Shashank Bhargava1, Paulo R Cunha2, Jennifer Lee3, George Kroumpouzos4,5,6. 1. Department of Dermatology, R.D. Gardi Medical College and C.R. Gardi Hospital, Ujjain, India. 2. Department of Dermatology, Medical School of Jundiaí, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 4. Department of Dermatology, Medical School of Jundiaí, São Paulo, Brazil. gk@gkderm.com. 5. Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. gk@gkderm.com. 6. Department of Dermatology, Rhode Island Hospital, APC 10, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, USA. gk@gkderm.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modalities for atrophic acne scarring can be classified depending upon the needs they satisfy; that is, resurfacing, lifting/volumization, tightening, or surgical removal/movement of tissue that is required for correction. A plethora of treatment options have resulted from the need to treat various acne scar types, variability of responses noted in various skin types, and increasing popularity of minimally invasive modalities. Still, there is a lack of consensus guidelines on treatment or combination therapies for various clinical scenarios. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review includes a critical evaluation of the evidence relevant to these modalities and various multimodality therapies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and EMBASE databases for studies on acne scar management. Also, we checked the reference lists of included studies and review articles for further studies. A total of 89 studies were included in our quality of evidence evaluation. RESULTS: The efficacy of lasers and radiofrequency in atrophic acne scarring is confirmed by many comparative and observational studies. Other modalities can be used as an adjunct, the choice of which depends on the type, severity, and number of atrophic scars. Minimally invasive procedures, such as fractional radiofrequency and needling, provide good outcomes with negligible risks in patients with dark or sensitive skin types. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high-quality data. Fractional lasers and radiofrequency offer significant improvement in most types of atrophic acne scars with minimal risks and can be combined with all other treatment options. Combination therapies typically provide superior outcomes than solo treatments.
BACKGROUND: Modalities for atrophic acne scarring can be classified depending upon the needs they satisfy; that is, resurfacing, lifting/volumization, tightening, or surgical removal/movement of tissue that is required for correction. A plethora of treatment options have resulted from the need to treat various acne scar types, variability of responses noted in various skin types, and increasing popularity of minimally invasive modalities. Still, there is a lack of consensus guidelines on treatment or combination therapies for various clinical scenarios. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review includes a critical evaluation of the evidence relevant to these modalities and various multimodality therapies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and EMBASE databases for studies on acne scar management. Also, we checked the reference lists of included studies and review articles for further studies. A total of 89 studies were included in our quality of evidence evaluation. RESULTS: The efficacy of lasers and radiofrequency in atrophic acne scarring is confirmed by many comparative and observational studies. Other modalities can be used as an adjunct, the choice of which depends on the type, severity, and number of atrophic scars. Minimally invasive procedures, such as fractional radiofrequency and needling, provide good outcomes with negligible risks in patients with dark or sensitive skin types. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high-quality data. Fractional lasers and radiofrequency offer significant improvement in most types of atrophic acne scars with minimal risks and can be combined with all other treatment options. Combination therapies typically provide superior outcomes than solo treatments.