Literature DB >> 29740649

Traction cytometry: regularization in the Fourier approach and comparisons with finite element method.

Ankur H Kulkarni1, Prasenjit Ghosh, Ashwin Seetharaman, Paturu Kondaiah, Namrata Gundiah.   

Abstract

Traction forces exerted by adherent cells are quantified using displacements of embedded markers on polyacrylamide substrates due to cell contractility. Fourier Transform Traction Cytometry (FTTC) is widely used to calculate tractions but has inherent limitations due to errors in the displacement fields; these are mitigated through a regularization parameter (γ) in the Reg-FTTC method. An alternate finite element (FE) approach computes tractions on a domain using known boundary conditions. Robust verification and recovery studies are lacking but essential in assessing the accuracy and noise sensitivity of the traction solutions from the different methods. We implemented the L2 regularization method and defined a maximum curvature point in the traction with γ plot as the optimal regularization parameter (γ*) in the Reg-FTTC approach. Traction reconstructions using γ* yield accurate values of low and maximum tractions (Tmax) in the presence of up to 5% noise. Reg-FTTC is hence a clear improvement over the FTTC method but is inadequate to reconstruct low stresses such as those at nascent focal adhesions. FE, implemented using a node-by-node comparison, showed an intermediate reconstruction compared to Reg-FTTC. We performed experiments using mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) and compared results between these approaches. Tractions from FTTC and FE showed differences of ∼92% and 22% as compared to Reg-FTTC. Selection of an optimum value of γ for each cell reduced variability in the computed tractions as compared to using a single value of γ for all the MEF cells in this study.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29740649     DOI: 10.1039/c7sm02214j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  6 in total

1.  High Throughput Traction Force Microscopy for Multicellular Islands on Combinatorial Microarrays.

Authors:  Ian C Berg; Gregory H Underhill
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-11-05

Review 2.  The cellular mechanobiology of aging: from biology to mechanics.

Authors:  Apratim Bajpai; Rui Li; Weiqiang Chen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Traction force microscopy with optimized regularization and automated Bayesian parameter selection for comparing cells.

Authors:  Yunfei Huang; Christoph Schell; Tobias B Huber; Ahmet Nihat Şimşek; Nils Hersch; Rudolf Merkel; Gerhard Gompper; Benedikt Sabass
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A primer to traction force microscopy.

Authors:  Andrea Zancla; Pamela Mozetic; Monica Orsini; Giancarlo Forte; Alberto Rainer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 5.486

5.  Additive Manufacturing of Viscoelastic Polyacrylamide Substrates for Mechanosensing Studies.

Authors:  Fardeen Kabir Protick; Sadat Kamal Amit; Kshitij Amar; Shukantu Dev Nath; Rafee Akand; Virginia A Davis; Sabrina Nilufar; Farhan Chowdhury
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 6.  Biophysics of Cell-Substrate Interactions Under Shear.

Authors:  Neha Paddillaya; Ashish Mishra; Paturu Kondaiah; Pramod Pullarkat; Gautam I Menon; Namrata Gundiah
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-11-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.