Literature DB >> 29742466

Systematic clinical management of patients with candidemia improves survival.

Rita Murri1, Francesca Giovannenze2, Marta Camici1, Riccardo Torelli3, Giulio Ventura1, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo1, Maurizio Sanguinetti3, Roberto Cauda1, Massimo Fantoni1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Taking into account the significant morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs related to Candidemia, our objective is to define if improving appropriateness in candidemia management was associated with better clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective observational monocentric cohort study was conducted. Adherence to five main elements was examined: appropriate selection of initial therapy; follow-up blood culture; echocardiography; ophthalmological examination; and removal of a central venous catheter. The correlation between the number of appropriate elements achieved and 30 day survival was examined.
RESULTS: Patients with candidemia (n = 213) were enrolled. Adherence to all five elements was achieved in 36 cases (16.9%), while the majority adhered to three or four elements (28.2% and 37.1%, respectively). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that the number of elements achieved was associated with survival [HR: 0.39 (0.30-0.52); p < 0.001]. Also, the number of elements achieved correlated positively with duration of therapy (p = 0.01), but not length of hospital stay (p = 0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: Five elements, including therapeutic and non-therapeutic-related aspects, of care were good indicators of appropriate management of patients with candidemia. Implementation of evidence-based practice regarding optimal clinical management is crucial for any antimicrobial stewardship program.
Copyright © 2018 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic stewardship; Appropriateness; Bloodstream infections; Candidemia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29742466     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  4 in total

Review 1.  Essentials in Candida bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Sibylle C Mellinghoff; O A Cornely; N Jung
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Epidemiology of candidemia and impact of infectious disease consultation on survival and care.

Authors:  Arno Mohr; Michaela Simon; Tobias Joha; Frank Hanses; Bernd Salzberger; Florian Hitzenbichler
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Retrospective evaluation of candidemic patients among general surgery department in a tertiary care university hospital.

Authors:  Uğur Önal; Dilek Yeşim Metin; Can Karaca; Süleyha Hilmioğlu Polat; Sinan Ersin; Meltem Işıkgöz Taşbakan
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-09-23

4.  Epidemiology, species distribution, and outcome of nosocomial Candida spp. bloodstream infection in Shanghai: an 11-year retrospective analysis in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Zheng; Ting Xie; Er-Zhen Chen; Zhi-Tao Yang; Lin Wu; Xiao-Ying Liu; Ling Zhu; Ying Chen; En-Qiang Mao; Li-Zhong Han
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.944

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.