Literature DB >> 29744754

Less is more: similar efficacy in three sessions and seven sessions of pulsed dye laser treatment in infantile port-wine stain patients.

Jiafang Zhu1,2, Wenxin Yu1,2, Tianyou Wang1,2, Yijie Chen1,2, Dongze Lyu1, Lei Chang1,2, Gang Ma3, Xiaoxi Lin4.   

Abstract

Port-wine stains (PWS) affect 0.3 to 0.5% of newborns and pulsed dye laser (PDL) remains the treatment of choice. However, no reliable study regarding the benefits of more frequent has been conducted. We designed the present study to evaluate whether more frequent PDL treatments in infantile patients would achieve further lightening of erythema. We prospectively investigated 20 infants with PWS. Two adjacent sites were both treated for a 12-week duration and randomly allocated to be treated for seven sessions at 2-week intervals or three sessions at 6-week intervals. The efficacy outcome 2 months after the final treatment was determined by visual and chromameter evaluation. Sixteen patients completed the study with a total of 54 treatment sites. Similar results were observed in the two groups. The average blanching rates were 42.93% (SD = 27.92%) and 43.81% (SD = 32.80%) for PDL treatments with seven and three sessions, respectively (p = 0.374). Partial recovery from the laser treatment was more frequently observed and side effects were significantly higher at 2-week follow-ups (p < 0.001), resulting in a total of 3-13 weeks for skin recovery. More frequent PDL treatments do not necessarily increase efficacy in infantile PWS patients. Considering the potential risks and added costs, this practice may not be of benefit. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR-ONC-17010857).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infant; Port-wine stains; Pulsed dye laser; Treatment intervals; Treatment sessions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29744754     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-2525-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  34 in total

Review 1.  New approaches to the laser treatment of vascular lesions.

Authors:  J S Dover
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.875

2.  Split-face comparison of intense pulsed light with short- and long-pulsed dye lasers for the treatment of port-wine stains.

Authors:  Philipp Babilas; Stephan Schreml; Tatiana Eames; Ulrich Hohenleutner; Rolf-Markus Szeimies; Michael Landthaler
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 3.  Treatment of pulsed dye laser-resistant port wine stain birthmarks.

Authors:  Zaid F Jasim; Julian M Handley
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  Port-wine stains unresponsive to pulsed dye laser: explanations and solutions.

Authors:  S W Lanigan
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Dynamic epidermal cooling in conjunction with laser-induced photothermolysis of port wine stain blood vessels.

Authors:  J S Nelson; T E Milner; B Anvari; B S Tanenbaum; L O Svaasand; S Kimel
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Investigation into optimal treatment intervals of facial port-wine stains using the pulsed dye laser.

Authors:  Robert Anolik; Tracey Newlove; Elliot T Weiss; Lori Brightman; Elizabeth K Hale; Julie K Karen; Leonard Bernstein; Roy G Geronemus
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Repetitive pulsed dye laser treatments improve persistent port-wine stains.

Authors:  A N Kauvar; R G Geronemus
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.398

8.  Treatment of port wine stains with photodynamic therapy, using pulsed dye laser as a light source, compared with pulsed dye laser alone: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alun V Evans; Alistair Robson; Richard J Barlow; Habib A Kurwa
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Treatment of port-wine stains during childhood with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser.

Authors:  B A Reyes; R Geronemus
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  The treatment of port-wine stains with the pulsed-dye laser at 2-week and 6-week intervals: a comparative study.

Authors:  N Tomson; S P R Lim; A Abdullah; S W Lanigan
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.302

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does interval time between pulsed dye laser treatments for port-wine stains influence outcome? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Igor Snast; Moshe Lapidoth; Ran Kaftory; Adi Nosrati; Emmilia Hodak; Daniel Mimouni; Efrat Solomon-Cohen; Assi Levi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Clinical outcome measures and scoring systems used in prospective studies of port wine stains: A systematic review.

Authors:  M Ingmar van Raath; Sandeep Chohan; Albert Wolkerstorfer; Chantal M A M van der Horst; Jacqueline Limpens; Xuan Huang; Baoyue Ding; Gert Storm; René R W J van der Hulst; Michal Heger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Site-specific pharmaco-laser therapy: A novel treatment modality for refractory port wine stains.

Authors:  M Ingmar van Raath; Jojanneke E van Amesfoort; Martin Hermann; Yasin Ince; Maurice J Zwart; Agustina V Echague; Yan Chen; Baoyue Ding; Xuan Huang; Gert Storm; Michal Heger
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2019-05-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.