| Literature DB >> 29743072 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not circuit training at home affects the calcaneus quantitative ultrasound status as well as other indices of body composition among undergraduate female students.Entities:
Keywords: Body composition; Calcaneus QUS status; Circuit training; Ultrasound bone densitometer; Undergraduate female students
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29743072 PMCID: PMC5944040 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0743-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Characteristics of total subjects, n = 41
| Factors | Means ± SD (range) | t-scoreb | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 18.5 ± 0.6 (18–20) | ||
| Height (cm) | 157.7 ± 5.2 (145.6–167.4) | ||
| Secondary sexual characteristic development (age in years)a | 12.1 ± 1.4 (9.0–16.0) | ||
| Measurement at the baseline | Calcaneus QUS-SI (Stiffness index) | 104.7 ± 16.2 (75.0–151.0) | |
| Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | 217.7 ± 54.6 (91.0–255.0) | ||
| Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | 33.1 ± 2.6 (31.0–41.0) | ||
| Weight (kg) | 51.2 ± 7.0 (38.9–73.5) | ||
| Body Fat Percentage (%) | 27.7 ± 4.6 (17.4–39.3) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.6 ± 2.5 (15.0–28.6) | ||
| Muscle mass (kg) | 34.7 ± 3.1 (28.3–43.0) | ||
| Measurement after 2 months | Calcaneus QUS-SI (Stiffness index) | 109.5 ± 18.2 (74.0–163.0) | 1.075 |
| Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | 212.4 ± 53.3 (93.0–255.0) | 0.658 | |
| Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | 32.1 ± 0.6 (29.0–33.0) | 1.877 | |
| Weight (kg) | 51.4 ± 7.0 (40.4–73.3) | 0.117 | |
| Body Fat Percentage (%) | 28.1 ± 4.6 (19.7–39.1) | 0.427 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.7 ± 2.4 (15.6–28.5) | 0.200 | |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 34.7 ± 3.0 (28.0–42.9) | 0.530 | |
| Measurement after 3 months | Calcaneus QUS-SI (Stiffness index) | 108.6 ± 16.7 (74.0–166.0) | 1.264 |
| Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | 221.1 ± 51.8 (80.0–255.0) | 0.839 | |
| Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | 32.4 ± 0.7 (31.0–34.0) | 2.644 † | |
| Weight (kg) | 51.2 ± 7.1 (40.0–74.2) | 0.038 | |
| Body Fat Percentage (%) | 28.5 ± 4.7 (18.7–40.1) | 0.760 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.6 ± 2.5 (15.4–28.9) | 0.013 | |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 34.3 ± 2.9 (28.3–42.0) | 0.633 |
2D:4D ratio of the finger length of the 2nd and 4th digit, QUS-SI stiffness index by quantitative ultrasound, QUS-SOS speed of sound by quantitative ultrasound, QUS-BUA broadband ultrasound attenuation by quantitative ultrasound, BMI body mass index
aThe age at which menstruation started
bt-score by an unpaired t-test (two-sided test) showed the differences between the baseline and either 2 or 3 months after baseline
[†] indicates a significant relationship between the baseline and the time of follow-up; † < 0.05
The differences in the body frame index at the baseline between the exercising and non-exercising groups by an unpaired t-test (two-sided test)
| Factors | Subjects |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exercising group*1 ( | Non-exercising group*2 ( | ||
| Weight (kg) | 50.13 ± 7.05 | 52.52 ± 6.89 | 0.280 |
| Body Fat Percentage (%) | 27.30 ± 4.70 | 28.13 ± 4.65 | 0.576 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.24 ± 2.44 | 21.01 ± 2.46 | 0.319 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 33.87 ± 2.95 | 34.86 ± 2.94 | 0.292 |
| Calcaneus QUS-SI | 105.50 ± 15.23 | 103.79 ± 17.61 | 0.740 |
| Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | 214.05 ± 61.51 | 225.11 ± 45.97 | 0.524 |
| Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | 33.36 ± 3.00 | 32.95 ± 2.04 | 0.612 |
BMI body mass index, QUS-SI stiffness index by quantitative ultrasound, QUS-SOS speed of sound by quantitative ultrasound, QUS-BUA broadband ultrasound attenuation by quantitative ultrasound
*1: Subjects performed the circuit training at home at least 3 times a week for the first 2 months
*2: Subjects did not perform the circuit training
The differences in the body frame index at two and three months later between the exercising and non-exercising groups by a paired t-test (two-sided test)
| Baseline | 2 months later | 3 months later | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | t score | M | SD | t score | |||
| Exercising group, | ||||||||||
| Weight (kg) | 50.1 | 7.05 | 50.2 | 7.11 | 0.11 | 0.91 | 50.1 | 7.12 | 0.15 | 0.89 |
| Body Fat Percentage (%) | 27.3 | 4.70 | 27.4 | 4.75 | 0.25 | 0.80 | 27.9 | 4.86 | 2.06 | 0.53 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.2 | 2.44 | 20.3 | 2.40 | 0.11 | 0.91 | 20.2 | 2.47 | 0.16 | 0.88 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 33.9 | 2.95 | 34.2 | 2.96 | 2.59 |
| 34.2 | 2.95 | 2.36 |
|
| Calcaneus QUS-SI | 105.5 | 15.2 | 108.9 | 17.5 | 1.36 | 0.19 | 110.8 | 18.2 | 2.07 | 0.05 |
| Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | 206.0 | 60.6 | 214.1 | 61.5 | 0.93 | 0.37 | 231.1 | 45.0 | 2.56 |
|
| Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | 32.0 | 0.8 | 33.4 | 3.0 | 2.28 |
| 32.4 | 0.7 | 2.25 |
|
| Non-exercising group, | ||||||||||
| Weight (kg) | 52.5 | 6.89 | 52.9 | 6.84 | 1.66 | 0.11 | 52.4 | 6.98 | 0.35 | 0.73 |
| Body Fat Percentage (%) | 28.1 | 4.65 | 29.0 | 4.30 | 2.52 |
| 29.1 | 4.61 | 3.36 |
|
| BMI*1 (kg/m2) | 21.0 | 2.46 | 21.2 | 2.37 | 2.66 |
| 21.0 | 2.47 | 0.32 | 0.75 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 35.4 | 3.13 | 35.3 | 3.04 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 34.9 | 2.94 | 3.38 |
|
| Calcaneus QUS-SI | 103.8 | 17.6 | 108.0 | 18.6 | 3.66 |
| 108.3 | 16.2 | 3.54 |
|
| Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | 209.5 | 57.8 | 217.5 | 44.8 | 1.09 | 0.292 | 225.1 | 46.0 | 1.99 | 0.062 |
| Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | 32.2 | 0.50 | 33.0 | 2.04 | 1.76 | 0.096 | 32.4 | 0.68 | 1.48 | 0.157 |
BMI body mass index, QUS-SI stiffness index by quantitative ultrasound, QUS-SOS speed of sound by quantitative ultrasound, QUS-BUA broadband ultrasound attenuation by quantitative ultrasound
Exercising group, n = 22
Non-exercising group, n = 19
The numerical value in italicized face indicates a significantly higher than the value at baseline
The effect of muscle mass or body fat percentage on calcaneus QUS status in both exercising group and non-exercising group by a multiple regression analysis
| Exercising group, | ||||
| Factors | β | |||
| Model I | Calcaneus QUS-SI | Body Fat Percentage (%) | -0.129 | 0.768 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 0.303 | 0.061 | ||
| Model II | Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | Body Fat Percentage (%) | - 0.126 | 0.627 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 0.902 |
| ||
| Model III | Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | Body Fat Percentage (%) | - 0.577 |
|
| Muscle mass (kg) | 0.477 | 0.054 | ||
| Model I: Adjusted R2=0.21 ( | ||||
| Non-exercising group, | ||||
| Factors | β | |||
| Model I | Calcaneus QUS-SI | Body Fat Percentage (%) | 0.847 |
|
| Muscle mass (kg) | 0.110 | 0.700 | ||
| Model II | Calcaneus QUS-SOS (m/s) | Body Fat Percentage (%) | 0.759 | 0.051 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 0.360 | 0.071 | ||
| Model III | Calcaneus QUS-BUA (dB/MHz) | Body Fat Percentage (%) | 0.639 | 0.060 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | - 0.399 | 0.089 | ||
| Model I: Adjusted R2=0.22 ( | ||||
QUS-SI, stiffness index by quantitative ultrasound; QUS-SOS, speed of sound by quantitative ultrasound
QUS-BUA, broadband ultrasound attenuation by quantitative ultrasound
The numerical value in italicized face indicates a significant correlative factor of each calcaneus QUS status