Literature DB >> 29741198

The Use of Figurative Language to Describe Frailty in Older Adults.

B Buta1, D Leder, R Miller, N L Schoenborn, A R Green, R Varadhan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Frailty affects 15% of non-institutionalized older adults in the United States, yet confusion remains in defining and, in turn, assessing frailty. Figurative language, such as metaphor, can help to explain difficult scientific concepts and to form new theories. We aimed to examine the use of figurative language to describe frailty and to identify themes in the way figurative expressions are used. Understanding how frailty is described figuratively may offer insights for developing useful communication approaches in research settings.
METHODS: We performed a comprehensive review of editorials in the scientific literature to explore figurative language used to describe frailty in older adults. We categorized themes among the figurative expressions, which may help to inform how to effectively communicate about frailty.
RESULTS: We found 24 editorials containing 32 figurative expressions. The figurative expressions conceptualized frailty in six ways: 1) a complex, multifaceted concept; 2) an important issue in health and medicine; 3) indicative of something that is failing or faulty; 4) indicative of fragility; 5) representative of vulnerable, ignored persons; and 6) an opportunity for self-awareness and reflection. DISCUSSION: Our review highlights the heterogeneity in depictions of frailty, which is consonant with the lack of a standardized definition of frailty. We also found a novel aspect to the concept of frailty, which merits attention: frailty characterized as an opportunity for self-awareness and reflection. Figurative language, which often juxtaposes familiar with challenging, complex concepts, can offer insights on issues in frailty research and holds potential as a tool for researchers to improve communication about this important and debated medical condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frailty; health communication and language; review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29741198      PMCID: PMC5997276          DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2018.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Frailty Aging        ISSN: 2260-1341


  43 in total

1.  Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm--issues and controversies.

Authors:  Howard Bergman; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik; David B Hogan; Silvia Hummel; Sathya Karunananthan; Christina Wolfson
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Combating the Tithonus error: what works?

Authors:  Aubrey D N J de Grey
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.663

3.  Understanding frailty.

Authors:  Walter Bortz
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Taking care of the frail elder: a vital balance.

Authors:  P R Ebersole
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.361

5.  Defining frailty: "I know it when I see it".

Authors:  Alan Speir
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.

Authors:  L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Strategies of influence in medical authorship.

Authors:  J Z Segal
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Frailty consensus: a call to action.

Authors:  John E Morley; Bruno Vellas; G Abellan van Kan; Stefan D Anker; Juergen M Bauer; Roberto Bernabei; Matteo Cesari; W C Chumlea; Wolfram Doehner; Jonathan Evans; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Paul R Katz; Theodore K Malmstrom; Roger J McCarter; Luis M Gutierrez Robledo; Ken Rockwood; Stephan von Haehling; Maurits F Vandewoude; Jeremy Walston
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 9.  Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments.

Authors:  Brian J Buta; Jeremy D Walston; Job G Godino; Minsun Park; Rita R Kalyani; Qian-Li Xue; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Ravi Varadhan
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 10.895

10.  What is a good editorial?

Authors:  Ajai Singh; Shakuntala Singh
Journal:  Mens Sana Monogr       Date:  2006-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Feasibility and acceptability of commonly used screening instruments to identify frailty among community-dwelling older people: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Rachel C Ambagtsheer; Mandy M Archibald; Michael Lawless; Alison Kitson; Justin Beilby
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.921

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.