Rany Abend1,2,3, Roy Sar-El2,4, Tal Gonen2, Itamar Jalon2,5, Sharon Vaisvaser2, Yair Bar-Haim1,5, Talma Hendler1,2,4,5. 1. School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. Functional Brain Center, Wohl Institute for Advanced Imaging, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Section on Development and Affective Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 5. Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Implicit regulation of emotions involves medial-prefrontal cortex (mPFC) regions exerting regulatory control over limbic structures. Diminished regulation relates to aberrant mPFC functionality and psychopathology. Establishing means of modulating mPFC functionality could benefit research on emotion and its dysregulation. Here, we tested the capacity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting mPFC to modulate subjective emotional states by facilitating implicit emotion regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stimulation was applied concurrently with functional magnetic resonance imaging to validate its neurobehavioral effect. Sixteen participants were each scanned twice, counterbalancing active and sham tDCS application, while undergoing negative mood induction (clips featuring negative vs. neutral contents). Effects of stimulation on emotional experience were assessed using subjective and neural measures. RESULTS: Subjectively, active stimulation led to significant reduction in reported intensity of experienced emotions to negatively valenced (p = 0.005) clips but not to neutral clips (p > 0.99). Active stimulation further mitigated a rise in stress levels from pre- to post-induction (sham: p = 0.004; active: p = 0.15). Neurally, stimulation increased activation in mPFC regions associated with implicit emotion regulation (ventromedial-prefrontal cortex; subgenual anterior-cingulate cortex, sgACC), and in ventral striatum, a core limbic structure (all ps < 0.05). Stimulation also altered functional connectivity (assessed using whole-brain psycho-physiological interaction) between these regions, and with additional limbic regions. Stimulation-induced sgACC activation correlated with reported emotion intensity and depressive symptoms (rs > 0.64, ps < 0.018), suggesting individual differences in stimulation responsivity. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate the potential capacity of tDCS to facilitate brain activation in mPFC regions underlying implicit regulation of emotion and accordingly modulate subjective emotional experiences.
OBJECTIVES: Implicit regulation of emotions involves medial-prefrontal cortex (mPFC) regions exerting regulatory control over limbic structures. Diminished regulation relates to aberrant mPFC functionality and psychopathology. Establishing means of modulating mPFC functionality could benefit research on emotion and its dysregulation. Here, we tested the capacity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting mPFC to modulate subjective emotional states by facilitating implicit emotion regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stimulation was applied concurrently with functional magnetic resonance imaging to validate its neurobehavioral effect. Sixteen participants were each scanned twice, counterbalancing active and sham tDCS application, while undergoing negative mood induction (clips featuring negative vs. neutral contents). Effects of stimulation on emotional experience were assessed using subjective and neural measures. RESULTS: Subjectively, active stimulation led to significant reduction in reported intensity of experienced emotions to negatively valenced (p = 0.005) clips but not to neutral clips (p > 0.99). Active stimulation further mitigated a rise in stress levels from pre- to post-induction (sham: p = 0.004; active: p = 0.15). Neurally, stimulation increased activation in mPFC regions associated with implicit emotion regulation (ventromedial-prefrontal cortex; subgenual anterior-cingulate cortex, sgACC), and in ventral striatum, a core limbic structure (all ps < 0.05). Stimulation also altered functional connectivity (assessed using whole-brain psycho-physiological interaction) between these regions, and with additional limbic regions. Stimulation-induced sgACC activation correlated with reported emotion intensity and depressive symptoms (rs > 0.64, ps < 0.018), suggesting individual differences in stimulation responsivity. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate the potential capacity of tDCS to facilitate brain activation in mPFC regions underlying implicit regulation of emotion and accordingly modulate subjective emotional experiences.
Authors: Norman A S Farb; Zindel V Segal; Helen Mayberg; Jim Bean; Deborah McKeon; Zainab Fatima; Adam K Anderson Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Tor D Wager; Vanessa A van Ast; Brent L Hughes; Matthew L Davidson; Martin A Lindquist; Kevin N Ochsner Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Young Goo Kim; Song E Kim; Jihye Lee; Sungeun Hwang; Seung-Schik Yoo; Hyang Woon Lee Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Hamed Ekhtiari; Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari; Axel Thielscher; Andrea Antal; Lucia M Li; A Duke Shereen; Yuranny Cabral-Calderin; Daniel Keeser; Til Ole Bergmann; Asif Jamil; Ines R Violante; Jorge Almeida; Marcus Meinzer; Hartwig R Siebner; Adam J Woods; Charlotte J Stagg; Rany Abend; Daria Antonenko; Tibor Auer; Marc Bächinger; Chris Baeken; Helen C Barron; Henry W Chase; Jenny Crinion; Abhishek Datta; Matthew H Davis; Mohsen Ebrahimi; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Brian Falcone; Valentina Fiori; Iman Ghodratitoostani; Gadi Gilam; Roland H Grabner; Joel D Greenspan; Georg Groen; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tobias U Hauser; Christoph S Herrmann; Chi-Hung Juan; Bart Krekelberg; Stephanie Lefebvre; Sook-Lei Liew; Kristoffer H Madsen; Rasoul Mahdavifar-Khayati; Nastaran Malmir; Paola Marangolo; Andrew K Martin; Timothy J Meeker; Hossein Mohaddes Ardabili; Marius Moisa; Davide Momi; Beni Mulyana; Alexander Opitz; Natasza Orlov; Patrick Ragert; Christian C Ruff; Giulio Ruffini; Michaela Ruttorf; Arshiya Sangchooli; Klaus Schellhorn; Gottfried Schlaug; Bernhard Sehm; Ghazaleh Soleimani; Hosna Tavakoli; Benjamin Thompson; Dagmar Timmann; Aki Tsuchiyagaito; Martin Ulrich; Johannes Vosskuhl; Christiane A Weinrich; Mehran Zare-Bidoky; Xiaochu Zhang; Benedikt Zoefel; Michael A Nitsche; Marom Bikson Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 17.021
Authors: Lilian Konicar; Karin Prillinger; Manfred Klöbl; Rupert Lanzenberger; Andrea Antal; Paul L Plener Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 5.435