Ming Li1,2,3, Qingbao Guan4, Theo J Dingemans2,5. 1. National Engineering Research Center for Biotechnology , Nanjing Tech University , Nanjing 211800 , China. 2. Faculty of Aerospace Engineering , Delft University of Technology , Kluyverweg 1 , 2629 HS Delft , The Netherlands. 3. Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI), P.O. Box 902, 5600 AX Eindhoven , The Netherlands. 4. Department of Material Science and Engineering , Soochow University , Suzhou 215123 , China. 5. Department of Applied Physical Sciences , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , 1113 Murray Hall , Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27599-3050 , United States.
Abstract
We have explored semicrystalline poly(decamethylene terephthalamide) (PA 10T) based thermosets as single-component high-temperature (>200 °C) shape memory polymers (SMPs). The PA 10T thermosets were prepared from reactive thermoplastic precursors. Reactive phenylethynyl (PE) functionalities were either attached at the chain termini or placed as side groups along the polymer main chain. The shape fixation and recovery performance of the thermoset films were investigated using a rheometer in torsion mode. By controlling the Mn of the reactive oligomers, or the PE concentration of the PE side-group functionalized copolyamides, we were able to design dual-shape memory PA 10T thermosets with a broad recovery temperature range of 227-285 °C. The thermosets based on the 1000 g mol-1 reactive PE precursor and the copolyamide with 15 mol % PE side groups show the highest fixation rate (99%) and recovery rate (≥90%). High temperature triple-shape memory behavior can be achieved as well when we use the melt transition ( Tm ≥ 200 °C) and the glass transition ( Tg = ∼125 °C) as the two switches. The recovery rate of the two recovery steps are highly dependent on the crystallinity of the thermosets and vary within a wide range of 74%-139% and 40-82% for the two steps, respectively. Reversible shape memory events could also be demonstrated when we perform a forward and backward deformation in a triple shape memory cycle. We also studied the angular recovery velocity as a function of temperature, which provides a thermokinematic picture of the shape recovery process and helps to program for desired shape memory behavior.
We have explored semicrystalline poly(decamethylene terephthalamide) (PA 10T) based thermosets as single-component high-temperature (>200 °C) shape memory polymers (SMPs). The PA 10T thermosets were prepared from reactive thermoplastic precursors. Reactive phenylethynyl (PE) functionalities were either attached at the chain termini or placed as side groups along the polymer main chain. The shape fixation and recovery performance of the thermoset films were investigated using a rheometer in torsion mode. By controlling the Mn of the reactive oligomers, or the PE concentration of the PE side-group functionalized copolyamides, we were able to design dual-shape memory PA 10T thermosets with a broad recovery temperature range of 227-285 °C. The thermosets based on the 1000 g mol-1 reactive PE precursor and the copolyamide with 15 mol % PE side groups show the highest fixation rate (99%) and recovery rate (≥90%). High temperature triple-shape memory behavior can be achieved as well when we use the melt transition ( Tm ≥ 200 °C) and the glass transition ( Tg = ∼125 °C) as the two switches. The recovery rate of the two recovery steps are highly dependent on the crystallinity of the thermosets and vary within a wide range of 74%-139% and 40-82% for the two steps, respectively. Reversible shape memory events could also be demonstrated when we perform a forward and backward deformation in a triple shape memory cycle. We also studied the angular recovery velocity as a function of temperature, which provides a thermokinematic picture of the shape recovery process and helps to program for desired shape memory behavior.
Interest in shape memory
polymers (SMPs) has grown rapidly since the 1980s.[1−5] Typical applications are heat-shrink tubing, temperature
sensors and actuators, biomedical and surgical materials, and aerospace
devices.[6,7] Thermoresponsive SMPs are the most investigated
systems that polymers are able to adopt a temporary shape upon deformation
and to revert back to the permanent shape upon exposure to heat.[7,8] They are generally composed of a polymer network to maintain the
permanent shape and a reversible switch responsible for the shape
fixation and recovery.[8−11] The glass transition temperature (Tg) and melting temperature (Tm) are the
two most important thermal transitions for thermoresponsive SMPs.
Polyurethanes, polyesters, and (methyl)acrylate-based polymer networks
have been investigated as SMPs based on the glass transition. Cross-linked
semicrystalline networks or (multi)block copolymer systems have been
developed to design Tm-based SMPs, such
as polyolefins, polyethers, and polyesters.[6] However, most SMPs exhibit a switching temperature lower than 100
°C, which may not meet the requirements for high temperature
aerospace, automotive, or electronic applications.Recently,
several examples of high-temperature (>200 °C) SMPs have been
reported.[12−21] Vaia and co-workers synthesized an amorphous fluorinated polyimide
with a shape recovery temperature of 220 °C.[20] This was the first example of a single-component high-temperature
SMP. However, this fluorinated polyimide can only be obtained as thin
films, which excludes the possibility to produce complex shapes using
melt processing methods. Weiss et al. have introduced ionic moieties
into poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) leading to a Tg-based SMP with a switching temperature close to 200
°C, where the exact switching temperature depends on the metal
counterions used.[14] In a later publication,
this system was further developed into a Tm-based SMP by incorporation of sodium oleate, which displays a higher
switching temperature of 230–240 °C due to the melting
of sodium oleate.[15]In contrast to
the dual SMPs mentioned above, triple SMPs featuring two independent
temporary shapes were first reported by Lendlein’s group.[22] They require two programming steps and show
two recovery steps. Triple-shape memory effects can be realized in
a polymer material possessing two distinct thermal transitions[15,22−24] or one single broad transition such as a broad glass
transition.[16,25] High temperature triple SMPs
based on a single-component thermotropic liquid crystalline poly(esterimide)
thermosets have recently been reported by Guan et al. The polymer
shows two glass transition temperatures at ∼120 and ∼200
°C, both of which can be used as switches for triple SMPs.[21]In previous publications we reported on
the synthesis and (thermo)mechanical properties of semiaromaticpolyamide
thermosets based on poly(decamethylene terephthalamide) (PA 10T).[26,27] We showed that this class of polymers can be processed into semicrystalline
thermoset films where the degree of crystallinity can be controlled.
The melting/crystallization of the crystalline phase and the covalent
network can be used as the high-temperature switch and permanent scaffold,
respectively, for a dual shape memory effect (SME). More sophisticated
triple and one-way reversible SME can be designed with the glass transition
as the second switch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
demonstration of a high-temperature SMP based on a single-component
semicrystalline polyamide thermoset.
Experimental Section
Materials
The syntheses of phenylethynyl (PE) end-capped PA 10T oligomers
(Scheme A) and PE
side-group-functionalized copolyamides (Scheme B) have been described in detail elsewhere.[26,27] In order to obtain a covalently cross-linked polyamide network,
the reactive precursors were thermally cured. A standard melt compression
technique was used to prepare the thermoset films according to the
following procedure: The precursor polymers were ground into a fine
powder using a mortar and pestle. The powder was placed between two
metal plates lined with Kapton film, and this stack was consolidated
in a Joos hot-press using a predetermined temperature program and
a 5 kN force. The temperature program was set to heat to 350 °C
at 5 °C min–1, hold for 15 min, and cooled
to 50 °C at 20 °C min–1. The obtained
cured films were used for further characterization.
Scheme 1
Structures of Precursors
via (A) Reactive End-Group Approach and (B) Reactive Side-Group Approach
The film samples prepared from
PA 10T reactive oligomers (Mn of 1000
and 3000 g mol–1) are denoted as PE-1K and PE-3K.
TPE-5, TPE-10, and TPE-15 represent the film samples prepared from
reactive TPE-copolyamides with 5, 10, and 15 mol % of reactive TPE
comonomer, respectively. A PA 10T thermoplastic sample (Mn = 7500 g mol–1) was used as the reference
in this paper and denoted as Ref. The 1H NMR spectra of
the synthesized precursors (Supporting Information, Figure S1) confirms that the concentration of reactive functionalities,
either as end-caps or as side groups, is consistent with the feed
ratio of the monomers.
Characterization
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz Bruker WM-400
at 25 °C using trifluoroacetic acid-d as solvent.
DSC was conducted on a PerkinElmer Sapphire DSC under a nitrogen atmosphere
at a heating/cooling rate of 20 °C min–1. DMTA
was performed on a PerkinElmer Diamond DMTA with film samples (0.2–0.3
mm thick) at a heating rate of 2 °C min–1 under
a nitrogen atmosphere. Data were collected at a frequency of 1 Hz.The SME was characterized in a cyclic torsion mode as illustrated
in Figure . Compared
to the traditional extension or bending tests,[28] torsion tests involve nonhomogeneous strains and stresses
in the cross section of a rectangular bar and enable the SMPs to reach
large deformations with moderate strains, which are believed to be
more representative of practical applications of SMPs.[29−32]
Figure 1
Illustration
of a shape deformation, fixation, and recovery cycle of the dual SME
in torsion mode.
Illustration
of a shape deformation, fixation, and recovery cycle of the dual SME
in torsion mode.The shape programming
and recovery cycles were performed using a Thermofisher Haake MARS
III rheometer equipped with a solid clamp geometry under a N2 atmosphere. Rectangular thin films with a width of ∼2.5 mm
and thickness of ∼0.25 mm were loaded into the setup with a
length of 15 mm between the clamps. The samples were deformed in a
torsion mode at a constant strain rate of 0.1% s–1 equivalent to a rotation speed of 3.4° s–1.The procedure of one cycle for a dual SME test includes the
following steps: (1) heat the sample to the programming temperature
(Tprog); (2) rotate the sample to the
predetermined angle (ϕd); (3) keep the angle constant,
cool to the fixation temperature (Tf)
at 10 °C min–1 and stabilize for 10 min; (4)
remove the stress; (5) heat the sample to Tprog at 10 °C min–1 in a stress-free condition
followed by an isothermal hold at Tprog for 10 min to stabilize. This cycle was repeated multiple times
to characterize the reproducibility of the shape memory performance.
The rotation angle of the sample was monitored and recorded during
the whole test. For triple SME measurements, the sample was consecutively
deformed in two steps in one programming cycle. Two different Tprogs were used, one being above Tm and the other between Tg and Tm.
Results
and Discussion
Melting and Thermomechanical
Properties
In general, either the Tg or the Tm transition of a polymer
can be applied to trigger a dual-shape memory event; however, to achieve
high-temperature triple-shape memory behavior in a single-component
polymer is challenging, as two high-temperature temporary networks
with distinct rubbery plateaus are required.[15,22−24] One solution to realize this type of structure is
to introduce moderate cross-links into a high-Tg semicrystalline polymer. In our previous work, we have explored
a semiaromaticpolyamide, PA 10T (Tg =
∼125 °C, Tm = ∼315
°C), as the base polymer to prepare semicrystalline polyamide
thermosets. Phenylethynyl (PE) shows high cure-temperature of 330–370
°C and thus is able to provide a proper processing window for
the PA 10T-based precursors. Therefore, we have synthesized a reactive
PE-based end-cap and a reactive PE-based comonomer, which were copolymerized
with terephthalic acid and 1,10-diaminodecane to yield curable PE
end-capped oligomers and PE side-group functionalized copolymers.
The polyamide thermosets were obtained after a subsequent thermal
cure at a temperature of 350 °C for 15 min. PE-1K and PE-3K refer
to the cured end-capped oligomers with Mn = 1000 and 3000 g mol–1, respectively. TPE-5,
TPE-10, and TPE-15 represent the cured side-group functionalized copolyamides
with 5, 10, and 15 mol % PE side groups, respectively.The melting
curves and properties of a thermoplastic PA 10T reference polymer
(Ref) and the resultant polyamide thermosets are shown in Figure and Table . The thermoset samples after
cure are semicrystalline showing a Tm of
227–288 °C and ΔHm of
8–33 J g–1. These values are much lower than
the Tm and the ΔHm of the reference polymer (Ref) (318 °C and 82 J
g–1), which means the crystallizability of the polymer
chains in the thermosets is strongly suppressed.
Figure 2
DSC heating scans (first
heat) of (A) reference polymer (Ref), PE-3K, and PE-1K and (B) reference
polymer (Ref), TPE-5, TPE-10, and TPE-15. The asterisk refers to melting
peaks (N2 atmosphere and heating rate of 20 °C min–1).
Table 1
Thermal
Properties of the Thermoplastic Reference Polymer (Ref) and the Cured
Thermoset Samples
sample
Tma (°C)
ΔHm (J g–1)
Tgb (°C)
cross-linking
densityc (kmol m–3)
Ref
318
82
127
PE-3K
283
33
127
0.68
PE-1K
244
8
129
0.72
TPE-5
285
33
123
0.94
TPE-10
250
27
123
1.79
TPE-15
227
20
125
2.34
Tm refers to the max of the melting
peak as observed in DSC experiments.
Tg refers to the max of E″ as observed in DMTA experiments.
Cross-linking density (υ) was
calculated using , where E′
is the storage modulus of cured films at 350 °C (T = 623 K) and R the universal gas constant (8.314
J K–1 mol–1).
DSC heating scans (first
heat) of (A) reference polymer (Ref), PE-3K, and PE-1K and (B) reference
polymer (Ref), TPE-5, TPE-10, and TPE-15. The asterisk refers to melting
peaks (N2 atmosphere and heating rate of 20 °C min–1).Tm refers to the max of the melting
peak as observed in DSC experiments.Tg refers to the max of E″ as observed in DMTA experiments.Cross-linking density (υ) was
calculated using , where E′
is the storage modulus of cured films at 350 °C (T = 623 K) and R the universal gas constant (8.314
J K–1 mol–1).Figure shows the thermomechanical behavior of the
reference polymer (Ref) and the thermosets. The Ref film exhibits
a Tg at 127 °C, but this film fails
at 297 °C because it has reached the melting point (Tm). In contrast to the reference polymer (Ref), the thermoset
samples show two plateau regions (Tg – Tm and >Tm) in
the DMTA profiles. The second plateau of the thermosets is stable
up to ∼400 °C, which confirms the presence of a network
structure. The Tgs of both thermoset samples
remain virtually unchanged (123–129 °C) when compared
to that of the reference polymer (Ref).
Figure 3
DMTA of (A) reference
polymer (Ref), PE-1K, and PE-3K films and (B) reference polymer (Ref),
TPE-5, TPE-10, and TPE-15 films. Heating rate 2 °C min–1 under N2 atmosphere and a frequency of 1 Hz. The insets
show E″ at the glass transition temperature.
DMTA of (A) reference
polymer (Ref), PE-1K, and PE-3K films and (B) reference polymer (Ref),
TPE-5, TPE-10, and TPE-15 films. Heating rate 2 °C min–1 under N2 atmosphere and a frequency of 1 Hz. The insets
show E″ at the glass transition temperature.The molecular structure of the
resultant semicrystalline thermosets is depicted in Figure . PE groups combine at the
cure temperature resulting in cross-links with multiple after-cure
chemical structures depending on cure temperature, time, and PE concentration.
We attempted to investigate the cure chemistry using Raman and FTIR
spectroscopy.[33,34] However, Raman spectroscopy failed
due to a strong fluorescence background, and FTIR cannot detect the
acetylene bond of PE because of IR insensitivity. Hence, direct evidence
is not available to confirm the chemical change of the PE functionalities.
The pan class="Chemical">DMTA results of the cured samples show a rubbery plateau above Tm, and this plateau is stable up to ∼400
°C, which confirms that cross-linking has taken place during
cure. The two-plateau thermal behavior enables triple-shape memory
properties by taking both Tg and Tm transitions as the switches. The Tm transition can be solely used as a switch to design
a high-temperature (>200 °C) dual-shape memory polymer.
Figure 4
Molecular representation
of the semicrystalline PA 10T thermosets. Crystalline polymer (dark
blue) is embedded in an amorphous matrix (light blue), and the red
dots represent covalent cross-link points.
Molecular representation
of the semicrystalline PA 10T thermosets. Crystalline polymer (dark
blue) is embedded in an amorphous matrix (light blue), and the red
dots represent covalent cross-link points.
Dual-Shape Memory Behavior
Because
of the semicrystalline nature of the synthesized polyamide thermosets,
their melting and crystallization processes can be used as the thermoresponsive
switch for dual-shape memory behavior. Three consecutive deformation,
fixation, and recovery cycles in a torsion mode were conducted for
each sample to test the shape memory performance over multiple cycles.Shape fixation rate (Rf) and shape
recovery rate (Rr) are the most important
parameters to characterize the shape memory performance.[35]Rf describes how
accurately the temporary shape can be fixed, and Rr quantifies the ability of the polymer to memorize its
permanent shape. When performing the measurements in torsion mode, Rf and Rr can be
calculated using eqs and 2.where φd, φf, and φr denote the
rotational angle after deformation, at the fixed temporary shape at Tf, and after recovery, respectively. The instantaneous
recovery velocity Vr can be calculated
as the time derivative of the angle as shown in eq .Plotting Vr against temperature reveals
the temperature range corresponding to the shape recovery process.[21] This provides a clear thermokinematic view of
the shape recovery and helps to program for desired SME.The thermoplastic reference film (ref) cannot be deformed
above the melting temperature because of the absence of a rubbery
plateau, thus the glass transition was used as the switch for the
SME. As shown in Figure A, the sample was deformed at 220 °C, which lies between Tg (127 °C) and Tm (318 °C), and the shape was fixed at 100 °C where the
sample is in a glassy state. Therefore, the crystalline domains act
as the scaffold, and the deformation of the polymer takes place in
the amorphous state.
Figure 5
Three consecutive
dual-shape memory cycles for (A) reference polymer (Ref), (B) PE-3K,
and (C) PE-1K. Shape recovery velocity as a function of temperature
in the second cycle for (D) reference polymer (Ref), (E) PE-3K, and
(F) PE-1K. Cooling/heating rate 10 °C min–1 and N2 atmosphere.
Three consecutive
dual-shape memory cycles for (A) reference polymer (Ref), (B) PE-3K,
and (C) PE-1K. Shape recovery velocity as a function of temperature
in the second cycle for (D) reference polymer (Ref), (E) PE-3K, and
(F) PE-1K. Cooling/heating rate 10 °C min–1 and N2 atmosphere.In contrast to the reference polymer (Ref),
PE-3K and PE-1K thermoset films are stable up to ∼400 °C
in DMTA experiments and exhibit two plateau regions (Tg – Tm and >Tm), as shown in Figure . This allows for deforming the film samples
in the second plateau region (>Tm). Figures B and 5C show that PE-3K and PE-1K were deformed at 315 and 275 °C,
respectively, which is about 30 °C higher than their Tms (283 and 244 °C). At this temperature
the covalent network acts as the scaffold, and the temporary shape
is fixed by crystallization and vitrification at the fixation step.
At the recovery step, the angle shows a slight decrease when the sample
passes through the glass transition, which is associated with the
release of the stress trapped in the mobile amorphous region. A subsequent
slow increase in the angle is observed, which can be explained by
thermal expansion.[36] When the sample starts
melting, the angle recovers rapidly due to the fast release of the
trapped stress.The shape-memory performance of the first few
cycles is usually not representative, as can be seen in Figure B,C. This is generally attributed
to residual strain from the processing history of the sample.[13,35]Table shows the
fixation and recovery results of the first three cycles of the reference
thermoplastic polymer (Ref), the PE-3K, and PE-1K thermoset films.
The PE-3K film shows a very low Rr of
36% in the first cycle compared to the following cycles (Rr = 72% and 76%), whereas the Rr of the PE-1K film shows a medium change over cycles (Rr = 81%, 90%, and 88%). Such significant difference can
originate from the different cross-linking densities of these two
samples. PE-3K has a lower cross-linking density and therefore longer
pan class="Chemical">polymer chains between cross-links, which is more likely to store
residual strain. The recovery of both samples cannot reach 100% because
the irreversible chain-segment orientation and the relaxation effect
in the polymer network partly dissipate the stored entropy.[20]
Table 2
Dual-Shape Fixation
and Recovery Results of the Reference Thermoplastic Polymer (Ref),
PE-3K, and PE-1K Thermoset Films
cycle 1
cycle 2
cycle 3
sample
Tproga (°C)
Trb (°C)
Rf (%)
Rr (%)
Rf (%)
Rr (%)
Rf (%)
Rr (%)
Ref
220
210
89
86
89
82
89
84
PE-3K
315
285
93
36
94
72
94
76
PE-1K
275
144, 240
99
81
98
90
95
88
Tprog refers to the programming temperature.
Tr refers to the temperature at the maximum recovery velocity.
Tprog refers to the programming temperature.Tr refers to the temperature at the maximum recovery velocity.The shape recovery velocity of the
second cycle is plotted as a function of temperature as shown in Figure D–F. The reference
polymer (Ref) shows a low velocity (<20° min–1) through the recovery process because the shape recovery is triggered
by the activation of the amorphous chain segments, which are strongly
restricted by the crystalline domains. A low recovery velocity is
generally observed in Tg-based shape-memory
pan class="Chemical">polymers.[8] In contrast, PE-3K shows a quick
recovery in the temperature range of 260–310 °C and reaches
a maximum Vr of ∼60° min–1 at 285 °C, which is close to its Tm (283 °C). The shape recovery is triggered by melting
of the crystalline domains, which is a relatively fast process.
It is worthy to note that the PE-1K film was deformed at 275 °C
in one step; however, this polymer shows two distinct recovery steps
with a maximum recovery velocity of 20–30° min–1 at around 144 and 240 °C, respectively. The first recovery
takes place when the sample passes through the glass transition and
reaches an Rr of ∼42% at 200 °C.
The second recovery is triggered by the melting of the crystalline
domains. These two recovery steps indicate that the crystalline domains
in PE-1K are not able to form a penetrating scaffold throughout the
sample and thus cannot completely lock the amorphous chains. This
allows the sample to partially recover at the Tg – Tm range. These results
demonstrate that the degree of crystallinity, which is reflected in
the ΔHm values in Table , strongly affects the shape
memory behavior of our semicrystalline PAs.The dual-shape memory
behavior of the TPE-based thermosets were investigated using the same
method. Table shows
the shape fixation and recovery results for these samples. All samples
reveal good shape fixation with Rf values
of 93–99%. The TPE-15 samples with the highest cross-linking
density shown in Table exhibit excellent recovery efficiency (Rr > 90%), whereas the other samples show Rr values of 62–66% in the first cycle and 78–82%
in the second and third cycles.
Table 3
Dual-Shape Fixation
and Recovery Results of the TPE Thermoset Films
cycle 1
cycle 2
cycle 3
sample
Tproga (°C)
Trb (°C)
Rf (%)
Rr (%)
Rf (%)
Rr (%)
Rf (%)
Rr (%)
TPE-5
315
277
93
62
93
82
94
82
TPE-10
295
242
98
66
96
78
96
79
TPE-15
275
140, 227
99
93
99
93
97
96
Tprog refers to the programming
temperature.
Tr refers to the temperature at the maximum recovery velocity.
Tprog refers to the programming
temperature.Tr refers to the temperature at the maximum recovery velocity.Figure shows the dual-shape memory cycles and the
recovery velocity of the TPE thermoset films. Similar to the PE-3K
sample, TPE-5 and TPE-10 exhibit one recovery step in the temperature
ranges of 260–300 and 230–270 °C, respectively.
Interestingly, the TPE-15 film also displays two recovery steps, which
is similar to that of the PE-1K film. The two recovery steps originate
from the low degree of crystallinity in TPE-15 and PE-1K, where the
amorphous chain segments cannot be completely fixed when the temperature
is above Tg. TPE-5, TPE-10, and PE-3K,
on the other hand, show higher degrees of crystallinity, and this
prevents the Tg-induced shape recovery.
Figure 6
Three consecutive dual-shape
memory cycles for the TPE series (A) TPE-5, (B) TPE-10, and (C) TPE-15.
Shape recovery velocity as a function of temperature in the second
cycle for the TPE series (D) TPE-5, (E) TPE-10, and (F) TPE-15. Cooling
and heating rate 10 °C min–1 and N2 atmosphere.
Three consecutive dual-shape
memory cycles for the TPE series (A) TPE-5, (B) TPE-10, and (C) TPE-15.
Shape recovery velocity as a function of temperature in the second
cycle for the TPE series (D) TPE-5, (E) TPE-10, and (F) TPE-15. Cooling
and heating rate 10 °C min–1 and N2 atmosphere.The difference between these samples clearly indicates that the
shape memory behavior strongly depends on the degree of crystallinity
of the semicrystalline thermosets. By changing the concentration of
the PE side groups in the reactive copolyamides, the cross-linking
density of the thermosets can be controlled, consequently leading
to adjustable crystallinity and shape memory behavior.
Triple-Shape
Memory Behavior
Based on our study above, two reversible
processes, the glass transition and the melting process, can both
act as the switches to trigger shape recovery. Unlike the traditional
high-temperature triple-SMP composed of multiple components, we were
able to design a single-component triple-pan class="Chemical">SMP using both switches to
achieve two distinct recovery processes.
Figure A shows the three consecutive triple-shape
memory cycles for PE-3K. The film sample was first heated up to 315
°C, which is above the Tm (283 °C)
and rotated by 90° from the original shape A (φA) to a temporary shape B (φB). The sample was cooled
to 200 °C, a temperature between Tm and Tg, to fix the shape B. A second
rotation of 90° was then applied to reach the temporary shape
C (φC). The sample was subsequently cooled to 60
°C, which is below the Tg of 127
°C, to fix the shape C. The external stress was then removed,
leading to the final fixed temporary shape (φf).
A shape fixation rate (Rf) of ∼90%
was calculated using eq .
Figure 7
Three consecutive triple-shape
memory cycles for the PE series (A) PE-3K and (B) PE-1K. Shape recovery
velocity as a function of temperature in the second cycle for the
PE series (C) PE-3K and (D) PE-1K. Cooling and heating rate 10 °C
min–1 and N2 atmosphere.
Three consecutive triple-shape
memory cycles for the PE series (A) PE-3K and (B) PE-1K. Shape recovery
velocity as a function of temperature in the second cycle for the
PE series (C) PE-3K and (D) PE-1K. Cooling and heating rate 10 °C
min–1 and N2 atmosphere.In the subsequent recovery step, the sample was
heated up to 315 °C in a stress-free state to monitor the recovery
of the rotational angle. The shape recovery was accomplished in two
distinct steps, as shown in Figure A. This means the thermoset can memorize two temporary
shapes in one single shape memory cycle. The shape recovery rate Rr(C→B) and Rr(B→A) were calculated based on eqs and 6, respectively.[21]where φA, φB, and φC denote the rotational angle of shape A (φA = 0°),
shape B (φB = 90°), and shape C (φC = 180°); φB/rec and φA/rec are the rotational angles of the first and second recovered shapes,
respectively. Figure B shows the triple-shape memory cycles of PE-1K. This polymer exhibits
a lower Tm (244 °C) compared to PE-3K
(283 °C); therefore, lower programming temperatures (275 and
150 °C) were used.PE-3K shows moderate Rr(C→B) values of 67–80% in the first recovery
step and Rr(B→A) values of 60–73%
in the second recovery step, as listed in Table . Compared to PE-3K, PE-1K shows much higher Rr(C→B) values of 128–138% and
lower Rr(B→A) values of 40–49%.
The first recovery is triggered by the glass transition and is due
to the release of stress in the amorphous phase. The major recovery
takes place in the first step, indicating that the crystalline phase
cannot completely lock the stress in the amorphous phase. The stress,
which is supposed to release in the second recovery step, is actually
partially released in the first recovery step. This, together with
the stress induced by the second deformation, drives the sample to
reach a high recovery rate (>100%) in the first step. This result
is consistent with the result we obtained from the dual-shape memory
experiments and originates from the low degree of crystallinity of
the PE-1K thermoset.
Table 4
Triple-Shape Fixation
and Recovery Results of the PE- and TPE-Series Thermoset Films
cycle 1
cycle 2
cycle 3
sample
Tprog1a (°C)
Tprog2a (°C)
Tr1b (°C)
Tr2b (°C)
Rf (%)
Rr(C–B) (%)
Rr(B–A) (%)
Rf (%)
Rr(C–B) (%)
Rr(B–A) (%)
Rf (%)
Rr(C–B) (%)
Rr(B–A) (%)
PE-3K
315
200
137
289
91
67
60
93
80
66
89
79
73
PE-1K
275
150
144
240
97
128
49
97
135
44
93
139
40
TPE-5
315
200
132
285
88
64
69
86
74
79
86
79
79
TPE-10
295
175
138
250
92
79
91
92
89
80
91
91
82
TPE-15
275
150
133
236
93
97
84
92
123
55
93
136
45
Tprog1 and Tprog2 refer to the first and second programming
temperature, respectively.
Tr1 and Tr2 refer to the temperature at the first and second maximum recovery
velocity, respectively.
Tprog1 and Tprog2 refer to the first and second programming
temperature, respectively.Tr1 and Tr2 refer to the temperature at the first and second maximum recovery
velocity, respectively.Figures C and 7D show the shape recovery
velocity of PE-3K and PE-1K samples as a function of temperature.
The first recovery step of PE-3K shows a lower Vr (13° min–1) than the second step (28°
min–1) because of the limited mobility of the amorphous
chain segments restricted by the crystalline domains. In contrast,
the PE-1K sample shows much higher Vr (54°
min–1) in the first step, which is due to its low
degree of crystallinity.The triple-shape memory cycles and recovery velocity of the TPE thermosets
are shown in Figure . The TPE-5 and TPE-10 films show moderate Rr(C→B) and Rr(B→A) (64–91%) and higher Vr values
in the second recovery step, which is similar to the behavior of PE-3K,
whereas the TPE-15 sample, similar to PE-1K, exhibits high Rr(C→B) (97–136%) and Vr values (38° min–1) in the first
recovery step, because this polymer has the lowest degree of crystallinity.
Figure 8
Three consecutive triple-shape memory
cycles for (A) TPE-5, (B) TPE-10, and (C) TPE-15. Angular velocity
of shape recovery as a function of temperature in the second cycle
for (D) TPE-5, (E) TPE-10, and (F) TPE-15. Cooling and heating rate
10 °C min–1 and N2 atmosphere.
Three consecutive triple-shape memory
cycles for (A) TPE-5, (B) TPE-10, and (C) TPE-15. Angular velocity
of shape recovery as a function of temperature in the second cycle
for (D) TPE-5, (E) TPE-10, and (F) TPE-15. Cooling and heating rate
10 °C min–1 and N2 atmosphere.The temperatures at the first maximum recovery velocity (Tr1) of all samples are within a narrow range
of 132–144 °C because the Tg of all samples is around 125 °C. However, the temperatures
of the second maximum recovery velocity (Tr2), which depend on the Tm of the samples,
display a broad variation between 236 and 289 °C. Therefore,
the triple-shape memory behavior of the thermosets is highly tunable
over a wide temperature regime.Besides deforming the sample in
one direction only, more interestingly, we can involve both forward
and backward deformations in a triple-shape memory cycle; therefore,
the corresponding temporary shapes would recover in a reverse direction.
To demonstrate this, the TPE-10 thermoset sample, which shows a high Rf (>90%), Rr(C–B) (∼90%), and Rr(B–A) (∼80%),
was selected as a representative example.The results of test
I are shown in Figure A,B. The sample was programmed forward and backward by 180°
in two steps and reached a final temporary shape, which is identical
to the original shape. The subsequent heating resulted in an increase
in angle in the first recovery step achieving a maximum recovery velocity
at 142 °C and an Rr(C–B) of
79–91% at 213 °C. By increasing the temperature further,
the sample recovered in the reverse direction reaching a maximum recovery
velocity at 243 °C and an Rr(B–A) of 81–87% (Table ). These results demonstrate that our semicrystalline PA thermosets
show one-way reversible shape memory behavior. The reversible shape
changes in this experiment occurred without application of any external
force. The shape changes were driven by internal stress of the oppositely
strained networks formed in the first and second programming steps.
Figure 9
Three
consecutive triple-shape memory cycles for TPE-10 and shape recovery
velocity as a function of temperature in the second cycle. (A) and
(B) deformation of 180° and −180° in two steps, respectively;
(C) and (D) deformation of 180° and −360° in two
steps, respectively.
Table 5
Triple-Shape
Fixation and Recovery Results of TPE-10 Deformed in Two Opposite Directions
test
cycle no.
Δφd1a (deg)
Δφd2a (deg)
Rf (%)
Rr(C–B) (%)
Rr(B–A) (%)
Tmaxb (°C)
I
1
180
–180
97
91
81
213
2
180
–180
98
85
81
211
3
180
–180
99
79
87
209
II
1
180
–360
90
86
54
218
2
180
–360
89
83
59
213
3
180
–360
91
82
61
212
Δφd1 and Δφd2 refer to the deformation
angles in the first and second deformation steps.
Tmax refers to the
temperature at the maximum angle.
Three
consecutive triple-shape memory cycles for TPE-10 and shape recovery
velocity as a function of temperature in the second cycle. (A) and
(B) deformation of 180° and −180° in two steps, respectively;
(C) and (D) deformation of 180° and −360° in two
steps, respectively.Δφd1 and Δφd2 refer to the deformation
angles in the first and second deformation steps.Tmax refers to the
temperature at the maximum angle.We can adjust the second programming step from Δφd2 = −180° to Δφd2 = −360°
in test II, which results in two opposite temporary shapes, as shown
in Figure C,D. The
sample shows a Rf of 89–91%, Rr(C–B) of 82–86%, and Rr(B–A) of 54–61% (Table ). The maximum recovery velocity
occurs at 142 and 244 °C in the first and second recovery steps,
respectively, which is consistent with the results of Test I. Our
results clearly demonstrate that high-temperature SME with tunable
recovery directions and amplitudes can be designed based on our single-component
semicrystalline polyamide thermosets.
Conclusions
We have
investigated two novel series semicrystalline PA thermosets and demonstrated
that they can be as single-component high-temperature (>200 °C)
shape memory polymers (SMPs). Two molecular design approaches based
on reactive phenylethynyl (PE) functionalities have been explored:
cross-linked semicrystalline PA films were prepared by curing reactive
thermoplastic PA 10T oligomers, and films were prepared by curing
reactive thermoplastic side-group functionalized copolyamides. Compared
to the thermoplastic PA 10T reference polymer, the PE-3K, TPE-5, and
TPE-10 thermoset films show high-temperature dual-shape memory behavior
(>200 °C) when Tm is used as the
switching temperature. The densely cross-linked PE-1K and TPE-15 films
show the highest fixation rate (99%) and recovery rate (≥90%)
and two distinct recovery steps because the degree of crystallinity
is too low and cannot provide a scaffold that locks the shape at temperatures
between Tg and Tm. Triple-shape memory behavior can be demonstrated when the Tg (∼125 °C) is used as the second
switching temperature. The recovery rate of the two recovery steps
is highly dependent on the degree of crystallinity of the thermosets
and vary within a broad range of 74%–139% and 40–82%
for the first and second step, respectively. One-way reversible shape
memory events can also be designed when we perform forward and backward
deformation in a triple shape memory cycle. We also studied the recovery
velocity as a function of temperature to elaborate the thermokinematics
of the shape recovery process. The use of phenylethynyl reactive functionalities
allows us to control the degree of crystallinity in the final polyamide
thermosets and in turn tune their shape memory behavior in terms of
recovery temperature, velocity, and efficiency. We believe that the
design rules presented herein will help in designing new shape memory
polymers based on well-known semicrystalline polyamide chemistries.
Authors: Joshua C Worch; Andrew C Weems; Jiayi Yu; Maria C Arno; Thomas R Wilks; Robert T R Huckstepp; Rachel K O'Reilly; Matthew L Becker; Andrew P Dove Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 14.919