| Literature DB >> 29740480 |
Marina Muñoz1,2,3, Milena Camargo2,4,5, Juan D Ramírez1.
Abstract
Members of the Cryptococcus complex, includes Cryptococcus neoformans (most common fungal infection of the brain) and Cryptococcus gattii (high-impact emerging pathogen worldwide). Currently, the fungal multilocus sequence typing database (Fungal MLST Database) constitutes a valuable data repository of the genes used for molecular typing of these pathogens. We analyzed the data available in the Fungal MLST Database for seven housekeeping genes, with the aim to evaluate its contribution in the description of intra-taxa diversity, population genetic structure, and evolutionary patterns. Although the Fungal MLST Database has a greater number of reports for C. neoformans (n = 487) than for C. gattii (n = 344), similar results were obtained for both species in terms of allelic diversity. Phylogenetic reconstructions revealed grouping by molecular type in both species and allowed us to propose differences in evolutionary patterns (gradualism in the case of C. neoformans and punctuated evolution in the case of C. gattii). In addition, C. neoformans showed a population genetic structure consisting of 37 clonal complexes (CCs; CC1 being predominant), high crosslinking [without sequence type (ST) grouping by molecular type], marked divergence events in phylogenetic analysis, and few introgression events (mainly between VNI and VNIV). By contrast, C. gattii showed 50 CCs (with greater homogeneity in ST number by CC) and clustering by molecular type with marked crosslinking events in phylogenetic networks being less evident. Understanding relationships at the molecular level for species of the Cryptococcus complex, based on the sequences of the housekeeping genes, provides information for describing the evolutionary history of these emerging pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: C. gattii; C. neoformans; allelic diversity; evolutionary history; multilocus sequence typing (MLST); population structure
Year: 2018 PMID: 29740480 PMCID: PMC5928140 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Diversity indexes for the markers in the MLST schemes for Cryptococcus species.
| All loci | All loci | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence length | 655 | 555 | 799 | 478 | 534 | 545 | 661 | 4230 | 558 | 551 | 767 | 480 | 713 | 717 | 718 | 4254 |
| Number of sequences used | 48 | 32 | 77 | 36 | 36 | 55 | 48 | 487 | 74 | 49 | 89 | 53 | 42 | 107 | 44 | 344 |
| Identity (%) | 32.06 | 83.06 | 14.23 | 82.85 | 84.83 | 76.51 | 32.52 | – | 85.66 | 81.85 | 58.15 | 79.17 | 26.99 | 78.38 | 32.87 | – |
| Total number of sites (excluding sites with gaps/missing data) | 543 | 535 | 485 | 467 | 515 | 509 | 521 | 3775 | 556 | 537 | 573 | 466 | 528 | 687 | 630 | 3938 |
| Number of polymorphic (segregating) sites (S) | 333 | 74 | 379 | 71 | 62 | 94 | 311 | 659 | 78 | 86 | 124 | 86 | 339 | 125 | 394 | 642 |
| Haplotypes | 47 | 30 | 47 | 33 | 30 | 43 | 45 | 424 | 66 | 42 | 63 | 43 | 40 | 101 | 39 | 315 |
| Haplotype diversity (Hd) | 1.000 | 0.996 | 0.975 | 0.995 | 0.987 | 0.991 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.986 | 0.975 | 0.988 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.999 |
| Nucleotide diversity (Pi) | 0.080 | 0.035 | 0.113 | 0.048 | 0.030 | 0.053 | 0.051 | 0.030 | 0.030 | 0.040 | 0.035 | 0.042 | 0.059 | 0.028 | 0.050 | 0.030 |
| Number of mutations (Eta) | 367 | 78 | 496 | 74 | 63 | 101 | 340 | 700 | 90 | 98 | 137 | 90 | 361 | 133 | 427 | 696 |
| Theta (per site) from Eta | 0.153 | 0.034 | 0.208 | 0.038 | 0.029 | 0.043 | 0.147 | 0.027 | 0.033 | 0.040 | 0.047 | 0.042 | 0.158 | 0.036 | 0.155 | 0.027 |
| Average number of nucleotide differences ( | 43.620 | 19.220 | 54.803 | 22.551 | 15.600 | 27.145 | 27.023 | 115.861 | 16.775 | 21.888 | 20.498 | 20.033 | 31.262 | 19.261 | 31.886 | 120.702 |
| Index of association (IA) | 0.2292 | 0.2176 | ||||||||||||||
Analysis of the markers used within the MLST scheme for species of the Cryptococcus complex.
| (A) Calculating the typing efficiency and discriminatory power | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | STs | ||||||||
| Number of alleles | 48 | 32 | 77 | 36 | 36 | 55 | 48 | 487 | |
| 74 | 49 | 89 | 53 | 42 | 107 | 44 | 344 | ||
| Number of polymorphisms | 61 | 94 | 562 | 83 | 83 | 131 | 100 | 1114 | |
| 81 | 100 | 359 | 99 | 83 | 156 | 80 | 958 | ||
| Typing efficiency∗ | 0.77 | 0.34 | 0.176 | 0.434 | 0.458 | 0.443 | 0.5 | 0.323 | |
| 0.926 | 0.49 | 0.253 | 0.545 | 0.506 | 0.686 | 0.55 | 0.482 | ||
| Discriminatory power∗ (95% CI) | 0.881 | 0.878 | 0.917 | 0.907 | 0.911 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 1 | |
| (0.861–0.901) | (0.864–0.892) | (0.898–0.935) | (0.893–0.92) | (0.903–0.92) | (0.8–0.859) | (0.894–0.926) | 1(1–1) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.906 | 0.974 | 0.873 | 0.931 | 0.969 | 0.901 | 1 | ||
| (0.929–0.951) | (0.888–0.925) | (0.969–0.979) | (0.843–0.902) | (0.92–0.941) | (0.961–0.977) | (0.88–0.92) | 1(1–1) | ||
| 1 | 7 | 32 | 51 | 99 | |||||
| 2 | 21 | 99 | 148 | 207 | |||||
| 3 | 35 | 187 | 244 | 293 | |||||
| 4 | 35 | 280 | 326 | 363 | |||||
| 5 | 21 | 354 | 394 | 425 | |||||
| 6 | 7 | 424 | 447 | 462 | |||||
| 7 | 1 | 487 | 487 | 487 | |||||
| 1 | 7 | 42 | 66 | 107 | |||||
| 2 | 21 | 97 | 145 | 208 | |||||
| 3 | 35 | 155 | 213 | 256 | |||||
| 4 | 35 | 213 | 263 | 289 | |||||
| 5 | 21 | 269 | 298 | 313 | |||||
| 6 | 7 | 310 | 323 | 330 | |||||
| 7 | 1 | 344 | 344 | 344 | |||||