Literature DB >> 29743691

Challenging local realism with human choices.

.   

Abstract

A Bell test is a randomized trial that compares experimental observations against the philosophical worldview of local realism 1 , in which the properties of the physical world are independent of our observation of them and no signal travels faster than light. A Bell test requires spatially distributed entanglement, fast and high-efficiency detection and unpredictable measurement settings2,3. Although technology can satisfy the first two of these requirements4-7, the use of physical devices to choose settings in a Bell test involves making assumptions about the physics that one aims to test. Bell himself noted this weakness in using physical setting choices and argued that human 'free will' could be used rigorously to ensure unpredictability in Bell tests 8 . Here we report a set of local-realism tests using human choices, which avoids assumptions about predictability in physics. We recruited about 100,000 human participants to play an online video game that incentivizes fast, sustained input of unpredictable selections and illustrates Bell-test methodology 9 . The participants generated 97,347,490 binary choices, which were directed via a scalable web platform to 12 laboratories on five continents, where 13 experiments tested local realism using photons5,6, single atoms 7 , atomic ensembles 10 and superconducting devices 11 . Over a 12-hour period on 30 November 2016, participants worldwide provided a sustained data flow of over 1,000 bits per second to the experiments, which used different human-generated data to choose each measurement setting. The observed correlations strongly contradict local realism and other realistic positions in bipartite and tripartite 12 scenarios. Project outcomes include closing the 'freedom-of-choice loophole' (the possibility that the setting choices are influenced by 'hidden variables' to correlate with the particle properties 13 ), the utilization of video-game methods 14 for rapid collection of human-generated randomness, and the use of networking techniques for global participation in experimental science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29743691     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0085-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  8 in total

Review 1.  The deep space quantum link: prospective fundamental physics experiments using long-baseline quantum optics.

Authors:  Makan Mohageg; Luca Mazzarella; Charis Anastopoulos; Jason Gallicchio; Bei-Lok Hu; Thomas Jennewein; Spencer Johnson; Shih-Yuin Lin; Alexander Ling; Christoph Marquardt; Matthias Meister; Raymond Newell; Albert Roura; Wolfgang P Schleich; Christian Schubert; Dmitry V Strekalov; Giuseppe Vallone; Paolo Villoresi; Lisa Wörner; Nan Yu; Aileen Zhai; Paul Kwiat
Journal:  EPJ Quantum Technol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 7.000

2.  Remote optimization of an ultracold atoms experiment by experts and citizen scientists.

Authors:  Robert Heck; Oana Vuculescu; Jens Jakob Sørensen; Jonathan Zoller; Morten G Andreasen; Mark G Bason; Poul Ejlertsen; Ottó Elíasson; Pinja Haikka; Jens S Laustsen; Lærke L Nielsen; Andrew Mao; Romain Müller; Mario Napolitano; Mads K Pedersen; Aske R Thorsen; Carsten Bergenholtz; Tommaso Calarco; Simone Montangero; Jacob F Sherson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Generating randomness: making the most out of disordering a false order into a real one.

Authors:  Yaron Ilan
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Entropy Balance in the Expanding Universe: A Novel Perspective.

Authors:  Arturo Tozzi; James F Peters
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 5.  Classical (Local and Contextual) Probability Model for Bohm-Bell Type Experiments: No-Signaling as Independence of Random Variables.

Authors:  Andrei Khrennikov; Alexander Alodjants
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Simulation of the Bell inequality violation based on quantum steering concept.

Authors:  Mohsen Ruzbehani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Why Should Natural Principles Be Simple?

Authors:  Arturo Tozzi
Journal:  Philosophia (Ramat Gan)       Date:  2021-04-16

8.  Quantifying and Interpreting Connection Strength in Macro- and Microscopic Systems: Lessons from Bell's Approach.

Authors:  Christoph Gallus; Pawel Blasiak; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.524

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.