BACKGROUND: Most trials regarding catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) describe a proportion of patients without blood pressure response. Recently, we were able to show arterial stiffness, measured by invasive pulse wave velocity (IPWV), seems to be an excellent predictor for blood pressure response. However, given the invasiveness, IPWV is less suitable as a selection criterion for patients undergoing RDN. Consequently, we aimed to investigate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) based measures of arterial stiffness in predicting the outcome of RDN compared to IPWV as reference. METHODS: Patients underwent CMR prior to RDN to assess ascending aortic distensibility (AAD), total arterial compliance (TAC), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). In a second step, central aortic blood pressure was estimated from ascending aortic area change and flow sequences and used to re-calculate total arterial compliance (cTAC). Additionally, IPWV was acquired. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (24 responders and 8 non-responders) were available for analysis. AAD, TAC and cTAC were higher in responders, IPWV was higher in non-responders. SVR was not different between the groups. Patients with AAD, cTAC or TAC above median and IPWV below median had significantly better BP response. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves predicting blood pressure response for IPWV, AAD, cTAC and TAC revealed areas under the curve of 0.849, 0.828, 0.776 and 0.753 (p = 0.004, 0.006, 0.021 and 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Beyond IPWV, AAD, cTAC and TAC appear as useful outcome predictors for RDN in patients with hypertension. CMR-derived markers of arterial stiffness might serve as non-invasive selection criteria for RDN.
BACKGROUND: Most trials regarding catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) describe a proportion of patients without blood pressure response. Recently, we were able to show arterial stiffness, measured by invasive pulse wave velocity (IPWV), seems to be an excellent predictor for blood pressure response. However, given the invasiveness, IPWV is less suitable as a selection criterion for patients undergoing RDN. Consequently, we aimed to investigate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) based measures of arterial stiffness in predicting the outcome of RDN compared to IPWV as reference. METHODS:Patients underwent CMR prior to RDN to assess ascending aortic distensibility (AAD), total arterial compliance (TAC), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). In a second step, central aortic blood pressure was estimated from ascending aortic area change and flow sequences and used to re-calculate total arterial compliance (cTAC). Additionally, IPWV was acquired. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (24 responders and 8 non-responders) were available for analysis. AAD, TAC and cTAC were higher in responders, IPWV was higher in non-responders. SVR was not different between the groups. Patients with AAD, cTAC or TAC above median and IPWV below median had significantly better BP response. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves predicting blood pressure response for IPWV, AAD, cTAC and TAC revealed areas under the curve of 0.849, 0.828, 0.776 and 0.753 (p = 0.004, 0.006, 0.021 and 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Beyond IPWV, AAD, cTAC and TAC appear as useful outcome predictors for RDN in patients with hypertension. CMR-derived markers of arterial stiffness might serve as non-invasive selection criteria for RDN.
Authors: Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm; Michel Azizi; Atul Pathak; Isabelle Durand Zaleski; Sebastian Ewen; Kostantinos Tsioufis; Bert Andersson; Peter J Blankestijn; Michel Burnier; Gilles Chatellier; Sameer Gafoor; Guido Grassi; Michael Joner; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Melvin D Lobo; Chaim Lotan; Gianfranco Parati; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Isabella Sudano; Christian Ukena; Evert van Leeuwen; Massimo Volpe; Stephan Windecker; Adam Witkowski; William Wijns; Thomas Zeller; Roland E Schmieder Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Michael A Quail; Jennifer A Steeden; Daniel Knight; Patrick Segers; Andrew M Taylor; Vivek Muthurangu Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Karl Fengler; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Robert Hoellriegel; Stephan Blazek; Christian Besler; Steffen Desch; Gerhard Schuler; Axel Linke; Philipp Lurz Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Mark Lipphardt; Michael J Koziolek; Luca-Yves Lehnig; Ann-Kathrin Schäfer; Gerhard A Müller; Stephan Lüders; Manuel Wallbach Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Karin Högerl; Susanne Jung; Peter Bramlage; Roland Veelken; Christian Ott Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Lukas Stoiber; Niky Ghorbani; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Nina Rank; Tomas Lapinskas; Christian Stehning; Burkert Pieske; Volkmar Falk; Rolf Gebker; Sebastian Kelle Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Alexandru Burlacu; Crischentian Brinza; Mariana Floria; Anca Elena Stefan; Andreea Covic; Adrian Covic Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 4.964