| Literature DB >> 29740270 |
Nan-Fu Chen1,2, Chun-Sung Sung3,4, Zhi-Hong Wen5,6, Chun-Hong Chen5,7, Chien-Wei Feng5,7, Han-Chun Hung5,7, San-Nan Yang8, Kuan-Hao Tsui9,10,11,12, Wu-Fu Chen6,13,14.
Abstract
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is prepared by centrifuging fresh blood in an anticoagulant state, and harvesting the platelet-rich portion or condensing platelets. Studies have consistently demonstrated that PRP concentrates are an abundant source of growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and epithelial growth factor (EGF). The complex mechanisms underlying spinal cord injury (SCI) diminish intrinsic repair and neuronal regeneration. Several studies have suggested that growth factor-promoted axonal regeneration can occur for an extended period after injury. More importantly, the delivery of exogenous growth factors contained in PRP, such as EGF, IGF-1, and TGF-β, has neurotrophic effects on central nervous system (CNS) injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. However, only a few studies have investigated the effects of PRP on CNS injuries or neurodegenerative diseases. According to our review of relevant literature, no study has investigated the effect of intrathecal (i.t.) PRP injection into the injured spinal cord and activation of intrinsic mechanisms. In the present study, we directly injected i.t. PRP into rat spinal cords and examined the effects of PRP on normal and injured spinal cords. In rats with normal spinal cords, PRP induced microglia and astrocyte activation and PDGF-B and ICAM-1 expression. In rats with SCIs, i.t. PRP enhanced the locomotor recovery and spared white matter, promoted angiogenesis and neuronal regeneration, and modulated blood vessel size. Furthermore, a sustained treatment (a bolus of PRP followed by a 1/3 dose of initial PRP concentration) exerted more favorable therapeutic effects than a single dose of PRP. Our findings suggest by i.t. PRP stimulate angiogenesis, enhancing neuronal regeneration after SCI in rats. Although PRP induces minor inflammation in normal and injured spinal cords, it has many advantages. It is an autologous, biocompatible, nontoxic material that does not result in a major immune response. In addition, based on its safety and ease of preparation, we hypothesize that PRP is a promising therapeutic agent for SCI.Entities:
Keywords: angiogenesis; inflammation; neuroregeneration; platelet-rich plasma; rats; spinal cord injury
Year: 2018 PMID: 29740270 PMCID: PMC5924817 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Details of antibodies used in this study.
| 5-HT | ImmunoStar (Hudson, WI, USA) | 20079 | Goat |
| Cd11b (OX-42) | Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA) | CBL1512 | Mouse |
| GAP43 | Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA) | AB5220 | Rabbit |
| GFAP | Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA) | MAB3402 | Mouse |
| GFAP | GeneTex (Irvine, CA, USA) | GTX61295 | Rabbit |
| ICAM-1 | R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) | AF583 | Goat |
| Neurofilament | Chemicon (Temecula, CA, USA) | MAB5262 | Mouse |
| PDGF-B | Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) | Ab16829 | Rabbit |
| PDGFRβ | Cell signaling (Danvers, MA, USA) | 3169 | Rabbit |
| RECA-1 | Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA) | MCA970 | Mouse |
| vWF | Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA) | AB7356 | Rabbit |
Figure 4I.t. PRP promoted angiogenesis after SCI. Rats were sacrificed on day 60 after SCI, the cyro-sections of spinal cords were stained with vWF (A) and RECA-1 (B) antibodies. The vWF IR signal and RECA-1 positive blood vessel count indicate that plasma, PRP, and PRP treatments increased the blood vessel number after SCI. Furthermore, the blood vessels in PRP or PRP-sus treatment had larger diameters compared with vehicle or plasma treatment. The PRP and PRP-sus treatment also increasen in blood vessels associated with pericytes (identified by PDGFRβ antibody; C). Scale bars = 100 μm. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. a P < 0.05 compared with control group; b P < 0.05 compared with SCI + vehicle group; c P < 0.05 compared with SCI + plasma group; d P < 0.05 compared with SCI + PRP group.
Figure 1Effect of direct i.t. injection of PRP in normal spinal cords. The spinal cords were harvested 24 or 48 h after two doses of PRP i.t. administration. In the PRP or high dose PRP (PRP-H) treatments, the microglia were activated at both 24 or 48 h after injection (A). However, the astrocytes responded only to a high dose of PRP administration (B). The PDGF-B IR signal was significantly upregulated after a high dose of PRP administration at 24 or 48 h (C). The ICAM-1 IR signal was significantly upregulated after two doses of PRP administration (D). Scale bars = 100 μm (in A–C); 200 μm (in D). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, compared with the control group.
Figure 2I.t. PRP improved locomotor recovery after SCI. The BBB score was used to evaluate locomotor behavior every 3 days after SCI. In the pilot test, the AUC data suggest that PRP or high-dose PRP treatment improved locomotor recovery after SCI (A). The plasma, PRP, and PRP-sus treatments significantly improved locomotor recovery compared with the vehicle group (B) a P < 0.05 compared with SCI + vehicle group; b P < 0.05 compared with SCI + PRP group; c P < 0.05 compared with SCI + PRP-H group. The AUCs of PRP and PRP-sus treatments were significantly higher compared with the plasma group, and the SCI + PRP-sus group had the highest AUC among all groups. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. a P < 0.05 compared with SCI + vehicle group; b P < 0.05 compared with SCI + plasma group; c P < 0.05 compared with SCI + PRP group.
Figure 3Effect of PRP on SCI on day 7 after SCI. The rats were sacrificed on day 7 after SCI. The PRP and PRP-sus treatments significantly enhanced SCI-induced astrocyte activation and SCI-induced astrocytic PDGF-B expression. The number of PDGF-B-positive astrocytes in the SCI + PRP and SCI + PRP-sus groups was significantly higher than that in the SCI + vehicle or SCI + plasma groups. (A). The PRP treatment significantly enhanced SCI-induced microglia activation (B). Notably, PRP treatment significantly enhanced SCI-induced upregulation of ICAM-1 IR signal. Scale bars = 200 μm. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. a P < 0.05 compared with control group; b P < 0.05 compared with SCI + vehicle group; c P < 0.05 compared with SCI + plasma group; d P < 0.05 compared with SCI + PRP group.
Figure 5PRP treatment enhanced spared white matter after SCI. The rats were sacrificed on day 60 after SCI, and the spinal cords were sectioned serially. Plasma, PRP, and PRP-sus treatments significantly enhanced the spared white matter compared with vehicle treatment after SCI. The PRP-sus treatment exhibited the highest spared white matter among all treatments. Scale bars = 1 mm. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. a P < 0.05 compared with SCI + vehicle group; b P < 0.05 compared with SCI + plasma group; c P < 0.05 compared with SCI + PRP group.
Figure 6PRP treatment promoted neuroregeneration after SCI. The spinal cords were harvested on day 60 after SCI. The NF IR signals in the PRP and PRP-sus treatments were long and orderly. The NF and GAP-43 IR signal localization suggests that the NFs in the lesion were regenerated after SCI (inset). Scale bars = 500 μm; 200 μm (in inset).
Figure 75-HT intensity across lumbar coronal sections. SCI led to a significant decrease in 5HT IR signal compare to control groups. The 5-HT IR signal was significantly higher in the SCI + PRP and SCI + PRP-sus groups than in the SCI + vehicle and SCI + plasma groups. Scale bar = 500 μm. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. a P < 0.05 compared with control group; b P < 0.05 compared with SCI + vehicle group; c P < 0.05 compared with SCI + plasma group.