| Literature DB >> 29740388 |
Luke Chen1, G Michael Halmagyi2.
Abstract
Bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP), which is due to peripheral lesions, may selectively involve certain semicircular canal (SCC). Recent eye movement recordings with search coil and video head impulse test (HIT) have provided insight in central lesions that can cause bilateral and selective SCC deficit mimicking BVP. Since neurological signs or ocular motor deficits maybe subtle or absent, it is critical to recognize central lesions correctly since there is prognostic and treatment implication. Acute floccular lesions cause bilateral horizontal SCC (HC) impairment while leaving vertical SCC function unaffected. Vestibular nuclear lesions affect bilateral HC and posterior SCC (PC) function, but anterior SCC (AC) function is spared. When both eyes are recorded, medial longitudinal fasciculus lesions cause horizontal dysconjugacy in HC function and catch-up saccades, as well as selective deficiency of PC over AC function. Combined peripheral and central lesions may be difficult to distinguish from BVP. Anterior inferior cerebellar artery stroke causes two types of deficits: 1. ipsilateral pan-SCC deficits and contralateral HC deficit and 2. bilateral HC deficit with vertical SCC sparing. Metabolic disorders such as Wernicke encephalopathy characteristically involve HC but not AC or PC function. Gaucher disease causes uniform loss of all SCC function but with minimal horizontal catch-up saccades. Genetic cerebellar ataxias and cerebellar-ataxia neuropathy vestibular areflexia syndrome typically do not spare AC function. While video HIT does not replace the gold-standard, search coil HIT, clinicians are now able to rapidly and accurately identify specific pattern of SCC deficits, which can aid differentiation of central lesions from BVP.Entities:
Keywords: bilateral vestibulopathy; central vestibular disorders; eye movements; head impulse test; semicircular canal
Year: 2018 PMID: 29740388 PMCID: PMC5928296 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Individual semicircular canal (SCC) function in posterior inferior cerebellar artery (n = 17) and superior cerebellar artery stroke (SCA, n = 3). (A) Group data (mean, solid lines; 95% confidence interval, dashed lines) displayed as time series of inverted eye and head velocities during the first 125 ms of head impulses, recorded using search coil HIT (scHIT). SCC function is indicated by the gain, the ratio of eye to head velocity. There is mild bilateral HC impairment (gain: ipsilateral 0.75 ± 0.09, contralateral 0.74 ± 0.08), while both AC (gain: ipsilateral 0.76 ± 0.06, contralateral 0.78 ± 0.06) and PC function (gain: 0.77 ± 0.06, contralateral, 0.74 ± 0.06) is intact. Note for SCC function evoked by scHIT, the lower limit normal for gain is ~0.8 for HC and ~0.7 for vertical SCC. (B) Radar plot depicting group data (mean, solid circles; 95% confidence interval, bars) displayed as gain for each SCC. IH, ipsilesional horizontal canal; IA, ipsilesional anterior canal; CA, contralesional anterior canal; CH, contralesional horizontal canal; CP, contralesional posterior canal; IP, ipsilesional posterior canal.
Figure 2Individual semicircular canal function in anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) stroke. (A) In the first type of AICA stroke (n = 8), group data displayed as time series of inverted eye and head velocities during the first 125 ms of head impulses, recorded using search coil HIT. Ipsilesional HC (gain 0.25 ± 0.10), AC (gain 0.24 ± 0.15), and PC (gain 0.39 ± 0.20) function was deficient, while only contralesional HC (gain 0.53 ± 0.14) but not AC (gain 0.79 ± 0.07) function was impaired. Contralesional PC function (gain 0.60 ± 0.08) function was slightly reduced, probably consistent with the severe ipsilesional AC deficit and reflects the on–off direction asymmetry. (B) In the second type of AICA stroke (n = 5), there is mild bilateral symmetrical HC deficit while AC and PC function is preserved. Radar plots depicting mean gain ± 95% confidence interval for the first type of AICA stroke (n = 8) and individual values for the second type of AICA stroke (n = 5) are presented in (C,D), respectively. IH, ipsilesional horizontal canal; IA, ipsilesional anterior canal; CA, contralesional anterior canal; CH, contralesional horizontal canal; CP, contralesional posterior canal; IP, ipsilesional posterior canal; P, patient.