Literature DB >> 29741911

Long-term Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 17-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Matjaz Sajovic1, Domen Stropnik1, Katja Skaza2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short-term and mid-term differences between hamstring and patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are well documented. Systematic reviews highlight the lack of long-term results between the two grafts. HYPOTHESIS: Seventeen years after ACL reconstruction, no difference will be found in functional outcome, quality of life, and graft failure between patients with patellar tendon (PT) or semitendinosus and gracilis tendon (STG) autografts; however, a significant difference will be seen in the prevalence of osteoarthritis. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients were included in this prospective study (32 in each group). A single surgeon performed primary ACL reconstruction in alternating sequence. Forty-eight patients (24 in each group) were evaluated 17 years after ACL reconstruction: A clinical assessment was made based on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, instrumented laxity was measured with KT-1000 arthrometer, and radiography of the operated knee was conducted and assessed for degenerative disease. The Lysholm questionnaire and the Short Form-36 version 2 questionnaire were filled out by the patients.
RESULTS: At the 17-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to graft failure (2 reruptures in the semitendinosus and gracilis tendon [STG] group [6.3%] and 3 reruptures in the PT group [9.4%]) and functional outcome. Increased instrumented laxity (>3 mm) measured with KT-1000 arthrometer was seen in significantly more patients in the STG group (8 in the STG group compared with 2 in the PT group; P = .03) with a mean side-to-side difference of 2.17 ± 1.86 mm in the STG group compared with 1.33 ± 1.93 mm in the PT group. A significant difference was found in frequency of knee osteoarthritis (OA)-100% in the PT group compared with 71% in the STG group ( P = .004). Patients in the PT group tended to have higher grade OA according to the IKDC grading system, with an average grade of 1.46 in the PT group compared with 1 in the STG group ( P = .055). The degenerative changes in the PT group were more common in the medial and patellofemoral compartments ( P = .003 and P = .04, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Both autografts provided good to excellent subjective outcomes. No significant differences were noted in graft failure and clinical instability. However, significantly more patients in the STG group had increased instrumented anteroposterior translation measured with KT-1000 arthrometer, and there was a greater prevalence of knee OA at 17 years after surgery in the PT group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL and osteoarthritis; anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; hamstring tendon; long-term; patellar tendon; quality of life; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29741911     DOI: 10.1177/0363546518768768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades.

Authors:  Markus P Arnold; Jacob G Calcei; Nicole Vogel; Robert A Magnussen; Mark Clatworthy; Tim Spalding; John D Campbell; John A Bergfeld; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Early clinical and neuromuscular properties in patients with normal or sub-normal subjective knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Domen Stropnik; Matjaž Sajovic; Alan Kacin; Simona Pavlič-Založnik; Matej Drobnič
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon vs Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Mean Follow-up of 15 Years.

Authors:  Connor G Hoge; Robert N Matar; Lafi S Khalil; John A Buchan; Cole M Johnson; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-04

4.  Size and Shape of the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament and the Impact of Sex and Skeletal Growth: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Danielle Howe; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2019-06

5.  Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with increased anterior tibial translation and fewer meniscal injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.

Authors:  David Sundemo; Christina Mikkelsen; Riccardo Cristiani; Magnus Forssblad; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Eleonor Svantesson; Kristian Samuelsson; Anders Stålman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 50 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chong-Wei Tan; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Pei-An Yu; Chi-Lung Chen; Liang-Tseng Kuo; Ching-Chi Chi; Dokyung Kim; Geon Park
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Evaluation of a bioengineered ACL matrix's osteointegration with BMP-2 supplementation.

Authors:  Paulos Y Mengsteab; Patrick Conroy; Mary Badon; Takayoshi Otsuka; Ho-Man Kan; Anthony T Vella; Lakshmi S Nair; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts Versus Hamstring Autografts Using the Same Suspensory Fixations in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenbo Chen; Hong Li; Yuzhou Chen; Fangyi Jiang; Yang Wu; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-27

9.  Evaluation of Graft Tensioning Effects in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction between Hamstring and Bone-Patellar Tendon Bone Autografts.

Authors:  Steven F DeFroda; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Ross Budacki; Taylor Wiley; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Braden C Fleming; Brett D Owens
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.501

10.  Outcome of bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with a 5-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Lilian Zhao; Mingfeng Lu; Mingcong Deng; Jisi Xing; Lilei He; Changbing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.