Literature DB >> 29740733

Modification of Housing Mobility Experimental Effects on Delinquency and Educational Problems: Middle Adolescence as a Sensitive Period.

Nicole M Schmidt1, Marvin D Krohn2, Theresa L Osypuk3.   

Abstract

Residential mobility is one documented stressor contributing to higher delinquency and worse educational outcomes. Sensitive period life course models suggest that certain developmental stages make individuals more susceptible to the effects of an exposure, like residential mobility, on outcomes. However, most prior research is observational, and has not examined heterogeneity across age or gender that may inform sensitive periods, even though it may have important implications for the etiology of adolescent development. Moreover, there are important translational implications for identifying the groups most vulnerable to residential mobility to inform how to buffer adverse effects of moving. In this study, low-income families were randomized to residential mobility out of public housing into lower poverty neighborhoods using a rental subsidy voucher ("experimental voucher condition"), and were compared to control families remaining in public housing. The sample was comprised of 2829 youth (51% female; 62% Non-Hispanic Black, 31% Hispanic, 7% other race). At baseline, youth ranged from 5 to 16 years old. This study hypothesized that random assignment to the housing voucher condition would generate harmful effects on delinquency and educational problems, compared to the control group, among boys who were older at baseline. The results confirmed this hypothesis: random assignment to the experimental voucher condition generating residential mobility caused higher delinquency among boys who were 13-16 years old at baseline, compared to same-age, in-place public housing controls. However, residential mobility did not affect delinquency among girls regardless of age, or among boys who were 5-12 years old at baseline. The pattern of results for educational problems was similar but weaker. Families with teenage boys are particularly vulnerable to residential transitions. Incorporating additional supports into housing programs may help low-income, urban families to successfully transition to lower poverty neighborhoods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29740733      PMCID: PMC6222002          DOI: 10.1007/s10964-018-0859-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Youth Adolesc        ISSN: 0047-2891


  53 in total

1.  Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance?

Authors:  S Pribesh; D B Downey
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1999-11

2.  Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes--a randomized social experiment.

Authors:  Jens Ludwig; Lisa Sanbonmatsu; Lisa Gennetian; Emma Adam; Greg J Duncan; Lawrence F Katz; Ronald C Kessler; Jeffrey R Kling; Stacy Tessler Lindau; Robert C Whitaker; Thomas W McDade
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Does residential mobility improve educational outcomes? Evidence from the Netherlands.

Authors:  Carla Haelermans; Kristof De Witte
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2015-03-05

4.  Moving teenagers out of high-risk neighborhoods: how girls fare better than boys.

Authors:  Susan Clampet-Lundquist; Jeffrey R Kling; Kathryn Edin; Greg J Duncan
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2011-01

5.  Impact of family relocation on children's growth, development, school function, and behavior.

Authors:  D Wood; N Halfon; D Scarlata; P Newacheck; S Nessim
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.

Authors:  Raj Chetty; Nathaniel Hendren; Lawrence F Katz
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2016-04

7.  Toward a policy-relevant analysis of geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in child health.

Authors:  Dolores Acevedo-Garcia; Theresa L Osypuk; Nancy McArdle; David R Williams
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Early intervention in low birth weight premature infants: results at 18 years of age for the Infant Health and Development Program.

Authors:  Marie C McCormick; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn; Stephen L Buka; Julie Goldman; Jennifer Yu; Mikhail Salganik; David T Scott; Forrest C Bennett; Libby L Kay; Judy C Bernbaum; Charles R Bauer; Camilia Martin; Elizabeth R Woods; Anne Martin; Patrick H Casey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Frailty modifies effectiveness of psychosocial intervention in recovery from stroke.

Authors:  K A Ertel; M M Glymour; T A Glass; L F Berkman
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.477

10.  Future research directions for understanding neighborhood contributions to health disparities.

Authors:  T L Osypuk
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 1.019

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neighborhoods, Schools, and Adolescent Violence: Ecological Relative Deprivation, Disadvantage Saturation, or Cumulative Disadvantage?

Authors:  Nicolo P Pinchak; Raymond R Swisher
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-01-09

2.  Long-Term Effects of Local-Area New Deal Work Relief in Childhood on Educational, Economic, and Health Outcomes Over the Life Course: Evidence From the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sepideh Modrek; Evan Roberts; John Robert Warren; David Rehkopf
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2022-08-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.