Literature DB >> 29741689

Cryoballoon ablation in the elderly: one year outcome and safety of the second-generation 28mm cryoballoon in patients over 75 years old.

Verena Tscholl1, Tina Lin2, Abdullah Khaled-A Lsharaf1, Barbara Bellmann1, Patrick Nagel1, Klaus Lenz3, Ulf Landmesser1, Mattias Roser1, Andreas Rillig1.   

Abstract

Aims: The efficacy of the second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated previously. Data on the efficacy of CB ablation in elderly patients is missing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term success rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients ≥75 years vs. <75 years using the second-generation 28mm CB. Methods and results: Eighty patients [n = 40 ≥75 years (Group 1); n = 40 <75 years (Group 2)] with paroxysmal [n = 37 (46%) or persistent (n = 43 (54%)] AF were included. Median follow-up was 12 [6;18] months (Group 1 vs. 13 [6;27]) months (Group 2; P = 0.8). PVI was performed in all patients using cryoablation. Follow-up was obtained using 24h-Holter monitoring or via an implanted loop recorder or pacemaker. CHA2DS2VASc-Score (Group 1: 4 [4;5] vs. Group 2: 2 [1;3], P < 0.001) and HASBLED-Score (Group 1: 2 [2;3] and Group 2: 2 [1;3], (P = 0.009)) differed significantly between the two groups. Mean fluoroscopy time was 22.9 [16.3;31.9] in Group 1 and 24.5 [19.1;30.6] in Group 2 (P = 0.75), and mean procedure time was 125 min [105;151] in Group 1 and 130.5 min [117.5;147.3] in Group 2 (P = 0.66). Arrhythmia recurrence was similar in Group 1 and Group 2 (12/40 (30%) vs. 10/40 (25%) (P = 0.62). One transient ischaemic attack occurred in Group 2. No further major complications were documented in this patients cohort.
Conclusion: CB ablation in patients ≥75 years has favourable success rates and similar complication rates compared with patients <75 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29741689     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

1.  Procedural success, safety and patients satisfaction after second ablation of atrial fibrillation in the elderly: results from the German Ablation Registry.

Authors:  Thomas Fink; Andreas Metzner; Stephan Willems; Lars Eckardt; Hüseyin Ince; Johannes Brachmann; Stefan G Spitzer; Thomas Deneke; Claus Schmitt; Matthias Hochadel; Jochen Senges; Andreas Rillig
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in relation to the Patients' Age: Results from a Large Real-World Multicenter Observational Project.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Saverio Iacopino; Giuseppe Arena; Claudio Tondo; Paolo Pieragnoli; Giulio Molon; Massimiliano Manfrin; Antonio Curnis; Antonio Dello Russo; Giovanni Rovaris; Giuseppe Stabile; Leonardo Calò; Gabriele Boscolo; Roberto Verlato
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: A real-world evidence.

Authors:  Tauseef Akhtar; Ryan Wallace; Usama A Daimee; Bhradeev Sivasambu; Erica Hart; Eunice Yang; Joseph E Marine; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins; David Spragg
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-11-25

Review 4.  Do Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Have Comparable Ablation Outcomes Compared to Younger Ones? Evidence from Pooled Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Feng Li; Lei Zhang; Li-Da Wu; Zhi-Yuan Zhang; Huan-Huan Liu; Zhen-Ye Zhang; Jie Zhang; Ling-Ling Qian; Ru-Xing Wang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Comparing between second-generation cryoballoon vs open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation in elderly patients: Acute and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Chen; Yi-Gang Zhong; Chao-Lun Jin; Xiao-Fei Gao; Xiao-Hua Liu; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Feasibility, safety, and acute efficacy of the fourth-generation cryoballoon for ablation of atrial fibrillation: Another step forward?

Authors:  Laura Rottner; Shibu Mathew; Bruno Reissmann; Laura Warneke; Isabell Martin; Christine Lemes; Tilman Maurer; Peter Wohlmuth; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Andreas Metzner; Andreas Rillig
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Costs and long-term outcomes following pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients using second-generation cryoballoon vs. open-irrigated radiofrequency in China.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Chen; Mei-Jun Liu; Chao-Lun Jin; Xiao-Fei Gao; Xiao-Hua Liu; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Efficacy and safety of the second-generation cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Gaëlle Vermeersch; Juan-Pablo Abugattas; Varnavas Varnavas; Jeroen De Cocker; Bruno Schwagten; Juan Sieira; Carlo de Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Yves De Greef
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-03-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.