Literature DB >> 29740979

Otoplasty techniques in children: a comparative study of outcomes.

Puvesh Punj1, Hsu Phie Chong1, Thomas P Cundy1, Michelle Lodge1, Roger Woods1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous otoplasty techniques have been described in the literature to correct prominent ears; however, few have focused on the complication rates. We reviewed our experience aiming to assess peri-operative care requirements and complication rates.
METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of 207 otoplasty procedures performed in 119 patients over a 5-year period (2009-2014) at the Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide. Information pertaining to demographic details, length of stay, otoplasty technique and complications (early and late) were obtained.
RESULTS: In the study period, 97% of the 119 patients had an overnight stay. There was an early complication of 2.2% (return to theatre for bleeding) in the modified Chongchet technique and 0.9% (wound infection) in the Mustarde technique. Late complications included suture extrusion (1.9%) with the Mustarde technique and hypertrophic scarring (2.2%) in the modified Chongchet technique. The recurrence rate requiring revision following modified Chongchet technique was 10% and Mustarde technique was 2.9%. The Mustarde otoplasty technique was associated with a slightly lower antiemetic requirement than the Chongchet technique (3.2 versus 14.3%, P = 0.032). Both techniques had comparable opioid analgesic requirement of 30-35% post-operatively (P = 0.248).
CONCLUSION: Our results are comparable to the huge variation in available literature. We note the higher revision rate following modified Chongchet technique. Both techniques had a low and acceptable rate of post-operative analgesia and antiemetic requirement. We are considering either otoplasty technique as a day surgery procedure within our unit with the provision of adequate patient support as a safe and economical advance.
© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chongchet; Mustarde; complication; otoplasty; prominauris; revision

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29740979     DOI: 10.1111/ans.14386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  4 in total

1.  Anterior versus Posterior Scoring of Cartilage in Otoplasty: A Retrospective Patient-related Outcome Measurement Study.

Authors:  Johannes A Smit; Dominique W Coenen; Eline A van Amerongen; P Quinten Ruhé; Corstiaan C Breugem
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-06-09

2.  Outcomes and Complications of the Mustardé Otoplasty: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for the Prominent Ear Deformity.

Authors:  Matthew L Boroditsky; Aaron C Van Slyke; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-24

3.  Minimally Invasive Technique for Correction of Prominent Ear.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima; Mohammed Saad Hasaballah; Ossama Mustafa Mady
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 4.  Nonsurgical Treatment for Congenital Auricular Deformities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huanhuan Wu; Zehao Niu; Guo Li; Yan Li; Bingqing Wang; Jing Qian; Yue Wang; Hanyi Jiang; Youbai Chen; Yan Han
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.326

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.