memory performance and the underlying WM maintenance mechanism are discussed.
© 2018 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive load; complex span task; delayed recall; episodic memory; refreshing; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29744891     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  4 in total

1.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

2.  Using More Ecological Paradigms to Investigate Working Memory: Strengths, Limitations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Lison Fanuel; Gaën Plancher; Pascale Piolino
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The long-term consequences of retrieval demands during working memory.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; Charlotte Doherty; Paul Howlett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01

4.  Individual differences in working memory capacity moderate effects of post-learning activity on memory consolidation over the long term.

Authors:  Markus Martini; Robert Marhenke; Caroline Martini; Sonja Rossi; Pierre Sachse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.