Interleukin-1β expression is increased in the duodenum of dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease.

The exact pathogenesis of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in humans as well as dogs remains largely unknown, although it is believed to represent a multifactorial immune-mediated disease, resulting from complex interplay between the mucosal immune system and the intestinal microbiome in genetically susceptible individuals.1 Many studies have attempted to identify inflammatory mediators in the mucosa of affected dogs, with no predominant cytokine pattern emerging.2 3 In human IBD, as well as mouse models of human IBD, activation of the inflammasome pathway with secretion of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 has been shown to play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease.4 5 In canine IBD, two previous studies have shown that IL-1β may be elevated in the intestinal mucosa of affected dogs.6–8 The purpose of the current study was to investigate duodenal levels of IL-1β protein in a larger population of dogs having varying clinical severity of IBD, and to correlate IL-1β expression profiles with a clinical scoring index (Canine Chronic Enteropathy Clinical Activity Index, CCECAI).9

Duodenal biopsies from 10 dogs each with mild IBD (CCECAI 0–5), moderate IBD (CCECAI 6–8), severe IBD (CCECAI ≥9), but no clinical signs of protein-losing enteropathy (PLE), and with serum albumin concentrations within the reference range, and dogs with PLE with clinical signs such as ascites or peripheral oedema, as well as 10 healthy control beagle dogs were included in the study. The diagnosis of IBD was confirmed in all dogs based on exclusion of any other causes for chronic diarrhoea,10 including a food trial and histopathologic findings of intestinal mucosal biopsies confirming lymphoplasmacytic, eosinophilic or mixed inflammation. In addition, at the time of IBD diagnosis, all dogs had a clinical scoring index (CCECAI) recorded by the attending clinician. The diagnosis of PLE was made if all of the following applied: (1) history of chronic gastrointestinal disease (including weight loss, vomiting, diarrhoea, decreased appetite), clinical signs of ascites and/or peripheral oedema, and diagnosis of IBD as above; (2) panhypoproteinaemia (serum albumin less than 2.8 g/dl and serum globulin less than 2.1 g/dl; reference ranges 2.8–3.9 and 2.1–4.1 g/dl, respectively); (3) exclusion of hepatic dysfunction by serum bile acid stimulation test; and (4) absence of proteinuria by urinalysis. Proteinuria was excluded in all dogs on the basis of a negative urine dipstick or a urine protein:creatinine ratio of less than 0.5 (reference range: less than 0.5). The healthy control dogs had been euthanased for an unrelated study and had duodenal endoscopic biopsies collected before terminal euthanasia. All healthy control dogs had normal duodenal histopathology findings.

Duodenal endoscopic biopsies were acquired at the time of diagnosis, and one additional biopsy was fresh frozen in a plain tube and stored at −80°C until batch analysis. Histopathology was performed in all dogs and was consistent with idiopathic IBD in all cases. In addition, in the PLE group, all cases showed histopathologically significant lacteal dilation. The dogs in the group of severe IBD but with no clinical signs of PLE showed histopathological infiltration with lymphocytes and plasma cells, as well as significant villus blunting; however, lacteal dilation or crypt abscesses were not observed in any of these cases. IL-1β protein expression in duodenal biopsies was measured according to a modified protocol that has been previously published.6 Briefly, biopsy samples were weighed prior to manipulation and equal weighted specimens were subsequently homogenised at 20 Hz for two minutes in 500 µl homogenisation buffer (PBS containing 0.05 per cent Tween-20) with a protease inhibitor cocktail. Tissue homogenates were centrifuged at 400 g for two minutes and the supernatants frozen at −80°C until quantitative analysis. Quantification of IL-1β protein expression was determined using a commercially available canine-specific IL-1β ELISA following the manufacturer’s assay instructions. The assay has a lower detection limit of 0.1 pg/ml and intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation are less than or equal to 2.4 per cent and less than or equal to 11.8 per cent, respectively.

All samples were analysed in duplicate and values were expressed as mean protein concentration (pg/ml/mg tissue). Statistical analyses were performed using a Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison of IL-1β expression between disease groups, followed by a Dunn’s post hoc test. The relationships between IL-1β expression and CCECAI score was analysed using a Spearman rank correlation test.

Median IL-1β expression (range) for the total patient group (all IBD groups plus PLE group) was 18.8 (8.0–219.4) pg/ml/mg tissue. Median and range of IL-1β expression for the individual patient groups is summarised in Table 1.

TABLE 1:

Summary of median (range) IL-1β protein expression (pg/ml/mg tissue)

Severe IBD	Moderate IBD	Mild IBD	PLE	Healthy controls
121.6 (38.3–219.4)	19.7 (10.9–24.8)	13.3 (8.0–29.8)	13.0 (8.0–27.9)	0.9 (0.3–1.4)

IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IL, interleukin; PLE, protein-losing enteropathy.

There was a statistically significant difference in IL-1β expression between all IBD dogs and the healthy controls (P<0.0001), with a 20-fold increase in IL-1β concentrations between the combined severity IBD group (mild, moderate or severe IBD) versus healthy control dogs (Fig 1). In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between the PLE and the severe IBD group (P<0.01), between the severe and moderate IBD group (P<0.001), and between the severe and mild IBD group (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the moderate and mild IBD groups and the PLE and the healthy control groups (P=0.7). There was a moderate positive correlation between IL-1β protein expression and severity of disease as measured by CCECAI scores (r2=0.53, P<0.0001) (Fig 2).

FIG 1:

Box and whisker plots of interleukin (IL)-1β expression in the different groups of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and in healthy dogs. The plots show median (line within box), 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and minimum and maximum values (whiskers). There was a statistically significant difference in IL-1β expression between all IBD dogs and the healthy controls (P<0.0001). Mucosal IL-1β was increased 20-fold in the combined severity IBD group (mild, moderate or severe IBD) versus control dogs. PLE, protein-losing enteropathy.

FIG 2:

Spearman rank correlation between interleukin (IL)-1β expression in all groups of dogs with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and clinical disease activity score as measured by Canine Chronic Enteropathy Clinical Activity Index (CCECAI).9

Similar to what has been shown in human IBD, the data in this current study confirm previous reports of IL-1β protein expression being increased in the intestinal mucosa of dogs diagnosed with IBD.6–8 Interestingly, the highest expression levels were found in intestinal mucosa of dogs with severe IBD with serum albumin concentrations within the reference range, and not in dogs with PLE. This may point to a different pathogenesis between the clinical syndromes of severe IBD and PLE. However, it is also possible that there was an effect of the diet, treatments or supplements that was not taken into account. The number of cells producing IL-1β was not standardised because of the method used to detect IL-1β, which will have an effect on the amount of IL-1β measured per mg tissue. A further potential limitation of this study is that the group of dogs with severe IBD but without clinical signs of PLE and the PLE group may have overlapped, as faecal alpha1-protease inhibitor was not measured and would represent a more sensitive method for detection of PLE than hypoalbuminaemia.11 In addition, correlation of IL-1β concentrations with the severity of histological score was not performed and would have added additional information. Whole crushed biopsies were used for the measurement of IL-1β, which may falsely increase the amount of IL-1β in the supernatant. Furthermore, the cellular source of the IL-1β production cannot be determined with this method.