OBJECTIVES: The goals of the present study were as follows: (i) to explore the characteristics of the Flemish Public Centers for Social Welfare (PCSW) concerning oral health care; (ii) to explore possible barriers experienced by people on social assistance and oral health-care providers; and (iii) to explore the accessibility of general and oral health care for people on social assistance. METHODS: The data of this cross-sectional study were obtained by a survey of social service providers working in a PCSW. For this purpose, a new questionnaire was developed. The survey was validated by means of a pilot study. All 306 PCSWs in Flanders were invited to participate in this survey, of which 192 (62.7%) responded. RESULTS: The findings demonstrate that for people on social assistance, financial limitations and low prioritisation of oral health are the main barriers to good oral health care. The study reveals that such individuals experience greater financial barriers and poorer access to a dentist than to a general medical practitioner. The study also reveals that dentists report financial concerns and administrative burdens as the main barriers in treating this subgroup. The responses of PCSWs demonstrate that local dentists are reluctant to treat this subgroup. CONCLUSION: Additional efforts are needed to improve the accessibility of oral health care for people on social assistance. Recommended improvements at the organisational level could improve increased education to target the population on the importance of oral health care. Administrative burden and financial concerns of the providers also need to be addressed to decrease their reluctance to work with those on social assistance.
OBJECTIVES: The goals of the present study were as follows: (i) to explore the characteristics of the Flemish Public Centers for Social Welfare (PCSW) concerning oral health care; (ii) to explore possible barriers experienced by people on social assistance and oral health-care providers; and (iii) to explore the accessibility of general and oral health care for people on social assistance. METHODS: The data of this cross-sectional study were obtained by a survey of social service providers working in a PCSW. For this purpose, a new questionnaire was developed. The survey was validated by means of a pilot study. All 306 PCSWs in Flanders were invited to participate in this survey, of which 192 (62.7%) responded. RESULTS: The findings demonstrate that for people on social assistance, financial limitations and low prioritisation of oral health are the main barriers to good oral health care. The study reveals that such individuals experience greater financial barriers and poorer access to a dentist than to a general medical practitioner. The study also reveals that dentists report financial concerns and administrative burdens as the main barriers in treating this subgroup. The responses of PCSWs demonstrate that local dentists are reluctant to treat this subgroup. CONCLUSION: Additional efforts are needed to improve the accessibility of oral health care for people on social assistance. Recommended improvements at the organisational level could improve increased education to target the population on the importance of oral health care. Administrative burden and financial concerns of the providers also need to be addressed to decrease their reluctance to work with those on social assistance.
Authors: Christophe Bedos; Christine Loignon; Anne Landry; Paul J Allison; Lucie Richard Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 2.655