| Literature DB >> 29744413 |
Yashan Feng1, Shijie Zhu1, Liguo Wang1, Lei Chang1, Bingbing Yan1, Xiaozhe Song1, Shaokang Guan1.
Abstract
The poor corrosion resistance of biodegradable magnesium alloys is the dominant factor that limits their clinical application. In this study, to deal with this challenge, fluoride coating was prepared on Mg-Zn-Ca alloy as the inner coating and then hydroxyapatite (HA) coating as the outer coating was deposited on fluoride coating by pulse reverse current electrodeposition (PRC-HA/MgF2). As a comparative study, the microstructure and corrosion properties of the composite coating with the outer coating fabricated by traditional constant current electrodeposition (TED-HA/MgF2) were also investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the coatings show that the morphology of PRC-HA/MgF2 coating is dense and uniform, and presents nano-rod-like structure. Compared with that of TED-HA/MgF2, the corrosion current density of Mg alloy coated with PRC-HA/MgF2 coatings decreases from 5.72 × 10-5 A/cm2 to 4.32 × 10-7 A/cm2, and the corrosion resistance increases by almost two orders of magnitude. In immersion tests, samples coated with PRC-HA/MgF2 coating always show the lowest hydrogen evolution amount, and could induce deposition of the hexagonal structure-apatite on the surface rapidly. The results show that the corrosion resistance and the bioactivity of the coatings have been improved by adopting double-pulse current mode in the process of preparing HA on fluoride coating, and the PRC-HA/MgF2 coating is worth of further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Biomaterial; Fluoride coating; Hydroxyapatite; Magnesium alloy; Pulse reverse current electrodeposition
Year: 2017 PMID: 29744413 PMCID: PMC5935054 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1The morphology and characterization of the fluoride coating: (a) SEM image; (b) EDS result.
Fig. 2The SEM images of HA coating on fluoride coating prepared by different power source pattern: (a, c) TED; (b, d) PRC.
Fig. 3The EDS results of HA on fluoride coating prepared by different power source pattern: (a) TED; (b) PRC.
Fig. 4XRD patterns of different coatings: (a) fluoride coating, (b) TED-HA/MgF2 coating and (c) PRC-HA/MgF2 coating.
Fig. 5FTIR spectrum of different coatings: (a) TED-HA/MgF2 and (b) PRC-HA/MgF2 coating.
Fig. 6The cross-section image of (a) PRC-HA/MgF2 and (b) TED-HA/MgF2 composite coating on Mg-Zn-Ca alloy.
Fig. 7SEM images of the PRC-HA/MgF2 coating after deposition for (a) 5 min, (b) 10 min and (c) the Schematic drawing of coating growth.
Fig. 8Polarization curves (left) and hydrogen evolution test (right) of different coatings: (a) as-extruded Mg alloy, (b) TED-HA/MgF2 coating and (c) PRC-HA/MgF2 coating in SBF.
Values from the polarization curve of different samples in SBF.
| Samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Substrate | 3.23 × 10−4 | −1.68 | 1.11 × 102 |
| TED-HA/MgF2 coating | 5.81 × 10−5 | −1.60 | 7.36 × 102 |
| PRC-HA/MgF2 coating | 7.84 × 10−7 | −1.53 | 3.70 × 104 |
Fig. 9SEM photographs of (a) TED-HA/MgF2 coating and (b) PRC-HA/Mg coating immersed in SBF for 10 days.