| Literature DB >> 29740233 |
Thomas Kiran Marella1, Narasimha Reddy Parine2, Archana Tiwari1.
Abstract
Because of the decreaEntities:
Keywords: Biodiesel; Diatom; Micro algae; Nualgi; Nutrient removal; Wastewater
Year: 2017 PMID: 29740233 PMCID: PMC5936867 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.05.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Showing different nutrient enrichment tested in the experimental study.
| Experimental variation | Nutrient source | Concentration |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Domestic and industrial waste water(DIW) | 18 mg L−1 N, 3.8 mg L−1 P |
| Silicate | DIW + Si2 | 35 mg L−1 Si |
| Silicate + trace metal | DIW + Si2 + trace metal | 35 mg L−1 Si + Fe + Trace metal solution as in F/2 Si medium ( |
| Nualgi | DIW + Si + trace metals | 1 ml l−1 Nualgi |
Fig. 1Growth curve of diatom consortium after inoculation in waste water enriched with Nualgi 1 ml L−1, Silica, Silica + trace metal solution and blank with no enrichment. Bars indicate SD.
Comparison of growth and lipid production parameters during different nutrient enrichments.
| Parameter | Blank | Nualgi | Si | Si + Fe + Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell no × 106 ml−1 | 0.9 | 2.89 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Dry weight g l−1 | 0.23 | 0.98 | 0.41 | 0.53 |
| Biomass productivity mg L−1 day−1 | 28.7 | 122.5 | 51.2 | 66.2 |
| Total lipid yield g l−1 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.06 | 0.11 |
| Lipid % DCW | 11.9 | 30.13 | 25.1 | 21.5 |
| Lipid productivity mg L−1 day−1 | 2.5 | 37 | 7.5 | 13.75 |
Type of water and nutrient enrichment with biomass and lipid percentage achieved in previous studies in comparison with present study.
| Type of water | Algal strain | Biomass g L−1 | Lipid content % DCW | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWW | 0.29 | 30 | ||
| MWW + 15%CO2 | 0.31 | 31 | ||
| 1° Treated | Mixed | 0.025 | 28 | |
| 1° Treated + CO2 | Mixed | 0.27 | 09 | |
| Facultative pond (STP) | 0.5 | 24.6 | ||
| Lake | 0.3 | 8.8 | ||
| DWW | Mixed | 3.4 | 28.2 | |
| MWW + IWW | Mixed | 0.14 | 11.9 | This study |
| MWW + IWW | Diatom consortium | 0.9 | 30.13 | This study |
Through OD at 650 nm.
MWW - municipal waste water.
Domestic waste water.
IWW - industrial waste water.
Showing relative abundance and diversity of microlagal species before and after Si + trace metal enrichment with Nualgi.
| Diatom species | Abundance | |
|---|---|---|
| With Nualgi | Without Nualgi | |
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
| – | ||
–: Not present.
Present.
Abundant.
Dominant.
Fig. 2Total nitrate (TN) (A), Total phosphate (TP) (A), Chemical oxygen demand (COD) (B) and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) (B) reduction from waste water by Diatom consortium under different Nutrient enrichments. Bars indicate SD.
Type of algal cultures and waste water along with N and P removal efficiencies achieved in previous studies in comparison with present study.
| Algal strain | Water type | Culture type | Removal time (d) | TN initial con | TN % removal | TP initial con | TP % removal | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWW | Batch | 5–9 | 3–36 | 30–95 | 112 | 20–55 | ||
| IWW | Batch | 9 | – | – | 112 | 20–55 | ||
| MWW | Batch | 0.2–8 | 27 | 79–100 | 12 | 47–98 | ||
| MWW | Continuous | 14 | 498–835 | 8–100 | 76 | 100 | ||
| Diatom consortium | MWW + IWW | Batch | 4–6 | 18.9 | 95 | 3.87 | 88.9 | This study |
cMWW - municipal waste water.
Ammonia N - NH2+-N.
IWW - industrial waste water.
Relative percentage of individual fatty acids and total lipid content in cultures grown with Nualgi, Si 35 mg/l and Si + Trace metal (same as F/2 medium concentration) compared to control (domestic waste water).
| Fatty acids | Control | Si | Si + Trace metals | Nualgi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:0 | 8.21 | 7.09 | 8.01 | 8.46 |
| 15:0 | 1.94 | 2.11 | 2.08 | 1.93 |
| 16:0 | 29.08 | 22.37 | 20.1 | 18.11 |
| 18:0 | 2.73 | 2.55 | 3.01 | 2.87 |
| 16:1( | 27.71 | 23.6 | 25.7 | 27.89 |
| 18:1( | 4.91 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 0.78 |
| 18:1( | 0.82 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.80 |
| 16:3( | 12.09 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 11.80 |
| 18:2( | 1.29 | 1.89 | 2.1 | 1.40 |
| 18:3( | 1.91 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.77 |
| 20:3( | 1.24 | 2.27 | 3.1 | 1.37 |
| 20:4( | 3.98 | 9.12 | 7.9 | 8.19 |
| 20:5( | 4.09 | 15.1 | 15.3 | 14.63 |
| Saturated | 41.96 | 34.12 | 33.2 | 31.37 |
| Mono-saturated | 33.44 | 25.6 | 25.7 | 29.47 |
| Poly-unsaturated | 24.6 | 40.28 | 40.28 | 39.16 |
| Total lipid content (% DCW) | 11.92 | 25.1 | 21.5 | 30.13 |